AIM: To identify non-quinazoline kinase inhibitors effective against drug resistant mutants of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). METHODS: A kinase inhibitor library was subjected to screening for specific inhibition pertaining to the in vitro kinase activation of EGFR with the gatekeeper mutation T790M, which is resistant to small molecular weight tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for EGFR in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). This inhibitory effect was confirmed by measuring autophosphorylation of EGFR T790M/L858R in NCI-H1975 cells, an NSCLC cell line harboring the gatekeeper mutation. The effects of a candidate compound, Janus kinase 3 (JAK3) inhibitor VI, on cell proliferation were evaluated using the MTT assay and were compared between T790M-positive and -negative lung cancer cell lines. JAK3 inhibitor VI was modeled into the ATP-binding pocket of EGFR T790M/L858R. Potential physical interactions between the compound and kinase domains of wild-type (WT) or mutant EGFRs or JAK3 were estimated by calculating binding energy. The gatekeeper residues of EGFRs and JAKs were aligned to discuss the similarities among EGFR T790M and JAKs. RESULTS: We found that JAK3 inhibitor VI, a known inhibitor for JAK3 tyrosine kinase, selectively inhibits EGFR T790M/L858R, but has weaker inhibitory effects on the WT EGFR in vitro. JAK3 inhibitor VI also specifically reduced autophosphorylation of EGFR T790M/L858R in NCI-H1975 cells upon EGF stimulation, but did not show the inhibitory effect on WT EGFR in A431 cells. Furthermore, JAK3 inhibitor VI suppressed the proliferation of NCI-H1975 cells, but showed limited inhibitory effects on the WT EGFR-expressing cell lines A431 and A549. A docking simulation between JAK3 inhibitor VI and the ATP-binding pocket of EGFR T790M/L858R predicted a potential binding status with hydrogen bonds. Estimated binding energy of JAK3 inhibitor VI to EGFR T790M/L858R was more stable than its binding energy to the WT EGFR. Amino acid sequence alignments revealed that the gatekeeper residues of JAK family kinases are methionine in WT, similar to EGFR T790M, suggesting that TKIs for JAKs may also be effective for EGFR T790M. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that JAK3 inhibitor VI is a gatekeeper mutant selective TKI and offer a strategy to search for new EGFR T790M inhibitors.
AIM: To identify non-quinazoline kinase inhibitors effective against drug resistant mutants of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). METHODS: A kinase inhibitor library was subjected to screening for specific inhibition pertaining to the in vitro kinase activation of EGFR with the gatekeeper mutation T790M, which is resistant to small molecular weight tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for EGFR in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). This inhibitory effect was confirmed by measuring autophosphorylation of EGFRT790M/L858R in NCI-H1975 cells, an NSCLC cell line harboring the gatekeeper mutation. The effects of a candidate compound, Janus kinase 3 (JAK3) inhibitor VI, on cell proliferation were evaluated using the MTT assay and were compared between T790M-positive and -negative lung cancer cell lines. JAK3 inhibitor VI was modeled into the ATP-binding pocket of EGFRT790M/L858R. Potential physical interactions between the compound and kinase domains of wild-type (WT) or mutant EGFRs or JAK3 were estimated by calculating binding energy. The gatekeeper residues of EGFRs and JAKs were aligned to discuss the similarities among EGFRT790M and JAKs. RESULTS: We found that JAK3 inhibitor VI, a known inhibitor for JAK3 tyrosine kinase, selectively inhibits EGFRT790M/L858R, but has weaker inhibitory effects on the WT EGFR in vitro. JAK3 inhibitor VI also specifically reduced autophosphorylation of EGFRT790M/L858R in NCI-H1975 cells upon EGF stimulation, but did not show the inhibitory effect on WT EGFR in A431 cells. Furthermore, JAK3 inhibitor VI suppressed the proliferation of NCI-H1975 cells, but showed limited inhibitory effects on the WT EGFR-expressing cell lines A431 and A549. A docking simulation between JAK3 inhibitor VI and the ATP-binding pocket of EGFRT790M/L858R predicted a potential binding status with hydrogen bonds. Estimated binding energy of JAK3 inhibitor VI to EGFRT790M/L858R was more stable than its binding energy to the WT EGFR. Amino acid sequence alignments revealed that the gatekeeper residues of JAK family kinases are methionine in WT, similar to EGFRT790M, suggesting that TKIs for JAKs may also be effective for EGFRT790M. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that JAK3 inhibitor VI is a gatekeeper mutant selective TKI and offer a strategy to search for new EGFRT790M inhibitors.
