Mirjana Josipovic1, Gitte F Persson2, Jenny Dueck3, Jens Peter Bangsgaard2, Gunnar Westman2, Lena Specht4, Marianne C Aznar5. 1. Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Niels Bohr Institute, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: mirjana.josipovic@regionh.dk. 2. Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Niels Bohr Institute, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland. 4. Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. 5. Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Niels Bohr Institute, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) increases lung volume and can potentially reduce treatment-related toxicity in locally advanced lung cancer. We estimated geometric uncertainties in visually guided voluntary DIBH and derived the appropriate treatment margins for different image-guidance strategies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen patients were included prospectively. An optical marker-based respiratory monitoring with visual guidance enabled comfortable DIBHs, adjusted to each patient's performance. All patients had three consecutive DIBH CTs at each of the treatment fractions 2, 16 and 31. DIBH reproducibility was evaluated as inter- and intra-fractional variations in lung volume, tumour position and differential motion between primary tumour and mediastinal lymph nodes. RESULTS: Lung volume increased by median 60% in DIBH. Inter- and intra-fractional lung volume variations were median 2.1% and 1.1%, respectively. Inter- and intra-fractional uncertainties in 3D tumour position were 4.8 ± 2.8 mm and 1.7 ± 1.4 mm (mean ± SD). Inter- and intra-fractional differential motion was 4.8 ± 3.3 mm and 0.0 ± 1.1 mm. CONCLUSIONS: For single targets, visually guided voluntary DIBH radiotherapy is highly reproducible provided an image-guidance strategy with tumour registration is performed. If the primary tumour is separated from the mediastinal lymph nodes, inter-fractional differential motion remains a challenge and margins must be adapted to reflect the image registration strategy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) increases lung volume and can potentially reduce treatment-related toxicity in locally advanced lung cancer. We estimated geometric uncertainties in visually guided voluntary DIBH and derived the appropriate treatment margins for different image-guidance strategies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen patients were included prospectively. An optical marker-based respiratory monitoring with visual guidance enabled comfortable DIBHs, adjusted to each patient's performance. All patients had three consecutive DIBH CTs at each of the treatment fractions 2, 16 and 31. DIBH reproducibility was evaluated as inter- and intra-fractional variations in lung volume, tumour position and differential motion between primary tumour and mediastinal lymph nodes. RESULTS: Lung volume increased by median 60% in DIBH. Inter- and intra-fractional lung volume variations were median 2.1% and 1.1%, respectively. Inter- and intra-fractional uncertainties in 3D tumour position were 4.8 ± 2.8 mm and 1.7 ± 1.4 mm (mean ± SD). Inter- and intra-fractional differential motion was 4.8 ± 3.3 mm and 0.0 ± 1.1 mm. CONCLUSIONS: For single targets, visually guided voluntary DIBH radiotherapy is highly reproducible provided an image-guidance strategy with tumour registration is performed. If the primary tumour is separated from the mediastinal lymph nodes, inter-fractional differential motion remains a challenge and margins must be adapted to reflect the image registration strategy.
Authors: Alejandro Prado; Daniel Zucca; Miguel Ángel De la Casa; Jaime Martí; Leyre Alonso; Paz García de Acilu; Juan García; Ovidio Hernando; Pedro Fernández-Letón; Carmen Rubio Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Date: 2022-04-29
Authors: Lotte Nygård; Marianne C Aznar; Barbara M Fischer; Gitte F Persson; Charlotte B Christensen; Flemming L Andersen; Mirjana Josipovic; Seppo W Langer; Andreas Kjær; Ivan R Vogelius; Søren M Bentzen Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-04-25
Authors: Sarah Han-Oh; Colin Hill; Ken Kang-Hsin Wang; Kai Ding; Jean L Wright; Sara Alcorn; Jeffrey Meyer; Joseph Herman; Amol Narang Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-01-22
Authors: Dennis Mah; Ellen Yorke; Entela Zemanaj; Zhiqiang Han; Haoyang Liu; Jobin George; Jason Lambiase; Christian Czmielewski; D Michael Lovelock; Andreas Rimner; Annemarie F Shepherd Journal: Med Dosim Date: 2021-08-21 Impact factor: 1.531
Authors: Alisha Duetschler; Grzegorz Bauman; Oliver Bieri; Philippe C Cattin; Stefanie Ehrbar; Georg Engin-Deniz; Alina Giger; Mirjana Josipovic; Christoph Jud; Miriam Krieger; Damien Nguyen; Gitte F Persson; Rares Salomir; Damien C Weber; Antony J Lomax; Ye Zhang Journal: Med Phys Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 4.506
Authors: Mirjana Josipovic; Marianne C Aznar; Jakob B Thomsen; Jonas Scherman; Sidsel Ms Damkjaer; Lotte Nygård; Lena Specht; Mette Pøhl; Gitte F Persson Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Dominik Alexander Hering; Kai Kröger; Ralf W Bauer; Hans Theodor Eich; Uwe Haverkamp Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 3.039