Literature DB >> 26630417

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Conservative Treatment in Aged Patients With Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.

Er-Zhu Yang1, Jian-Guang Xu, Gao-Zhong Huang, Wen-Zhen Xiao, Xiao-Kang Liu, Bing-Fang Zeng, Xiao-Feng Lian.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective randomized clinical trial.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we determine whether percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) offers extra benefits to aged patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) over conservative therapy (CV). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: OVCFs are common in the aged population with osteoporosis. While the optimal treatment of aged patients with acute OVCFs remains controversial, PVP, a minimally invasive procedure, is a treatment option to be considered.
METHODS: Patients aged at 70 years or above with acute OVCF and severe pain from minor or mild trauma were assigned randomly to PVP and CV groups. The primary outcome was pain relief as measured by VAS score in 1-year follow-up period. The second outcome was quality of life assessed with ODI and Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Patient satisfaction surveys were also recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 135 patients were enrolled, and 107 (56 in PVP group; 51 in CV group) completed 1-year follow-up. In PVP group, the vertebroplasty procedure was performed at a mean of 8.4 ± 4.6 days (range, 2-21 days) after onset. Vertebroplasty resulted in much greater pain relief than did conservative treatment at postoperative day 1 (P < 0.0001). At every time point of follow-up, pain relief and quality of life were significantly improved in PVP group than in CV group at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year (all P < 0.0001). The final follow-up surveys indicated that patients in PVP group were significantly more satisfied with given treatment (P < 0.0001). In addition, lower rate of complications was observed in PVP group (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: In aged patients with acute OVCF and severe pain, early vertebroplasty yielded faster, better pain relief and improved functional outcomes, which were maintained for 1 year. Furthermore, it showed fewer complications than conservative treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26630417     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  34 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Techniques in Osteoporotic and Traumatic Fractures.

Authors:  Valérie Bousson; Bassam Hamze; Guillaume Odri; Thomas Funck-Brentano; Philippe Orcel; Jean-Denis Laredo
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Letter to the Editor concerning "Osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures: long-term retrospective comparison between vertebroplasty and conservative treatment" by K. Martikos et al. [Eur Spine J (2018) doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5605-1].

Authors:  Mario Ganau; So Kato; Yasushi Oshima
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  What is the role of vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic fractures? A review of the recent literature.

Authors:  Stefano Marcia; Mario Muto; Joshua A Hirsch; Ronil V Chandra; Nicole Carter; Paola Crivelli; Emanuele Piras; Luca Saba
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Comment on Andrei Diana et al.: The variability of vertebral body volume and pain associated with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: conservative treatment versus percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty.

Authors:  XiaoFeng Liu; HuiMing Wu; KuiXian Zhang; LiYuan Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Reply to comment on Andrei et al.: The variability of vertebral body volume and pain associated with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: conservative treatment versus percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Iulian Popa
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Utilization of Vertebral Augmentation Procedures in the USA: a Comparative Analysis in Medicare Fee-for-Service Population Pre- and Post-2009 Trials.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Jaya Sanapati; Vidyasagar Pampati; Alan D Kaye; Joshua A Hirsch
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2020-04-14

7.  Which is the best treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: balloon kyphoplasty, percutaneous vertebroplasty, or non-surgical treatment? A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  R-S Zhu; S-L Kan; G-Z Ning; L-X Chen; Z-G Cao; Z-H Jiang; X-L Zhang; W Hu
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Current Concepts in the Management of Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Dylan Hoyt; Ivan Urits; Vwaire Orhurhu; Mariam Salisu Orhurhu; Jessica Callan; Jordan Powell; Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Alan D Kaye; Rachel J Kaye; Omar Viswanath
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2020-03-20

9.  The outcomes of percutaneous kyphoplasty in treatment of the secondary osteoporotic vertebral compression factures: a case-control study.

Authors:  Ai-Min Wu; Xun-Lin Li; Xiao-Bin Li; Kai Zhang; Xiao-Jiang Sun; Chang-Qing Zhao; Shen Wang; Qi-Shan Huang; Yan Lin; Wen-Fei Ni; Xiang-Yang Wang; Jie Zhao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

10.  Cement bridging phenomenon in percutaneous vertebroplasty for adjacent vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Yun-Da Li; Tsung-Ting Tsai; Chi-Chien Niu; Po-Liang Lai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.