Literature DB >> 26643087

Minimizing the cost of locomotion with inclined trunk predicts crouched leg kinematics of small birds at realistic levels of elastic recoil.

Christian Rode1, Yefta Sutedja2, Brandon M Kilbourne3, Reinhard Blickhan2, Emanuel Andrada4.   

Abstract

Small birds move with pronograde trunk orientation and crouched legs. Although the pronograde trunk has been suggested to be beneficial for grounded running, the cause(s) of the specific leg kinematics are unknown. Here we show that three charadriiform bird species (northern lapwing, oystercatcher, and avocet; great examples of closely related species that differ remarkably in their hind limb design) move their leg segments during stance in a way that minimizes the cost of locomotion. We imposed measured trunk motions and ground reaction forces on a kinematic model of the birds. The model was used to search for leg configurations that minimize leg work that accounts for two factors: elastic recoil in the intertarsal joint, and cheaper negative muscle work relative to positive muscle work. A physiological level of elasticity (∼ 0.6) yielded segment motions that match the experimental data best, with a root mean square of angular deviations of ∼ 2.1 deg. This finding suggests that the exploitation of elastic recoil shapes the crouched leg kinematics of small birds under the constraint of pronograde trunk motion. Considering that an upright trunk and more extended legs likely decrease the cost of locomotion, our results imply that the cost of locomotion is a secondary movement criterion for small birds. Scaling arguments suggest that our approach may be utilized to provide new insights into the motion of extinct species such as dinosaurs.
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avian locomotion; Charadriiform birds; Kinetics; Leg work; Optimization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26643087     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.127910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Using step width to compare locomotor biomechanics between extinct, non-avian theropod dinosaurs and modern obligate bipeds.

Authors:  P J Bishop; C J Clemente; R E Weems; D F Graham; L P Lamas; J R Hutchinson; J Rubenson; R S Wilson; S A Hocknull; R S Barrett; D G Lloyd
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Stability in skipping gaits.

Authors:  Emanuel Andrada; Roy Müller; Reinhard Blickhan
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  The influence of speed and size on avian terrestrial locomotor biomechanics: Predicting locomotion in extinct theropod dinosaurs.

Authors:  P J Bishop; D F Graham; L P Lamas; J R Hutchinson; J Rubenson; J A Hancock; R S Wilson; S A Hocknull; R S Barrett; D G Lloyd; C J Clemente
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Limb work and joint work minimization reveal an energetic benefit to the elbows-back, knees-forward limb design in parasagittal quadrupeds.

Authors:  James R Usherwood; Michael C Granatosky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Limb, joint and pelvic kinematic control in the quail coping with steps upwards and downwards.

Authors:  Emanuel Andrada; Oliver Mothes; Heiko Stark; Matthew C Tresch; Joachim Denzler; Martin S Fischer; Reinhard Blickhan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Postural control during quiet bipedal standing in rats.

Authors:  Tetsuro Funato; Yota Sato; Soichiro Fujiki; Yamato Sato; Shinya Aoi; Kazuo Tsuchiya; Dai Yanagihara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.