Literature DB >> 26633900

Cervical Cancer Screening: Defining the Need for Research.

E Simoes1, S Brucker1, M W Beckmann2, O Ortmann3, C Albring4, D Wallwiener5.   

Abstract

With the development of a National Cancer Plan published in 2012, Germany has followed the recommendations of the WHO and the EU. The first area of action listed in Germany's National Cancer Plan is improving the early detection of cancer. Both citizens and medical specialists are encouraged to take responsibility themselves and contribute to the efforts being made to meet the challenge of cancer. Screening for cervical cancer has long been an integral part of the German Directive for the Early Detection of Cancer and now - following the recommendations given in the European Guideline - an organised screening approach shall be developed to maximise the benefits and minimise the risks through a partial reorganisation of existing structures. Before this can be rolled out nationwide, it will be necessary to check the feasibility and suitability of new contents and organisational structures. The Federal Joint Committee which is largely responsible for the process according to the draft law on the implementation of the National Cancer Plan has emphasised the importance of evidence-based medicine and of collaboration between the autonomous governing bodies within the healthcare system to obtain viable results. For medical specialists, the follow-on question is which areas will need more research in future. New process steps need to be developed and verified to see whether they offer evidence which will support defined approaches or whether such evidence needs to be newly compiled, e.g. by testing invitation procedures for screening in trial schemes. The experience gained during the implementation of the existing directive on early detection of cancer should be integrated into the new process. Research initiated by specialists could encourage the development of a new version of the Directive for the Early Detection of Cancer suitable for the Germany's healthcare system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical cancer; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN); gynaecology; screening

Year:  2013        PMID: 26633900      PMCID: PMC4647332          DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1328303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  10 in total

1.  Age-specific effectiveness of the Finnish cervical cancer screening programme.

Authors:  Stefan Lönnberg; Ahti Anttila; Tapio Luostarinen; Pekka Nieminen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Primary prevention of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Peter Brindle; Tom Fahey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-13

3.  Predictive Value of Class III D Cytological Diagnosis (Munich II, Low and Moderate Dysplasia) and Additional High-risk HPV Testing.

Authors:  P Ziemke
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Importance of HPV Genotyping for the Screening, Therapy and Management of Cervical Neoplasias.

Authors:  M Jentschke; P Soergel; P Hillemanns
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.915

5.  Screening: part 19 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.

Authors:  Claudia Spix; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 6.  Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Jose Jeronimo; Ana C Rodriguez; Sholom Wacholder
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-09-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care.

Authors:  Neil C Campbell; Elizabeth Murray; Janet Darbyshire; Jon Emery; Andrew Farmer; Frances Griffiths; Bruce Guthrie; Helen Lester; Phil Wilson; Ann Louise Kinmonth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-03

8.  Screening and cervical cancer cure: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Bengt Andrae; Therese M-L Andersson; Paul C Lambert; Levent Kemetli; Lena Silfverdal; Björn Strander; Walter Ryd; Joakim Dillner; Sven Törnberg; Pär Sparén
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-03-01

9.  Effectiveness of cervical screening with age: population based case-control study of prospectively recorded data.

Authors:  Peter Sasieni; Alejandra Castanon; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-28

10.  Does social disadvantage affect the validity of self-report for cervical cancer screening?

Authors:  Aisha K Lofters; Rahim Moineddin; Stephen W Hwang; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2013-01-17
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Postoperative Health-Related Quality of Life of Cervical Cancer Patients - A Comparison between the Wertheim-Meigs Operation and Total Mesometrial Resection (TMMR).

Authors:  E Sowa; S Kuhnt; A Hinz; C Schröder; T Deutsch; K Geue
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Gender stereotype susceptibility.

Authors:  Marina A Pavlova; Susanna Weber; Elisabeth Simoes; Alexander N Sokolov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.