| Literature DB >> 26637380 |
Pascale Bémer1, Julie Léger2, Didier Tandé3, Chloé Plouzeau4, Anne Sophie Valentin5, Anne Jolivet-Gougeon6, Carole Lemarié7, Marie Kempf7, Geneviève Héry-Arnaud3, Laurent Bret8, Marie Emmanuelle Juvin9, Bruno Giraudeau2, Stéphane Corvec9, Christophe Burucoa4.
Abstract
Although numerous perioperative samples and culture media are required to diagnose prosthetic joint infection (PJI), their exact number and types have not yet been definitely determined with a high level of proof. We conducted a prospective multicenter study to determine the minimal number of samples and culture media required for accurate diagnosis of PJI. Over a 2-year period, consecutive patients with clinical signs suggesting PJI were included, with five perioperative samples per patient. The bacteriological and PJI diagnosis criteria were assessed using a random selection of two, three, or four samples and compared with those obtained using the recommended five samples (references guidelines). The results obtained with two or three culture media were then compared with those obtained with five culture media for both criteria. The times-to-positivity of the different culture media were calculated. PJI was confirmed in 215/264 suspected cases, with a bacteriological criterion in 192 (89%). The PJI was monomicrobial (85%) or polymicrobial (15%). Percentages of agreement of 98.1% and 99.7%, respectively, for the bacteriological criterion and confirmed PJI diagnosis were obtained when four perioperative samples were considered. The highest percentages of agreement were obtained with the association of three culture media, a blood culture bottle, a chocolate agar plate, and Schaedler broth, incubated for 5, 7, and 14 days, respectively. This new procedure leads to significant cost saving. Our prospective multicenter study showed that four samples seeded on three culture media are sufficient for diagnosing PJI.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26637380 PMCID: PMC4733176 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02497-15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Microbiol ISSN: 0095-1137 Impact factor: 5.948