Literature DB >> 26630416

Preoperative MRI in Patients With Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication: Relevance for Diagnosis and Prognosis.

Wouter A Moojen1,2, Catharina D Schenck1, Geert J Lycklama À Nijeholt3, Wilco C H Jacobs1, Bas F Van der Kallen3, Mark P Arts2, Wilco C Peul1,2, Carmen L A M Vleggeert-Lankamp1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: We studied baseline magnetic resonance images of 155 patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication and lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and patient data were gathered from participants of a randomized trial.
OBJECTIVE: It is believed that the narrowness of the lumbar spinal canal correlates to the severity of complaints and that it may be a good predictor of clinical outcome if treated. However, this hypothesis has never been (prospectively) tested. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: MRI is an important tool to confirm the diagnosis of LSS as a cause for intermittent neurogenic claudication.
METHODS: Three raters were asked to evaluate the magnetic resonance images (Schizas scale). Symptom severities at baseline and 1-year follow-up were quantified. The radiological scores were correlated with clinical baseline and outcome scores to assess diagnostic and prognostic value of MRI findings at baseline.
RESULTS: There was good agreement on the clinically relevant level of LSS (kappa range 0.57-0.64). MRI assessment of grading of compression (kappa 0.33-0.46) did not correlate with baseline MRDQ nor with outcome based on postoperative change in MRDQ (P = 0.61). However, both absence of epidural fat and presence of tortuous caudal nerves on magnetic resonance images (kappa 0.53-0.72 and 0.67-0.70) in patients with LSS were relatively good predictors for satisfactory recovery after surgery (P = 0.03 and P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The grading of compression on the preoperative MRI is neither ambiguous nor correlating to severity of clinical condition. It does, furthermore, not have the ability to predict the outcome after 1 year if surgically treated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 26630416     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnostics and conservative treatment of cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  A Hug; S Hähnel; N Weidner
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Severity by CT or MRI Does Not Predict Response to Epidural Corticosteroid versus Lidocaine Injections.

Authors:  F A Perez; S Quinet; J G Jarvik; Q T Nguyen; E Aghayev; D Jitjai; W D Hwang; E R Jarvik; S S Nedeljkovic; A L Avins; J M Schwalb; F E Diehn; C J Standaert; D R Nerenz; T Annaswamy; Z Bauer; D Haynor; P J Heagerty; J L Friedly
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Dural sac cross-sectional area and morphological grade show significant associations with patient-rated outcome of surgery for lumbar central spinal stenosis.

Authors:  A F Mannion; T F Fekete; D Pacifico; D O'Riordan; S Nauer; M von Büren; C Schizas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparative effectiveness and prognostic factors for outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in an elderly population: protocol for an observational study.

Authors:  Helle Algren Brøgger; Thomas Maribo; Robin Christensen; Berit Schiøttz-Christensen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Physical Predictors of Favorable Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Laminectomy or Laminotomy for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Andrée-Anne Marchand; Mariève Houle; Julie O'Shaughnessy; Claude-Édouard Châtillon; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Magnitude of Dural Tube Compression Still Does Not Show a Predictive Value for Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis for Six-Year Follow-Up: A Longitudinal Observation Study in the Community.

Authors:  Koji Otani; Shin-Ichi Kikuchi; Takuya Nikaido; Shin-Ichi Konno
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  The cervical sagittal curvature change in patients with or without PCSM after laminoplasty.

Authors:  Shengjun Qian; Zhan Wang; Ying Ren; Ian Chew; Guangyao Jiang; Wanli Li; Weishan Chen
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.