| Literature DB >> 26635607 |
Rizwana Sarwar1, Umar Farooq1, Ajmal Khan1, Sadia Naz1, Sara Khan1, Afsar Khan1, Abdur Rauf2, Haji Bahadar3, Reaz Uddin4.
Abstract
Considering the indigenous utilization of Quercus incana Roxb., the present study deals with the investigation of antioxidant, free radical scavenging activity, total phenolic content, and antimicrobial activity of Q. incana Roxb. In vitro antioxidant activity of the plant fractions were determined by 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl and nitric oxide scavenging method. Total phenolic contents were determined by gallic acid equivalent and antimicrobial activities were determined by agar well diffusion method. It was observed that Q. incana Roxb. showed significant antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. n-Butanol fraction showed maximum activity against Micrococcus leuteus with 19 mm zone of inhibition. n-Butanol fraction of Q. incana Roxb. showed immense antifungal activity against Aspergillus niger (32 mm ± 0.55) and A. flavus (28 mm ± 0.45). Similarly n-butanol fraction showed relatively good antioxidant activity with IC50 value of 55.4 ± 0.21 μg/mL. The NO scavenging activity of ethyl acetate fraction (IC50 = 23.21 ± 0.31 μg/mL) was fairly good compared to other fractions. The current study of Q. incana Roxb. suggests the presences of synergetic action of some biological active compounds that may be present in the leaves of medicinal plant. Further studies are needed to better characterize the important active constituents responsible for the antimicrobial, antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity.Entities:
Keywords: Quercus incana Roxb.; antimicrobial; antioxidant activity; free radical scavenging; oxidative stress
Year: 2015 PMID: 26635607 PMCID: PMC4655348 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00277
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Antioxidant potential of Querus incana Roxb.
| Plant extracts | % RSA at 500 μg/ml | IC50 (μg/ml) |
|---|---|---|
| 91.72 | 40.13 ± 0.74 | |
| 89.56 | 58.76 ± 0.45 | |
| Crude extract (QE) | 18.41 | 456.4 ± 0.27 |
| 26.02 | 677.8 ± 0.67 | |
| Chloroform (QCX) | 27.24 | 258.8 ± 1.03 |
| Ethyl acetate (ETX) | 58.89 | 182.2 ± 0.85 |
| 64.85 | 55.4 ± 0.21 |
NO scavenging activity of Querus incana Roxb.
| Plant extracts | % RSA at 500 μg/ml | IC50 (μg/ml) |
|---|---|---|
| Ascorboic acid (Standard) | 80.42 | 48.88 ± 0.74 |
| QE | 45.02 | 282.87 ± 0.08 |
| QHX | 38.84 | 374.27 ± 0.28 |
| QCX | 50.94 | 108.63 ± 0.78 |
| ETX | 60.88 | 23.21 ± 0.31 |
| QBX | 49.17 | 238.17 ± 0.16 |
Total phenolic content of Q. incana Roxb.
| Plant extracts | Total phenol (mg/g) |
|---|---|
| QE | 165 ± 6 |
| QHX | 43 ± 4 |
| QCX | 56 ± 7 |
| ETX | 65 ± 7 |
| QBX | 89 ± 3 |
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of Q. incana Roxb. measured at different concentrations (mg/ml).
| Pathogenic bacteria | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant extracts | |||||||
| Ciprofloxacin (Standard) | 0.75 | 0.187 | 0.75 | 0.187 | 1.50 | - | 0.375 |
| QE | 0.187 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 0.187 | 1.50 | - | 1.50 |
| QHX | 1.50 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.375 | 1.50 | - | - |
| QCX | 0.75 | 1.50 | 0.187 | 0.375 | 0.187 | - | 0.75 |
| ETX | 0.187 | 0.187 | 0.75 | 0.187 | 0.375 | - | 1.50 |
| QBX | 1.50 | 1.50 | 0.375 | 1.50 | 0.75 | - | - |
Minimum inhibitory concentration values Antifungal activity of extract measured at different concentrations (mg/ml).
| Plant extracts | Pathogenic fungi | |
|---|---|---|
| QE | 0.187 | 1.5 |
| QHX | 1.50 | 0.375 |
| QCX | 0.75 | 0.187 |
| ETX | - | 1.5 |
| QBX | 0.75 | 1.50 |
| Nystatin (standard) | 0.375 | 1.50 |
Antifungal activity of Q. incana Roxb. (3 mg/ml, zone of inhibition in mm ± SD).
| Plant extracts | Pathogenic fungi | |
|---|---|---|
| QE | 19 mm ± 0.41 | 18 mm ± 0.85 |
| QHX | 16 mm ± 0.26 | 19 mm ± 0.41 |
| QCX | 12 mm ± 0.28 | 14 mm ± 0.66 |
| ETX | – | 25 mm ± 0.75 |
| QBX | 28 mm ± 0.45 | 32 mm ± 0.55 |
| Nystatin (standard) | 16 mm ± 0.92 | 23 mm ± 0.41 |