Literature DB >> 26630418

Influence of the Number of Cervical Fusion Levels on Cervical Spine Motion and Health-Related Quality of Life.

Sang-Hun Lee1, Jae Chul Lee, Ryoji Tauchi, K Daniel Riew.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the influence of the number of cervical fusion levels on total cervical motion and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with solid anterior cervical fusions (ACFs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies have analyzed the degree to which cervical range of motion (ROM) and HRQoL are affected by the number of cervical fusion segments.
METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of patients who underwent ACF for degenerative disc disease. To assess the clinical outcomes and HRQoL, preoperative, 1- and 2-year postoperative neck and arm pain, visual-analogue scale, neck disability index, and short form-36 were analyzed. Radiographically, C2-7 and C0-2 ROM, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and Kellgren grade of radiographic adjacent segment pathology (RASP) were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 105 patients (M:F = 46:59, mean age of 51.4 yr) were enrolled. There were 36 patients who underwent single-level ACF (group 1), 41 patients who had a double level ACF (group 2), and 28 patients who underwent ACF involving 3 or more levels (group 3). There was no decrease in C2-7 motion in group 1, a mean 7-degree decrease in group 2, a mean 18-degree decrease in those who underwent a 3-level ACF, and a mean 22-degree decrease after 4-level ACF. The grade of RASP was not influenced by the number of fusion levels. All HRQoL parameters showed no significant correlation between number of fusion levels, cervical ROM, and SVA.
CONCLUSION: Single-level ACF showed no decrease in total cervical motion; multilevel ACF decreased cervical motion by a mean of 7.8 degrees per segment of fusion. Progression of RASP showed no correlation with the number of fusion levels. HRQoLs were not influenced by the number of fusion levels, cervical ROM, or SVA after solid ACF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26630418     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

1.  Débridement and Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Sagittal Alignment in Kyphotic Cervical Spinal Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Zhimin Pan; Jiaquan Luo; Limin Yu; Yiwei Chen; Junlong Zhong; Zhiyun Li; Zhaoxun Zeng; Pingguo Duan; Yoon Ha; Kai Cao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Reliability and validity of CODA motion analysis system for measuring cervical range of motion in patients with cervical spondylosis and anterior cervical fusion.

Authors:  Zhongyang Gao; Hui Song; Fenggang Ren; Yuhuan Li; Dong Wang; Xijing He
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Minimally Invasive Full-endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy and Discectomy: Introducing a Simple and Useful Localization Technique of the "V" Point.

Authors:  Guibin Zhong; Fan Feng; Xinjin Su; Xiuyuan Chen; Junduo Zhao; Hongxing Shen; Jianwei Chen; Lifeng Lao
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  One-Level Versus 2-Level Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Fusion: Outcomes Up to 7 Years.

Authors:  Matthew F Gornet; Todd H Lanman; J Kenneth Burkus; Scott D Hodges; Jeffrey R McConnell; Randall F Dryer; Francine W Schranck; Anne G Copay
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.