| Literature DB >> 26633805 |
Marica Garziera1, Ettore Bidoli2, Erika Cecchin1, Enrico Mini3, Stefania Nobili4, Sara Lonardi5, Angela Buonadonna6, Domenico Errante7, Nicoletta Pella8, Mario D'Andrea9, Francesco De Marchi10, Antonino De Paoli11, Chiara Zanusso1, Elena De Mattia1, Renato Tassi3, Giuseppe Toffoli1.
Abstract
An important hallmark of CRC is the evasion of immune surveillance. HLA-G is a negative regulator of host's immune response. Overexpression of HLA-G protein in primary tumour CRC tissues has already been associated to worse prognosis; however a definition of the role of immunogenetic host background is still lacking. Germline polymorphisms in the 3'UTR region of HLA-G influence the magnitude of the protein by modulating HLA-G mRNA stability. Soluble HLA-G has been associated to 3'UTR +2960 Ins/Ins and +3035 C/T (lower levels) and +3187 G/G (high levels) genotypes. HLA-G 3'UTR SNPs have never been explored in CRC outcome. The purpose of this study was to investigate if common HLA-G 3'UTR polymorphisms have an impact on DFS and OS of 253 stage II-III CRC patients, after primary surgery and ADJ-CT based on FL. The 3'UTR was sequenced and SNPs were analyzed for their association with survival by Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox models; results underwent internal validation using a resampling method (bootstrap analysis). In a multivariate analysis, we estimated an association with improved DFS in Ins allele (Ins/Del +Ins/Ins) carriers (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.38-0.93, P = 0.023) and in patients with +3035 C/T genotype (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.26-0.99, P = 0.045). The +3187 G/G mutated carriers (G/G vs A/A+A/G) were associated to a worst prognosis in both DFS (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.19-5.05, P = 0.015) and OS (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.16-6.63, P = 0.022). Our study shows a prognostic and independent role of 3 HLA-G 3'UTR SNPs, +2960 14-bp INDEL, +3035 C>T, and +3187 A>G.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26633805 PMCID: PMC4669157 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144000
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients.
| Variables | N (%) | 5-years | Log-rank | 5-years | Log-rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFS % |
| OS % |
| ||
|
| |||||
| < 62.5 years | 122 (48) | 67 | 0.698 | 80 | 0.297 |
| > 62.5 years | 131 (52) | 63 | 76 | ||
|
| |||||
| Male | 140 (55) | 60 | 0.076 | 73 |
|
| Female | 113 (45) | 71 | 84 | ||
|
| |||||
| II | 72 (28) | 79 |
| 89 |
|
| III | 181 (72) | 60 | 73 | ||
|
| |||||
| Colon | 191 (76) | 67 | 0.435 | 81 |
|
| |
| ||||
| |
| ||||
| |
| ||||
| |
| ||||
| |
| ||||
| Rectum | 62 (24) | 61 | 0.522 | 68 | |
|
| |||||
| FL+OXA | 143 (56) | 66 | 0.512 | 78 | 0.629 |
| FL | 110 (44) | 64 | 77 | ||
|
| |||||
| | |||||
| Del/Del | 78 (31) | 54 |
| 70 | 0.231 |
| Ins/Del | 115 (45) | 70 | 79 | ||
| Ins/Ins | 60 (24) | 70 | 84 | ||
| Dominant Model | 175 (69) | 70 |
| 81 | 0.095 |
| Recessive Model | 60 (24) | 70 | 0.411 | 84 | 0.329 |
| | |||||
| T/T | 201 (79) | 66 | 0.725 | 77 | 0.996 |
| T/C | 47 (19) | 60 | 79 | ||
| C/C | 5 (2) | 80 | 80 | ||
| Dominant Model | 52 (21) | 63 | 0.667 | 80 | 0.935 |
| Recessive Model | 5 (2) | 80 | 0.600 | 80 | 0.985 |
| | |||||
| C/C | 94 (37) | 68 | 0.162 | 80 | 0.213 |
| C/G | 119 (47) | 67 | 80 | ||
| G/G | 40 (16) | 54 | 67 | ||
| Dominant Model | 159 (63) | 64 | 0.318 | 77 | 0.577 |
| Recessive Model | 40 (16) | 54 | 0.063 | 67 | 0.079 |
| | |||||
| C/C | 225 (89) | 63 | 0.176 | 78 | 0.684 |
| C/A | 27 (11) | 81 | 80 | ||
| | |||||
| C/C | 205 (81) | 63 |
| 77 | 0.367 |
| C/T | 47 (19) | 77 | 81 | ||
| | |||||
| G/G | 93 (37) | 68 | 0.113 | 79 | 0.226 |
| G/C | 119 (47) | 68 | 80 | ||
| C/C | 41 (16) | 52 | 67 | ||
| Dominant Model | 160 (63) | 64 | 0.366 | 77 | 0.627 |
| Recessive Model | 41 (16) | 52 |
| 67 | 0.085 |
| | |||||
| A/A | 145 (57) | 68 |
| 82 |
|
| A/G | 93 (37) | 65 | 76 | ||
| G/G | 15 (6) | 33 | 51 | ||
| Dominant Model | 108 (43) | 61 | 0.130 | 73 | 0.063 |
| Recessive Model | 15 (6) | 33 |
| 51 |
|
| | |||||
| C/C | 106 (42) | 60 | 0.062 | 72 | 0.191 |
| C/G | 107 (42) | 73 | 84 | ||
| G/G | 40 (16) | 59 | 79 | ||
| Dominant Model | 147 (58) | 69 | 0.074 | 82 | 0.076 |
| Recessive Model | 40 (16) | 59 | 0.417 | 79 | 0.773 |
DFS, Disease Free Survival; OS, Overall Survival; SNPs, Single nucleotide polymorphisms; FL, Fluoropirymidine; OXA, Oxaliplatin; significant values (≤0.05) are shown in bold.
