Literature DB >> 26626360

The response of guinea pig primary utricular and saccular irregular neurons to bone-conducted vibration (BCV) and air-conducted sound (ACS).

Ian S Curthoys1, Vedran Vulovic2, Ann M Burgess2, Ljiljana Sokolic2, Samanthi C Goonetilleke2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study sought to characterize the response of mammalian primary otolithic neurons to sound and vibration by measuring the resting discharge rates, thresholds for increases in firing rate and supra-threshold sensitivity functions of guinea pig single primary utricular and saccular afferents. Neurons with irregular resting discharge were activated in response to bone conducted vibration (BCV) and air conducted sound (ACS) for frequencies between 100 Hz and 3000 Hz. The location of neurons was verified by labelling with neurobiotin. Many afferents from both maculae have very low or zero resting discharge, with saccular afferents having on average, higher resting rates than utricular afferents. Most irregular utricular and saccular afferents can be evoked by both BCV and ACS. For BCV stimulation: utricular and saccular neurons show similar low thresholds for increased firing rate (around 0.02 g on average) for frequencies from 100 Hz to 750 Hz. There is a steep increase in rate change threshold for BCV frequencies above 750 Hz. The suprathreshold sensitivity functions for BCV were similar for both utricular and saccular neurons, with, at low frequencies, very steep increases in firing rate as intensity increased. For ACS stimulation: utricular and saccular neurons can be activated by high intensity stimuli for frequencies from 250 Hz to 3000 Hz with similar flattened U-shaped tuning curves with lowest thresholds for frequencies around 1000-2000 Hz. The average ACS thresholds for saccular afferents across these frequencies is about 15-20 dB lower than for utricular neurons. The suprathreshold sensitivity functions for ACS were similar for both utricular and saccular neurons. Both utricular and saccular afferents showed phase-locking to BCV and ACS, extending up to frequencies of at least around 1500 Hz for BCV and 3000 Hz for ACS. Phase-locking at low frequencies (e.g. 100 Hz) imposes a limit on the neural firing rate evoked by the stimulus since the neurons usually fire one spike per cycle of the stimulus.
CONCLUSION: These results are in accord with the hypothesis put forward by Young et al. (1977) that each individual cycle of the waveform, either BCV or ACS, is the effective stimulus to the receptor hair cells on either macula. We suggest that each cycle of the BCV or ACS stimulus causes fluid displacement which deflects the short, stiff, hair bundles of type I receptors at the striola and so triggers the phase-locked neural response of primary otolithic afferents. Crown
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone conduction; Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential; Otolith; VEMP; Vestibular

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26626360     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  31 in total

1.  Parameters of skull vibration-induced nystagmus in normal subjects.

Authors:  Enrique García Zamora; Pedro Espírito-Santo Araújo; Vanesa Pérez Guillén; María Fernanda Vargas Gamarra; Victoria Fornés Ferrer; Magdalena Courel Rauch; Herminio Pérez Garrigues
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Intense noise exposure alters peripheral vestibular structures and physiology.

Authors:  C E Stewart; D S Bauer; A C Kanicki; R A Altschuler; W M King
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  How does high-frequency sound or vibration activate vestibular receptors?

Authors:  I S Curthoys; J W Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Nanoscale Poroelasticity of the Tectorial Membrane Determines Hair Bundle Deflections.

Authors:  Jonathan B Sellon; Mojtaba Azadi; Ramin Oftadeh; Hadi Tavakoli Nia; Roozbeh Ghaffari; Alan J Grodzinsky; Dennis M Freeman
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Frequency and phase effects on cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) to air-conducted sound.

Authors:  Sendhil Govender; Danielle L Dennis; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Assessing residual vestibular function in adults with congenital hearing loss.

Authors:  Bing-Yi Lin; Yi-Ho Young
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Mapping the vestibular cerebellar evoked potential (VsCEP) following air- and bone-conducted vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Sendhil Govender; Neil P M Todd; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  The new vestibular stimuli: sound and vibration-anatomical, physiological and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Ian S Curthoys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  An operating principle of the turtle utricle to detect wide dynamic range.

Authors:  Jong-Hoon Nam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Perception of threshold-level whole-body motion during mechanical mastoid vibration.

Authors:  Rakshatha Kabbaligere; Charles S Layne; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.