Marissa D Zwan1,2, Victor L Villemagne2,3, Vincent Doré4, Rachel Buckley3,5, Pierrick Bourgeat4, Robyn Veljanoski2, Olivier Salvado4, Rob Williams3, Laura Margison2, Alan Rembach3, S Lance Macaulay6, Ralph Martins7, David Ames8,9, Wiesje M van der Flier1,10, Kathryn A Ellis3,9, Philip Scheltens1, Colin L Masters3, Christopher C Rowe2. 1. Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia. 3. The Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 4. CSIRO Digital Productivity Flagship, The Australian e-Health Research Centre - BioMedIA, Herston, Queensland, Australia. 5. Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 6. CSIRO Food and Nutrion Flagship, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 7. Centre of Excellence for Alzheimer's Disease Research & Care, School of Medical Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia. 8. National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 9. Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 10. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: APOEɛ4 genotype and aging have been identified as risk factors for Alzheimer's disease (AD). In addition, subjective memory complaints (SMC) might be a first clinical expression of the effect of AD pathology on cognitive functioning. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether APOEɛ4 genotype, age, SMC, and episodic memory are risk factors for high amyloid-β (Aβ) burden in cognitively normal elderly. METHODS: 307 cognitively normal participants (72.7 ± 6.8 years, 53% female, 55% SMC) from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study underwent amyloid PET and APOE genotyping. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association of APOEɛ4 genotype, age, SMC, and episodic memory with Aβ pathology. RESULTS: Odds of high Aβ burden were greater at an older age (OR = 3.21; 95% CI = 1.68-6.14), when SMC were present (OR = 1.90; 95% CI = 1.03-3.48), and for APOEɛ4 carriers (OR = 7.49; 95% CI = 3.96-14.15), while episodic memory was not associated with odds of high Aβ burden. Stratified analyses showed that odds of SMC for high Aβ burden were increased in specifically APOEɛ4 carriers (OR = 4.58, 95% CI = 1.83-11.49) and younger participants (OR = 3.73, 95% CI = 1.39-10.01). CONCLUSION: Aging, APOEɛ4 genotype, and SMC were associated with high Aβ burden. SMC were especially indicative of high Aβ burden in younger participants and in APOEɛ4 carriers. These findings suggest that selection based on the presence of SMC, APOEɛ4 genotype and age may help identify healthy elderly participants with high Aβ burden eligible for secondary prevention trials.
BACKGROUND:APOEɛ4 genotype and aging have been identified as risk factors for Alzheimer's disease (AD). In addition, subjective memory complaints (SMC) might be a first clinical expression of the effect of AD pathology on cognitive functioning. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether APOEɛ4 genotype, age, SMC, and episodic memory are risk factors for high amyloid-β (Aβ) burden in cognitively normal elderly. METHODS: 307 cognitively normal participants (72.7 ± 6.8 years, 53% female, 55% SMC) from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study underwent amyloid PET and APOE genotyping. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association of APOEɛ4 genotype, age, SMC, and episodic memory with Aβ pathology. RESULTS: Odds of high Aβ burden were greater at an older age (OR = 3.21; 95% CI = 1.68-6.14), when SMC were present (OR = 1.90; 95% CI = 1.03-3.48), and for APOEɛ4 carriers (OR = 7.49; 95% CI = 3.96-14.15), while episodic memory was not associated with odds of high Aβ burden. Stratified analyses showed that odds of SMC for high Aβ burden were increased in specifically APOEɛ4 carriers (OR = 4.58, 95% CI = 1.83-11.49) and younger participants (OR = 3.73, 95% CI = 1.39-10.01). CONCLUSION: Aging, APOEɛ4 genotype, and SMC were associated with high Aβ burden. SMC were especially indicative of high Aβ burden in younger participants and in APOEɛ4 carriers. These findings suggest that selection based on the presence of SMC, APOEɛ4 genotype and age may help identify healthy elderly participants with high Aβ burden eligible for secondary prevention trials.
Authors: Dustin B Hammers; Taylor J Atkinson; Bonnie C A Dalley; Kayla R Suhrie; Kevin P Horn; Kelli M Rasmussen; Britney E Beardmore; Lance D Burrell; Kevin Duff; John M Hoffman Journal: Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 2.035
Authors: Brian J Lopresti; Elizabeth M Campbell; Zheming Yu; Stewart J Anderson; Ann D Cohen; Davneet S Minhas; Beth E Snitz; Sarah K Royse; Carl R Becker; Howard J Aizenstein; Chester A Mathis; Oscar L Lopez; William E Klunk; Dana L Tudorascu Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2020-05-31 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Dustin B Hammers; Taylor J Atkinson; Bonnie C A Dalley; Kayla R Suhrie; Britney E Beardmore; Lance D Burrell; Kevin P Horn; Kelli M Rasmussen; Norman L Foster; Kevin Duff; John M Hoffman Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Sarah L Aghjayan; Rachel F Buckley; Patrizia Vannini; Dorene M Rentz; Jonathan D Jackson; Reisa A Sperling; Keith A Johnson; Rebecca E Amariglio Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: José L Molinuevo; Laura A Rabin; Rebecca Amariglio; Rachel Buckley; Bruno Dubois; Kathryn A Ellis; Michael Ewers; Harald Hampel; Stefan Klöppel; Lorena Rami; Barry Reisberg; Andrew J Saykin; Sietske Sikkes; Colette M Smart; Beth E Snitz; Reisa Sperling; Wiesje M van der Flier; Michael Wagner; Frank Jessen Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2016-11-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Piotr Lewczuk; Peter Riederer; Sid E O'Bryant; Marcel M Verbeek; Bruno Dubois; Pieter Jelle Visser; Kurt A Jellinger; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Alfredo Ramirez; Lucilla Parnetti; Clifford R Jack; Charlotte E Teunissen; Harald Hampel; Alberto Lleó; Frank Jessen; Lidia Glodzik; Mony J de Leon; Anne M Fagan; José Luis Molinuevo; Willemijn J Jansen; Bengt Winblad; Leslie M Shaw; Ulf Andreasson; Markus Otto; Brit Mollenhauer; Jens Wiltfang; Martin R Turner; Inga Zerr; Ron Handels; Alexander G Thompson; Gunilla Johansson; Natalia Ermann; John Q Trojanowski; Ilker Karaca; Holger Wagner; Patrick Oeckl; Linda van Waalwijk van Doorn; Maria Bjerke; Dimitrios Kapogiannis; H Bea Kuiperij; Lucia Farotti; Yi Li; Brian A Gordon; Stéphane Epelbaum; Stephanie J B Vos; Catharina J M Klijn; William E Van Nostrand; Carolina Minguillon; Matthias Schmitz; Carla Gallo; Andrea Lopez Mato; Florence Thibaut; Simone Lista; Daniel Alcolea; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Johannes Kornhuber Journal: World J Biol Psychiatry Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Rachel F Buckley; Victor L Villemagne; Colin L Masters; Kathryn A Ellis; Christopher C Rowe; Keith Johnson; Reisa Sperling; Rebecca Amariglio Journal: J Mol Neurosci Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 3.444