PURPOSE: We measured reproducibility of speckle-noise freed fluid and tissue compartmentalization of the choroid (choroidal angiography and tissue characterization). METHODS: This study included 26 eyes of 13 healthy females: 13 were used for repeated measurements and 13 were used for side comparison. A semiautomated algorithm removed speckle-noise with structure preservation. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation (ICC), with respect to reproducibility of the method, showed an ICC for choroidal fluid inner space analysis (FISA) of 95.15% (90.01-98.24). The ICC of tissue inner space analysis (TISA) was 99.75% (99.47-99.91). The total choroid ratio (TCR), calculated from volumes of tissue to vessels, showed an ICC of 88.84% (78.28-95.82). Comparison of eyes (left to right) showed a difference for FISA of 0.033 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.0018-0.0680, P = 0.063), TISA -0.118 (CI -0.2373-0.0023, P = 0.055), and TCR -0.590 (CI -0.9047 to -0.2754, P = 0.004). The ICC for FISA and TISA showed a trend in the difference comparing left and right eyes; however, TCR showed a significant difference between the eyes in the measured area (P < 0.001). Mean overall FISA was 0.58 mm3 (range, 0.25-0.98 mm3, SD = 0.14). Mean TISA was 3.45 mm3 (range, 2.38-5.0 mm3, SD 0.072). Mean TCR was 6.13 (overall range, 3.93-10.2, SD = 1.34). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in choroidal layers between subjects were found mainly due to alterations in choroidal tissue. Reproducibility of speckle-noise freed choroidal angiography appeared excellent. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Speckle noise is a granular "noise" that appears in a wide range of medical imaging methods as ultrasonography, magnetic resonance, computer tomography, or optical coherence tomography (OCT). Findings from basic science about speckle noise were translated into a novel, medical image postprocessing application that can separate signal from speckle noise with structure preservation with high reproducibility and enhance medical imaging.
PURPOSE: We measured reproducibility of speckle-noise freed fluid and tissue compartmentalization of the choroid (choroidal angiography and tissue characterization). METHODS: This study included 26 eyes of 13 healthy females: 13 were used for repeated measurements and 13 were used for side comparison. A semiautomated algorithm removed speckle-noise with structure preservation. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation (ICC), with respect to reproducibility of the method, showed an ICC for choroidal fluid inner space analysis (FISA) of 95.15% (90.01-98.24). The ICC of tissue inner space analysis (TISA) was 99.75% (99.47-99.91). The total choroid ratio (TCR), calculated from volumes of tissue to vessels, showed an ICC of 88.84% (78.28-95.82). Comparison of eyes (left to right) showed a difference for FISA of 0.033 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.0018-0.0680, P = 0.063), TISA -0.118 (CI -0.2373-0.0023, P = 0.055), and TCR -0.590 (CI -0.9047 to -0.2754, P = 0.004). The ICC for FISA and TISA showed a trend in the difference comparing left and right eyes; however, TCR showed a significant difference between the eyes in the measured area (P < 0.001). Mean overall FISA was 0.58 mm3 (range, 0.25-0.98 mm3, SD = 0.14). Mean TISA was 3.45 mm3 (range, 2.38-5.0 mm3, SD 0.072). Mean TCR was 6.13 (overall range, 3.93-10.2, SD = 1.34). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in choroidal layers between subjects were found mainly due to alterations in choroidal tissue. Reproducibility of speckle-noise freed choroidal angiography appeared excellent. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Speckle noise is a granular "noise" that appears in a wide range of medical imaging methods as ultrasonography, magnetic resonance, computer tomography, or optical coherence tomography (OCT). Findings from basic science about speckle noise were translated into a novel, medical image postprocessing application that can separate signal from speckle noise with structure preservation with high reproducibility and enhance medical imaging.
Authors: Richard A Stone; Graham E Quinn; Ellie L Francis; Gui-shuang Ying; D Ian Flitcroft; Parag Parekh; Jamin Brown; Joshua Orlow; Gregor Schmid Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Marieh Esmaeelpour; Boris Považay; Boris Hermann; Bernd Hofer; Vedran Kajic; Sarah L Hale; Rachel V North; Wolfgang Drexler; Nik J L Sheen Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Peter M Maloca; Richard F Spaide; Emanuel Ramos de Carvalho; Harald P Studer; Pascal W Hasler; Hendrik P N Scholl; Tjebo F C Heeren; Julia Schottenhamml; Konstantinos Balaskas; Adnan Tufail; Catherine Egan Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Joshua Muller; David Alonso-Caneiro; Scott A Read; Stephen J Vincent; Michael J Collins Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 3.283