Literature DB >> 26626492

Comparison of Thermal Safety Practice Guidelines for Diagnostic Ultrasound Exposures.

Gerald R Harris1, Charles C Church2, Diane Dalecki3, Marvin C Ziskin4, Jennifer E Bagley5.   

Abstract

This article examines the historical evolution of various practice guidelines designed to minimize the possibility of thermal injury during a diagnostic ultrasound examination, including those published by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, British Medical Ultrasound Society and Health Canada. The guidelines for prenatal/neonatal examinations are in general agreement, but significant differences were found for postnatal exposures. We propose sets of thermal index versus exposure time for these examination categories below which there is reasonable assurance that an examination can be conducted without risk of producing an adverse thermal effect under any scanning conditions. If it is necessary to exceed these guidelines, the occurrence of an adverse thermal event is still unlikely in most situations because of mitigating factors such as transducer movement and perfusion, but the general principle of "as low as reasonably achievable" should be followed. Some limitations of the biological effects studies underpinning the guidelines also are discussed briefly.
Copyright © 2016 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bio-effects; Fetal; Output display standard; Thermal index; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26626492     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  6 in total

1.  Ultrasonic measurement of sound velocity fluctuations in biological tissue due to ultrasonic heating and estimation of thermo-physical properties.

Authors:  Yukako Tsujimoto; Mai Morimoto; Naotaka Nitta; Iwaki Akiyama
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Note to Physicians and Sonographers on Potential Underestimation of Acoustic Safety Indexes for Diagnostic Array Transducers.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Shahram Vaezy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part I: Theory and Impact on Diagnostic Safety Indexes.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  In vitro characterisation of ultrasound-induced heating effects in the mother and fetus: A clinical perspective.

Authors:  Stephanie F Smith; Piero Miloro; Richard Axell; Gail Ter Haar; Christoph Lees
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2020-09-14

5.  Double-Strand Breaks in Genome-Sized DNA Caused by Ultrasound.

Authors:  Rinko Kubota; Yusuke Yamashita; Takahiro Kenmotsu; Yuko Yoshikawa; Kenji Yoshida; Yoshiaki Watanabe; Tadayuki Imanaka; Kenichi Yoshikawa
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.102

6.  Optimal cerebral perfusion pressure via transcranial Doppler in TBI: application of robotic technology.

Authors:  Frederick A Zeiler; Marek Czosnyka; Peter Smielewski
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 2.216

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.