Literature DB >> 2662320

Factors affecting running economy.

D W Morgan1, P E Martin, G S Krahenbuhl.   

Abstract

Running economy, defined as the steady-state VO2 for a given running velocity, has been shown to account for a large and significant proportion of variation in distance-running performance among runners roughly comparable in VO2 max. Despite this recognition, relatively little is known regarding the potpourri of physiological, environmental, structural and mechanical factors potentially associated with a lower aerobic demand of running. Early attempts at quantifying the energy expenditure of exhaustive runs incorporated measurements of oxygen consumption before, during, and after exercise. The validity of this approach has been questioned, however, since recent evidence has demonstrated that only a moderate relationship exists between postexercise VO2 and anaerobic metabolism. The energy demands for submaximal running (i.e. running economy) can be quantified by calculating the steady-state VO2, expressed with respect to body mass and time, for a standardised, submaximal running speed. Since this variable represents the aerobic demand of running, the generation of energy must derive wholly from cell respiration and not from substantial protein catabolism. Research has indicated that at low to moderate work rates, the steady-state energy condition is attained in about 3 minutes. Trained individuals reach steady-state sooner than unfit subjects. While limited by methodological constraints, the existence of a steady-state has also been verified by the lack of blood lactate accumulation and the presence of a respiratory exchange ratio of less than 1.00. The ability of economy, either singly or in combination with VO2 max, to account for a substantial portion of performance variation among trained distance runners and untrained subjects of comparable ability and fitness level has been demonstrated in recent cross-sectional studies. Limited data from short and long term longitudinal research also suggests that endurance running success is linked to training and growth-related improvements in economy. Intraindividual variation in economy has been shown to vary between 2% and 11% for a given speed. Most of this variation can probably be attributed to biological error. While the majority of evidence does not support a gender difference in running economy, data from some studies suggest that males may be more economical than women. Prepubescent children are less economical than older children and adults, whereas older adults exhibit the same trend when compared to younger counterparts. Because of air and wind resistance, the aerobic demands of indoor treadmill running significantly underestimate the cost of overground running, especially at higher speeds.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2662320     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-198907050-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  52 in total

Review 1.  Physiological demands of running during long distance runs and triathlons.

Authors:  C Hausswirth; D Lehénaff
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Use of a two-regression model for estimating energy expenditure in children.

Authors:  Scott E Crouter; Magdalene Horton; David R Bassett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 3.  Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners.

Authors:  Philo U Saunders; David B Pyne; Richard D Telford; John A Hawley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Effect of lower body compression garments on submaximal and maximal running performance in cold (10°C) and hot (32°C) environments.

Authors:  Shi Shien Goh; Paul B Laursen; Ben Dascombe; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Effect of anticipation during unknown or unexpected exercise duration on rating of perceived exertion, affect, and physiological function.

Authors:  D A Baden; T L McLean; R Tucker; T D Noakes; A St Clair Gibson
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Neuromuscular factors determining 5 km running performance and running economy in well-trained athletes.

Authors:  Ari T Nummela; Leena M Paavolainen; Karen A Sharwood; Mike I Lambert; Timothy D Noakes; Heikki K Rusko
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Training to enhance the physiological determinants of long-distance running performance: can valid recommendations be given to runners and coaches based on current scientific knowledge?

Authors:  Adrian W Midgley; Lars R McNaughton; Andrew M Jones
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Endurance exercise performance in Masters athletes: age-associated changes and underlying physiological mechanisms.

Authors:  Hirofumi Tanaka; Douglas R Seals
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Cycling performance and mechanical variables using a new prototype chainring.

Authors:  Lucien Belen; Mickaël Habrard; Jean Paul Micallef; Stéphane Perrey; Daniel Le Gallais
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Exercise-induced changes in triceps surae tendon stiffness and muscle strength affect running economy in humans.

Authors:  Kirsten Albracht; Adamantios Arampatzis
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.