1 P values (log-rank test) given for the genotypes, the dominant and/or the recessive models.
Fig 1Kaplan-Meier survival curves for Disease Free Survival and Overall Survival according to the genotypes.
(A) Disease Free Survival curve for the total of CRC patients. (B) Overall Survival curve for the total of CRC patients. (C) Disease Free Survival curve for the +2960 14-bp INDEL SNP according to the dominant model. (D) Disease Free Survival curve for the +3035 C>T SNP. (E) Disease Free Survival curve for the +3187 A>G SNP according to the recessive model. (F) Overall Survival curve for the +3187 A>G according to the recessive model.
Associations of HLA-G 3’UTR SNPs with disease free survival and overall survival in 253 stage II-III CRC patients.
| Disease Free Survival | Overall Survival | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| N | Relapses, N | Adjusted HR (95% CI) |
| Dead, N | Adjusted HR (95% CI) |
|
|
| |||||||
| Del/Del | 78 | 33 | 1 | - | 22 | 1 | - |
| Ins/Del | 115 | 32 |
|
| 23 | 0.72 (0.40–1.30) | 0.269 |
| Ins/Ins | 60 | 17 | 0.61 (0.34–1.10) | 0.097 | 11 | 0.63 (0.30–1.30) | 0.212 |
| Dominant model | 175 | 49 |
|
| 34 | 0.68 (0.40–1.18) | 0.171 |
| Recessive model ( | 60 | 17 | 0.82 (0.48–1.39) | 0.457 | 11 | 0.76 (0.39–1.46) | 0.406 |
|
| |||||||
| T/T | 201 | 64 | 1 | - | 45 | 1 | - |
| T/C | 47 | 17 | 1.26 (0.73–2.17) | 0.401 | 10 | 1.01 (0.51–2.03) | 0.968 |
| C/C | 5 | 1 | 0.72 (0.10–5.22) | 0.744 | 1 | 1.15 (0.16–8.42) | 0.895 |
| Dominant model | 52 | 18 | 1.21 (0.71–2.06) | 0.480 | 11 | 1.03 (0.53–2.00) | 0.942 |
| Recessive model | 5 | 1 | 0.69 (0.10–4.96) | 0.709 | 1 | 1.14 (0.16–8.36) | 0.896 |
|
| |||||||
| C/C | 94 | 27 | 1 | - | 19 | 1 | - |
| C/G | 119 | 38 | 1.11 (0.68–1.83) | 0.670 | 24 | 0.99 (0.54–1.82) | 0.973 |
| G/G | 40 | 17 | 1.63 (0.89–3.00) | 0.115 | 13 | 1.60 (0.78–3.26) | 0.197 |
| Dominant model | 159 | 55 | 1.24 (0.78–1.96) | 0.369 | 37 | 1.15 (0.66–2.00) | 0.632 |
| Recessive model | 40 | 17 | 1.54 (0.90–2.63) | 0.117 | 13 | 1.61 (0.86–3.02) | 0.140 |
|
| |||||||
| C/C | 225 | 77 | 1 | - | 50 | 1 | - |
| C/A | 27 | 5 | 0.54 (0.22–1.35) | 0.186 | 5 | 0.82 (0.33–2.05) | 0.666 |
|
| |||||||
| C/C | 205 | 72 | 1 | - | 47 | 1 | - |
| C/T | 47 | 10 |
|
| 8 | 0.66 (0.31–1.41) | 0.287 |
|
| |||||||
| G/G | 93 | 27 | 1 | - | 19 | 1 | - |
| G/C | 119 | 37 | 1.05 (0.64–1.72) | 0.860 | 24 | 0.96 (0.52–1.75) | 0.882 |
| C/C | 41 | 18 | 1.65 (0.90–3.00) | 0.103 | 13 | 1.54 (0.76–3.15) | 0.233 |
| Dominant model | 160 | 55 | 1.19 (0.75–1.89) | 0.465 | 37 | 1.10 (0.63–1.93) | 0.728 |
| Recessive model | 41 | 18 | 1.61 (0.95–2.71) | 0.078 | 13 | 1.59 (0.84–2.98) | 0.153 |
|
| |||||||
| A/A | 145 | 42 | 1 | - | 26 | 1 | - |
| A/G | 93 | 31 | 1.16 (0.73–1.86) | 0.529 | 23 | 1.26 (0.71–2.22) | 0.431 |
| G/G | 15 | 9 |
|
