Literature DB >> 26642799

Patient characteristics associated with treatment choice for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Stephanie A Sullivan1, Emily R W Davidson1, C Emi Bretschneider1, Abigail L Liberty1, Elizabeth J Geller2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) frequently undergo more than one treatment prior to settling on their final strategy. We hypothesize that women who are younger, with worse POP and SUI symptoms will desire and choose surgical treatment.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed over 1 year identifying new patients presenting with POP and/or SUI at a university hospital. Our aim was to determine patient desire for either surgical or conservative treatment, as well as the actual treatment chosen and received after the first visit and 1 year later. To identify predictors of choice, baseline demographic characteristics were obtained.
RESULTS: Of the 203 women who met the inclusion criteria, 44.3 % (90/203) desired surgery and 55.7 % (113/203) desired conservative treatment at their first visit. Women who desired surgery were more likely to be younger (p = 0.003), sexually active (p = 0.001), have more advanced prolapse (p = 0.006), and have more bothersome symptoms (p = 0.05). Of the women who desired surgery at their first visit, 12.2 % (11/90) actually chose conservative treatment. These women were less likely to be insured (p = 0.01). By 1 year, of the women who initially desired and subsequently chose conservative treatment, 26.5 % (30/113) had undergone surgery. The women who changed from conservative to surgical treatment were more likely to be younger (p = 0.01), non-White (p = 0.03), and sexually active (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, younger, sexually active women were more likely to either opt for surgery initially or to change their treatment plan from conservative to surgical.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Incontinence; Pessary; Prolapse; Treatment choice

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26642799     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2907-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  12 in total

1.  Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997.

Authors:  Sarah Hamilton Boyles; Anne M Weber; Leslie Meyn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Outcomes of observation as therapy for pelvic organ prolapse: a study in the natural history of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Alienor S Gilchrist; William Campbell; Hannah Steele; Hema Brazell; Jonathon Foote; Steven Swift
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 3.  [Obesity and urogynecology: a systematic review].

Authors:  T Thubert; X Deffieux; V Letouzey; J-F Hermieu
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 0.915

4.  Symptoms, quality of life, and factors affecting women's treatment decisions regarding pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Symphorosa Shing Chee Chan; Rachel Yau Kar Cheung; Ka Wah Yiu; Lai Loi Lee; Albe Wai Lam Pang; Tony Kwok Hung Chung
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Insurance Expansion and the Utilization of Inpatient Surgery: Evidence for a "Woodwork" Effect?

Authors:  Chandy Ellimoottil; Sarah Miller; Matthew Davis; David C Miller
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.058

6.  Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Catherine A Matthews; Mitchell M Conover; Virginia Pate; Michele Jonsson Funk
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Patient characteristics that are associated with continued pessary use versus surgery after 1 year.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Clemons; Vivian C Aguilar; Eric R Sokol; Neil D Jackson; Deborah L Myers
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Patient satisfaction and changes in prolapse and urinary symptoms in women who were fitted successfully with a pessary for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Clemons; Vivian C Aguilar; Tara A Tillinghast; Neil D Jackson; Deborah L Myers
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  Obesity and urinary incontinence: epidemiology and clinical research update.

Authors:  Leslee L Subak; Holly E Richter; Steinar Hunskaar
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988-1990.

Authors:  L S Wilcox; L M Koonin; R Pokras; L T Strauss; Z Xia; H B Peterson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  5 in total

1.  Counseling in urogynecology: A difficult task, or simply good surgeon-patient communication?

Authors:  Matteo Balzarro; Emanuele Rubilotta; Claudia Goss; Elisabetta Costantini; Walter Artibani; Peter Sand
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  The relationship between age and pelvic organ prolapse bother.

Authors:  Casey L Kinman; Courtney A Lemieux; Anubhav Agrawal; Jeremy T Gaskins; Kate V Meriwether; Sean L Francis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Perioperative adverse events in women undergoing concurrent urogynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgeries for suspected malignancy.

Authors:  Emily R W Davidson; Katherine Woodburn; Mariam AlHilli; Cecile A Ferrando
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Defecatory dysfunction and other clinical variables are predictors of pessary discontinuation.

Authors:  Erin G Dengler; Louisa A Mounsey; Francesca Gines; Manahil Agha; Terri Long; Elizabeth J Geller
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Pessary use in stress urinary incontinence: a review of advantages, complications, patient satisfaction, and quality of life.

Authors:  Ghadeer Al-Shaikh; Sadiqa Syed; Somaia Osman; Abdulrahman Bogis; Ahmed Al-Badr
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-04-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.