Literature DB >> 26627764

Combined neural and behavioural measures of temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.

Robert P Carlyon1, John M Deeks1.   

Abstract

Four experiments measured the perceptual and neural correlates of the temporal pattern of electrical stimulation applied to one cochlear-implant (CI) electrode, for several subjects. Neural effects were estimated from the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) to each pulse. Experiment 1 attenuated every second pulse of a 200-pps pulse train. Increasing attenuation caused pitch to drop and the ECAP to become amplitude modulated, thereby providing an estimate of the relationship between neural modulation and pitch. Experiment 2 showed that the pitch of a 200-pps pulse train can be reduced by delaying every second pulse, so that the inter-pulse-intervals alternate between longer and shorter intervals. This caused the ECAP to become amplitude modulated, but not by enough to account for the change in pitch. Experiment 3 replicated the finding that rate discrimination deteriorates with increases in baseline rate. This was accompanied by an increase in ECAP modulation, but by an amount that produced only a small effect on pitch in experiment 1. Experiment 4 showed that preceding a pulse train with a carefully selected "pre-pulse" could reduce ECAP modulation, but did not improve rate discrimination. Implications for theories of pitch and for limitations of pitch perception in CI users are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26627764     DOI: 10.1121/1.4934275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Juliana Mathews; Lixue Dong
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Changes in the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential over time After Implantation and Subsequent Deafening in Guinea Pigs.

Authors:  Dyan Ramekers; Heval Benav; Sjaak F L Klis; Huib Versnel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-10

3.  Rate discrimination, gap detection and ranking of temporal pitch in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Stefano Cosentino; Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks; Wendy Parkinson; Julie A Bierer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-21

Review 4.  The Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential: From Laboratory to Clinic.

Authors:  Shuman He; Holly F B Teagle; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Evaluation of Possible Effects of a Potassium Channel Modulator on Temporal Processing by Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks; François Guérit; Wiebke Lamping; Alexander J Billig; Charles H Large; Shakeel R Saeed; Peter Harris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-19

6.  Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Detection Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Users: Relationships with Average Threshold, Gap Detection, and Rate Discrimination.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Stefano Cosentino; John M Deeks; Wendy Parkinson; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-07

7.  Using Interleaved Stimulation to Measure the Size and Selectivity of the Sustained Phase-Locked Neural Response to Cochlear Implant Stimulation.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; François Guérit; John M Deeks; Andrew Harland; Robin Gransier; Jan Wouters; Simone R de Rijk; Manohar Bance
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-25

Review 8.  Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Tobias Goehring
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-25

9.  Modulation Depth Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Jessica J M Monaghan; Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.