Literature DB >> 26636952

Erroneous Silencing of the Mitotic Checkpoint by Aberrant Spindle Pole-Kinetochore Coordination.

Jing Chen1, Jian Liu2.   

Abstract

To segregate chromosomes during cell division, microtubules that form the bipolar spindle attach to and pull on paired chromosome kinetochores. The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is activated at unattached and misattached kinetochores to prevent further mitotic progression. The SAC is silenced after all the kinetochores establish proper and stable attachment to the spindle. Robust timing of SAC silencing after the last kinetochore-spindle attachment herein dictates the fidelity of chromosome segregation. Chromosome missegregation is rare in typical somatic cell mitosis, but frequent in cancer cell mitosis and in meiosis I of mammalian oocytes. In the latter cases, SAC is normally activated in response to disruptions of kinetochore-spindle attachments, suggesting that frequent chromosome missegregation ensues from faulty SAC silencing. In-depth understanding of how SAC silencing malfunctions in these cases is yet missing, but is believed to hold promise for treatment of cancer and prevention of human miscarriage and birth defects. We previously established a spatiotemporal model that, to the best of our knowledge, explained the robustness of SAC silencing in normal mitosis for the first time. In this article, we take advantage of the whole-cell perspective of the spatiotemporal model to identify possible causes of chromosome missegregation out of the distinct features of spindle assembly exhibited by cancer cells and mammalian oocytes. The model results explain why multipolar spindle could inhibit SAC silencing and spindle pole clustering could promote it-albeit accompanied by more kinetochore attachment errors. The model also eliminates geometric factors as the cause for nonrobust SAC silencing in oocyte meiosis, and instead, suggests atypical kinetochore-spindle attachment in meiosis as a potential culprit. Overall, the model shows that abnormal spindle-pole formation and its aberrant coordination with atypical kinetochore-spindle attachments could compromise the robustness of SAC silencing. Our model highlights systems-level coupling between kinetochore-spindle attachment and spindle-pole formation in SAC silencing.
Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26636952      PMCID: PMC4675864          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  123 in total

1.  Spindle assembly checkpoint signalling is uncoupled from chromosomal position in mouse oocytes.

Authors:  Liming Gui; Hayden Homer
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  Oocyte-specific differences in cell-cycle control create an innate susceptibility to meiotic errors.

Authors:  So Iha Nagaoka; Craig A Hodges; David F Albertini; Patricia Ann Hunt
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Self-organization of MTOCs replaces centrosome function during acentrosomal spindle assembly in live mouse oocytes.

Authors:  Melina Schuh; Jan Ellenberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Modeling the temporal evolution of the spindle assembly checkpoint and role of Aurora B kinase.

Authors:  Hitesh B Mistry; David E MacCallum; Robert C Jackson; Mark A J Chaplain; Fordyce A Davidson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  New insights into the troubles of aneuploidy.

Authors:  Jake J Siegel; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 13.827

6.  Slow checkpoint activation kinetics as a safety device in anaphase.

Authors:  Julia Kamenz; Silke Hauf
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins; implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing.

Authors:  Jagesh V Shah; Elliot Botvinick; Zahid Bonday; Frank Furnari; Michael Berns; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Evidence for an upper limit to mitotic spindle length.

Authors:  Martin Wühr; Yao Chen; Sophie Dumont; Aaron C Groen; Daniel J Needleman; Adrian Salic; Timothy J Mitchison
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Sensing chromosome bi-orientation by spatial separation of aurora B kinase from kinetochore substrates.

Authors:  Dan Liu; Gerben Vader; Martijn J M Vromans; Michael A Lampson; Susanne M A Lens
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time.

Authors:  Andrea Musacchio; Edward D Salmon
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 94.444

View more
  5 in total

1.  Spindle Size Scaling Contributes to Robust Silencing of Mitotic Spindle Assembly Checkpoint.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Jian Liu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  The frequency and consequences of multipolar mitoses in undifferentiated embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Veronika Pospisilova; Milan Esner; Iveta Cervenkova; Radek Fedr; Jean-Yvez Tinevez; Ales Hampl; Martin Anger
Journal:  J Appl Biomed       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 1.797

3.  Dynamics robustness of cascading systems.

Authors:  Jonathan T Young; Tetsuhiro S Hatakeyama; Kunihiko Kaneko
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Identification and Integrated Analysis of Key Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Xingyuan Liu; Xuefeng Liu; Jingyuan Li; Fu Ren
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-12-05

5.  Spindle Architectural Features Must Be Considered Along With Cell Size to Explain the Timing of Mitotic Checkpoint Silencing.

Authors:  Mathew Bloomfield; Jing Chen; Daniela Cimini
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.