Authors: Christopher Adams; David J Aldous; Shelley Amendola; Paul Bamborough; Colin Bright; Sarah Crowe; Paul Eastwood; Garry Fenton; Martyn Foster; Trevor K P Harrison; Sue King; Justine Lai; Christopher Lawrence; Jean-Philippe Letallec; Clive McCarthy; Neil Moorcroft; Kenneth Page; Sudha Rao; Jane Redford; Shazia Sadiq; Keith Smith; John E Souness; Sukanthini Thurairatnam; Mark Vine; Barry Wyman Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Lecia V Sequist; Benjamin Besse; Thomas J Lynch; Vincent A Miller; Kwok K Wong; Barbara Gitlitz; Keith Eaton; Charles Zacharchuk; Amy Freyman; Christine Powell; Revathi Ananthakrishnan; Susan Quinn; Jean-Charles Soria Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Suresh S Ramalingam; Fiona Blackhall; Maciej Krzakowski; Carlos H Barrios; Keunchil Park; Isabel Bover; Dae Seog Heo; Rafael Rosell; Denis C Talbot; Richard Frank; Stephen P Letrent; Ana Ruiz-Garcia; Ian Taylor; Jane Q Liang; Alicyn K Campbell; Joseph O'Connell; Michael Boyer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-07-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rafael Rosell; Teresa Moran; Cristina Queralt; Rut Porta; Felipe Cardenal; Carlos Camps; Margarita Majem; Guillermo Lopez-Vivanco; Dolores Isla; Mariano Provencio; Amelia Insa; Bartomeu Massuti; Jose Luis Gonzalez-Larriba; Luis Paz-Ares; Isabel Bover; Rosario Garcia-Campelo; Miguel Angel Moreno; Silvia Catot; Christian Rolfo; Noemi Reguart; Ramon Palmero; José Miguel Sánchez; Roman Bastus; Clara Mayo; Jordi Bertran-Alamillo; Miguel Angel Molina; Jose Javier Sanchez; Miquel Taron Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson Journal: J Comput Chem Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.376
Authors: Danan Li; Takeshi Shimamura; Hongbin Ji; Liang Chen; Henry J Haringsma; Kate McNamara; Mei-Chih Liang; Samanthi A Perera; Sara Zaghlul; Christa L Borgman; Shigeto Kubo; Masaya Takahashi; Yanping Sun; Lucian R Chirieac; Robert F Padera; Neal I Lindeman; Pasi A Jänne; Roman K Thomas; Matthew L Meyerson; Michael J Eck; Jeffrey A Engelman; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Kwok-Kin Wong Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Wenjun Zhou; Dalia Ercan; Liang Chen; Cai-Hong Yun; Danan Li; Marzia Capelletti; Alexis B Cortot; Lucian Chirieac; Roxana E Iacob; Robert Padera; John R Engen; Kwok-Kin Wong; Michael J Eck; Nathanael S Gray; Pasi A Jänne Journal: Nature Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Matthew A Young; Neil P Shah; Luke H Chao; Markus Seeliger; Zdravko V Milanov; William H Biggs; Daniel K Treiber; Hitesh K Patel; Patrick P Zarrinkar; David J Lockhart; Charles L Sawyers; John Kuriyan Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Alexander Gress; Vasily Ramensky; Joachim Büch; Andreas Keller; Olga V Kalinina Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 16.971