| Literature DB >> 26634068 |
Samraa H Abdel-Kawi1, Khalid S Hashem2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atherosclerosis is the leading cause of death worldwide. there are no effective approaches to regressing atherosclerosis due to not fully understood mechanisms. Recently, stem cell-based therapies have held promises to various diseases, including vascular diseases. AIM: The present study aimed at investigating the possible effect of cord blood mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy on atherosclerosis.Entities:
Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Cord blood; Mesenchymal stem cells; eNOS; iNOS
Year: 2015 PMID: 26634068 PMCID: PMC4651284 DOI: 10.15283/ijsc.2015.8.2.200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Stem Cells ISSN: 2005-3606 Impact factor: 2.500
Fig. 1(A) Three layers forming wall of aorta: tunica intima (TI), tunica media (TM) formed of concentrically-arranged smooth muscle (black arrow) and tunica adventitia (TA) exhibiting vasa vasorum (white arrow) (group I, H&E, ×200). (B) Tunica intima exhibiting simple squamous endothelium (black arrow) with underlying lamina propria (white arrow) (group I, H&E, ×400). (C) Thickening of tunica intima (TI) with fat deposition (black arrow) and appearance of foam cells (white arrow). Tunica adventitia shows inflammatory reaction (arrow heads) (group II, H&E, ×200). (D) Thickening of tunica intima (TI) with fat deposition (black arrow) and appearance of foam cells (white arrow) (group II, H&E, ×400). (E) Increased thickness of the whole wall of aorta (double headed arrow) with protrusion of intima into lumen (black arrow) (group II, H&E, ×200). (F) Smooth muscle proliferation and migration into intima (black arrow) (group II, H&E, ×400). (G) Thickened wall of aorta with protrusion into lumen (black arrow) and thinning of adventitia (white arrow) (group II, H&E, ×200). (H) normal aorta except tunica media show some foam cells (black arrow) and congested vasa vasorum within tunica adventitia (white arrow) (group III, H&E, ×200).
Aortic wall thickness and area % of collagen fibers distribution eNOS, iNOS and vimentin immune-reaction of of Aorta in all groups
| Group I (Control) | Group II (atherogenic) | Group III (stem cell) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aortic wall thickness | 80.79±1.38 | 124.70±8.40 | 83.25±1.66 |
| Area % of collagen fibers | 8.79±0.873 | 13.06±1.934 | 8.13±0.743 |
| Area % of vimentin immune-reaction | 1.08±0.43 | 5.16±0.73 | 1.09±1.01 |
| Area % of eNOS immune-reaction | 2.56±0.538 | 1.61±0.66 | 1.64±1.01 |
| Area % of iNOS immune-reaction | 0.76±0.07 | 3.01±0.14 | 1.08±0.19 |
significant compared to control group,
significant compared to atherogenic group p<0.05.
Fig. 2(A) Minimal collagen fibers (arrows) (group I). (B) Extensive collagen fibers (arrows) (group II). (C) Minimal collagen fibers (arrows) (group II) (Masson’ trichrome, ×200). (D) Minimal vimentin immunoreactivity (group i). (E) Increased vimentin immunoreactivity (group II). (F) Minimal vimentin immunoreactivity (group III) (immunostaining for vimentin ×200).
Fig. 3(A) eNOS immunoreactivity in tunica intima (arrows) (group I). (B) Weak eNOS immunoreactivity in tunica intima (arrows) (group II). (C) eNOS immunoreactivity in tunica intima (group III) (immunostainig for eNOS, ×200). (D) Weak iNOS immunoreactivity (arrows) (group I). (E) increased iNOS immunoreactivity (arrows) (group II). (F) Weak iNOS immunoreactivity (arrows) (group III) (immunostainig for iNOS, ×200).
Fig. 4A photomicrograph of section of aorta from group III showing positive immunofluorescent stem cells (arrows) within aorta.