| Literature DB >> 26623121 |
Anatol Prinzing1, Stefan Eichhorn1, Marcus-André Deutsch1, Ruediger Lange1, Markus Krane1.
Abstract
In the treatment of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) immediate resuscitation with chest compressions and ventilation is crucial for survival. As manual resuscitation is associated with several drawbacks, mechanical resuscitation devices have been developed to support resuscitation teams. These devices are able to achieve better perfusion of heart and brain in laboratory settings, but real world experience showed no significant improved survival in comparison to manual resuscitation. This review will focus on two mechanical resuscitation devices, the Lund University Cardiac Assist System (LUCAS) and AutoPulse devices and the actual literature available. In conclusion, the general use of mechanical resuscitation devices cannot be recommended at the moment.Entities:
Keywords: AutoPulse; Lund University Cardiac Assist System (LUCAS); Mechanical resuscitation
Year: 2015 PMID: 26623121 PMCID: PMC4635271 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.10.40
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Thorac Dis ISSN: 2072-1439 Impact factor: 2.895