| 7 |
|
|
| Dominant model | 108 | 40 | 1.33 (0.86–2.05) | 0.205 | 30 | 1.46 (0.86–2.48) | 0.162 |
| Recessive model | 15 | 9 |
|
| 7 |
|
|
|
| |||||||
| C/C | 106 | 40 | 1 | - | 29 | 1 | - |
| C/G | 107 | 26 | 0.61 (0.37–1.02) | 0.059 | 18 | 0.68 (0.37–1.24) | 0.206 |
| G/G | 40 | 16 | 0.96 (0.54–1.72) | 0.899 | 9 | 0.72 (0.34–1.52) | 0.388 |
| Dominant model | 147 | 42 | 0.72 (0.46–1.12) | 0.142 | 27 | 0.69 (0.41–1.18) | 0.173 |
| Recessive model | 40 | 16 | 1.18 (0.68–2.05) | 0.559 | 9 | 0.84 (0.41–1.72) | 0.630 |
1HRs (Hazard Ratios) adjusted for age, sex, tumour stage, first tumour site and type of adjuvant chemotherapy (FL plus or without OXA). Significant values (≤0.05) are shown in bold.
Associations between HLA-G 3’UTR haplotypes with disease free survival and overall survival in 253 stage II-III CRC patients (N = 506).
| Disease Free Survival | Overall Survival | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| N | Relapses, N | Adjusted HR (95% CI) |
| Dead, N | Adjusted HR (95% CI) |
|
|
| |||||||
| InsTCCCGA | 180 | 42 | 1 | - | 26 | 1 | - |
| Het | 108 | 29 | 0.72 (0.44–1.18) | 0.197 | 19 | 0.76 (0.43–1.37) | 0.365 |
| Hom | 72 | 13 | 0.92 (0.49–1.73) | 0.803 | 7 | 0.68 (0.29–1.55) | 0.354 |
|
| |||||||
| DelT | 120 | 38 | 1 | - | 28 | 1 | - |
| Het | 90 | 29 | 1.08 (0.67–1.74) | 0.745 | 21 | 1.12 (0.63–1.99) | 0.699 |
| Hom | 30 | 9 |
|
| 7 |
|
|
|
| |||||||
| DelTCCCGACG | 66 | 21 | 1 | - | 14 | 1 | - |
| Het | 56 | 19 | 1.09 (0.65–1.82) | 0.753 | 13 | 1.11 (0.59–2.09) | 0.745 |
| Hom | 10 | 2 | 1.98 (0.48–8.19) | 0.347 | 1 | 1.15 (0.16–8.53) | 0.890 |
|
| |||||||
| Del | 55 | 17 | 1 | - | 11 | 1 | - |
| Het | 47 | 17 | 1.28 (0.74–2.19) | 0.375 | 11 | 1.18 (0.61–2.31) | 0.623 |
| Hom | 8 | 0 | - | - | 0 | - | - |
|
| |||||||
| InsTC | 27 | 4 | 1 | - | 5 | 1 | - |
| Het | 25 | 4 | 0.47 (0.17–1.29) | 0.144 | 4 | 0.76 (0.27–2.13) | 0.760 |
|
| |||||||
| InsTCC | 17 | 4 | 1 | - | 3 | 1 | - |
| Het | 17 | 4 | 0.56 (0.21–1.54) | 0.263 | 3 | 0.74 (0.23–2.39) | 0.617 |
|
| |||||||
| DelT | 15 | 3 | 1 | - | 2 | 1 | - |
| Het | 15 | 3 | 0.55 (0.17–1.74) | 0.307 | 2 | 0.57 (0.14–2.37) | 0.441 |
|
| |||||||
| InsTCCCGACG | 6 | 2 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
| Het | 4 | 2 | 1.91 (0.46–7.94) | 0.371 | 1 | 0.87 (0.12–6.37) | 0.893 |
|
| |||||||
| DelT | 6 | 3 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
| Het | 6 | 3 | 1.25 (0.38–4.16) | 0.715 | 1 | 0.58 (0.08–4.33) | 0.596 |
Het, haplotype in heterozygous state; Hom, haplotype in homozygous state; significant values (≤0.05) are shown in bold.
1 HLA-G 3’UTR haplotypes were reconstructed by PHASE method according to worldwide distributions46
2HRs (Hazard Ratios) adjusted for age, sex, tumour stage, first tumour site and type of adjuvant chemotherapy (FL plus or without OXA).