Literature DB >> 26637380

How Many Samples and How Many Culture Media To Diagnose a Prosthetic Joint Infection: a Clinical and Microbiological Prospective Multicenter Study.

Pascale Bémer1, Julie Léger2, Didier Tandé3, Chloé Plouzeau4, Anne Sophie Valentin5, Anne Jolivet-Gougeon6, Carole Lemarié7, Marie Kempf7, Geneviève Héry-Arnaud3, Laurent Bret8, Marie Emmanuelle Juvin9, Bruno Giraudeau2, Stéphane Corvec9, Christophe Burucoa4.   

Abstract

Although numerous perioperative samples and culture media are required to diagnose prosthetic joint infection (PJI), their exact number and types have not yet been definitely determined with a high level of proof. We conducted a prospective multicenter study to determine the minimal number of samples and culture media required for accurate diagnosis of PJI. Over a 2-year period, consecutive patients with clinical signs suggesting PJI were included, with five perioperative samples per patient. The bacteriological and PJI diagnosis criteria were assessed using a random selection of two, three, or four samples and compared with those obtained using the recommended five samples (references guidelines). The results obtained with two or three culture media were then compared with those obtained with five culture media for both criteria. The times-to-positivity of the different culture media were calculated. PJI was confirmed in 215/264 suspected cases, with a bacteriological criterion in 192 (89%). The PJI was monomicrobial (85%) or polymicrobial (15%). Percentages of agreement of 98.1% and 99.7%, respectively, for the bacteriological criterion and confirmed PJI diagnosis were obtained when four perioperative samples were considered. The highest percentages of agreement were obtained with the association of three culture media, a blood culture bottle, a chocolate agar plate, and Schaedler broth, incubated for 5, 7, and 14 days, respectively. This new procedure leads to significant cost saving. Our prospective multicenter study showed that four samples seeded on three culture media are sufficient for diagnosing PJI.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26637380      PMCID: PMC4733176          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02497-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  22 in total

1.  Use of blood culture vial specimens in intraoperative detection of infection.

Authors:  B R Levine; B G Evans
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Culture with BACTEC Peds Plus bottle compared with conventional media for the detection of bacteria in tissue samples from orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Aurélie Velay; Frédéric Schramm; Jeannot Gaudias; Benoît Jaulhac; Philippe Riegel
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Fionna Mowat; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection.

Authors:  Andrej Trampuz; Kerryl E Piper; Melissa J Jacobson; Arlen D Hanssen; Krishnan K Unni; Douglas R Osmon; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Franklin R Cockerill; James M Steckelberg; James F Greenleaf; Robin Patel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Improved method of isolating bacteria from joint fluids by the use of blood culture bottles.

Authors:  R von Essen; A Hölttä
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group.

Authors:  B L Atkins; N Athanasou; J J Deeks; D W Crook; H Simpson; T E Peto; P McLardy-Smith; A R Berendt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a prospective evaluation of four bacterial culture media in the routine laboratory.

Authors:  H C Hughes; R Newnham; N Athanasou; B L Atkins; P Bejon; I C J W Bowler
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  Blood culture flasks for culturing synovial fluid in prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Lluís Font-Vizcarra; Sebastián García; Juan C Martínez-Pastor; Josep M Sierra; Alex Soriano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The role of intraoperative frozen sections in revision total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  D S Feldman; J H Lonner; P Desai; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Prolonged bacterial culture to identify late periprosthetic joint infection: a promising strategy.

Authors:  Peter Schäfer; Bernd Fink; Dieter Sandow; Andreas Margull; Irina Berger; Lars Frommelt
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  A Real Pain: Diagnostic Quandaries and Septic Arthritis.

Authors:  Cristina Costales; Susan M Butler-Wu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Optimal Periprosthetic Tissue Specimen Number for Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Trisha N Peel; Tim Spelman; Brenda L Dylla; John G Hughes; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; Allen C Cheng; Jayawant N Mandrekar; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Improving the Diagnosis of Orthopedic Implant-Associated Infections: Optimizing the Use of Tools Already in the Box.

Authors:  Shawn Vasoo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Laboratory Workflow Analysis of Culture of Periprosthetic Tissues in Blood Culture Bottles.

Authors:  Trisha N Peel; John A Sedarski; Brenda L Dylla; Samantha K Shannon; Fazlollaah Amirahmadi; John G Hughes; Allen C Cheng; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Concordance between the old and new diagnostic criteria for periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Meeri Honkanen; Esa Jämsen; Matti Karppelin; Reetta Huttunen; Outi Lyytikäinen; Jaana Syrjänen
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.553

6.  Is it necessary to change instruments between sampling sites when taking multiple tissue specimens in musculoskeletal infections?

Authors:  D Makki; S Abdalla; T A El Gamal; D Harvey; G Jackson; S Platt
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  High performance of α-defensin lateral flow assay (Synovasure) in the diagnosis of chronic knee prosthetic infections.

Authors:  Giovanni Balato; Vincenzo Franceschini; Tiziana Ascione; Alfredo Lamberti; Michele D'Amato; Andrea Ensini; Andrea Baldini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Fluorescent tetracycline bone labeling as an intraoperative tool to debride necrotic bone during septic hip revision: a preliminary case series.

Authors:  Ernesto Muñoz-Mahamud; Jenaro Ángel Fernández-Valencia; Andreu Combalia; Laura Morata; Álex Soriano
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2021-01-27

Review 9.  Optimal microbiological sampling for the diagnosis of osteoarticular infection.

Authors:  Ricardo Sousa; André Carvalho; Ana Cláudia Santos; Miguel Araújo Abreu
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-06-28

10.  Diagnosing Fracture-Related Infections: Where Are We Now?

Authors:  Madeleine C Stevenson; Julia C Slater; H Claude Sagi; Federico Palacio Bedoya; Margaret V Powers-Fletcher
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 11.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.