Literature DB >> 26632054

Using dual-energy x-ray imaging to enhance automated lung tumor tracking during real-time adaptive radiotherapy.

Martin J Menten1, Martin F Fast1, Simeon Nill1, Uwe Oelfke1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Real-time, markerless localization of lung tumors with kV imaging is often inhibited by ribs obscuring the tumor and poor soft-tissue contrast. This study investigates the use of dual-energy imaging, which can generate radiographs with reduced bone visibility, to enhance automated lung tumor tracking for real-time adaptive radiotherapy.
METHODS: kV images of an anthropomorphic breathing chest phantom were experimentally acquired and radiographs of actual lung cancer patients were Monte-Carlo-simulated at three imaging settings: low-energy (70 kVp, 1.5 mAs), high-energy (140 kVp, 2.5 mAs, 1 mm additional tin filtration), and clinical (120 kVp, 0.25 mAs). Regular dual-energy images were calculated by weighted logarithmic subtraction of high- and low-energy images and filter-free dual-energy images were generated from clinical and low-energy radiographs. The weighting factor to calculate the dual-energy images was determined by means of a novel objective score. The usefulness of dual-energy imaging for real-time tracking with an automated template matching algorithm was investigated.
RESULTS: Regular dual-energy imaging was able to increase tracking accuracy in left-right images of the anthropomorphic phantom as well as in 7 out of 24 investigated patient cases. Tracking accuracy remained comparable in three cases and decreased in five cases. Filter-free dual-energy imaging was only able to increase accuracy in 2 out of 24 cases. In four cases no change in accuracy was observed and tracking accuracy worsened in nine cases. In 9 out of 24 cases, it was not possible to define a tracking template due to poor soft-tissue contrast regardless of input images. The mean localization errors using clinical, regular dual-energy, and filter-free dual-energy radiographs were 3.85, 3.32, and 5.24 mm, respectively. Tracking success was dependent on tumor position, tumor size, imaging beam angle, and patient size.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has highlighted the influence of patient anatomy on the success rate of real-time markerless tumor tracking using dual-energy imaging. Additionally, the importance of the spectral separation of the imaging beams used to generate the dual-energy images has been shown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26632054     DOI: 10.1118/1.4935431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of a template-based algorithm for markerless lung tumour localization on single- and dual-energy kilovoltage images.

Authors:  Alec M Block; Rakesh Patel; Murat Surucu; Matthew M Harkenrider; John C Roeske
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Characterization and potential applications of a dual-layer flat-panel detector.

Authors:  Linxi Shi; Minghui Lu; N Robert Bennett; Edward Shapiro; Jin Zhang; Richard Colbeth; Josh Star-Lack; Adam S Wang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A Bayesian approach for three-dimensional markerless tumor tracking using kV imaging during lung radiotherapy.

Authors:  Chun-Chien Shieh; Vincent Caillet; Michelle Dunbar; Paul J Keall; Jeremy T Booth; Nicholas Hardcastle; Carol Haddad; Thomas Eade; Ilana Feain
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  The markerless lung target tracking AAPM Grand Challenge (MATCH) results.

Authors:  Marco Mueller; Per Poulsen; Rune Hansen; Wilko Verbakel; Ross Berbeco; Dianne Ferguson; Shinichiro Mori; Lei Ren; John C Roeske; Lei Wang; Pengpeng Zhang; Paul Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Adaptive weighted log subtraction based on neural networks for markerless tumor tracking using dual-energy fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Maksat Haytmyradov; Hassan Mostafavi; Roberto Cassetta; Rakesh Patel; Murat Surucu; Liangjia Zhu; John C Roeske
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A novel bone suppression algorithm in intensity-based 2D/3D image registration for real-time tumor motion monitoring: Development and phantom-based validation.

Authors:  Ingo Gulyas; Petra Trnkova; Barbara Knäusl; Joachim Widder; Dietmar Georg; Andreas Renner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.506

7.  Tumour auto-contouring on 2d cine MRI for locally advanced lung cancer: A comparative study.

Authors:  Martin F Fast; Björn Eiben; Martin J Menten; Andreas Wetscherek; David J Hawkes; Jamie R McClelland; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 6.280

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.