Literature DB >> 26622242

A total EQD2 greater than 85 Gy for trachea and main bronchus D2cc being associated with severe late complications after definitive endobronchial brachytherapy.

Naoya Murakami1, Kazuma Kobayashi1, Satoshi Nakamura1, Akihisa Wakita1, Hiroyuki Okamoto1, Keisuke Tsuchida1, Tairo Kashihara1, Ken Harada1, Mayuka Yamada1, Shuhei Sekii1, Kana Takahashi1, Rei Umezawa1, Koji Inaba1, Yoshinori Ito1, Hiroshi Igaki1, Jun Itami1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The endobronchial brachytherapy (EBBT) is an established treatment method for tumors of the tracheobronchial system, however, little is known about the tolerance dose for organ at risk (OAR) in EBBT. The purpose of this study is to analyze patients with superficial bronchial carcinoma treated with definitive EBBT, and to investigate a relationship between late complications and dose for OAR.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Endobronchial brachytherapy was performed 6 Gy per fraction for three to four fractions with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). For the purpose of dosimetric analysis, the wall of the lower respiratory tract (LRT: trachea, main bronchus, and lobar bronchiole), trachea, and main bronchus (TMB) was extracted. D0.5cc, D1cc, and D2cc of LRT and TMB were calculated in each EBBT session and added together. V100, V150, and V200 of LRT were also calculated.
RESULTS: Between March 2008 and April 2014, EBBT was performed in 14 patients for curative intent. The 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local recurrence free survival (LRFS) was 82.1%, 77.9%, and 91.7%, respectively. There was one patient with grade 5, one grade 4, and three grade 3 obstruction of trachea or bronchus. The mean EQD2 of LRT D2cc, TMB D2cc, D1cc, and D0.5cc of patients with or without late severe respiratory complications was significantly different between two groups (p = 0.018, 0.008, 0.009, and 0.013, respectively). The 2-year incidence rates of late severe complications in patients with TMB D2cc ≤ 85 Gy in EQD2 and > 85 Gy were 0% and 83.3%, respectively with a statistically significance (p = 0.014).
CONCLUSIONS: It was discovered that TMB D2cc > 85 Gy in EQD2 is a strong risk factor for severe late respiratory complication after EBBT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DVH; bronchial cancer; endobronchial brachytherapy; main bronchus; severe late complications

Year:  2015        PMID: 26622242      PMCID: PMC4663210          DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2015.54968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy        ISSN: 2081-2841


Purpose

Endobronchial brachytherapy (EBBT) is an established treatment method for patients with tumors of the tracheobronchial system either as a palliative [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] or a definitive treatment [6, 7, 8, 9]. Fatal hemoptysis, ulcer, necrosis, or stenosis of the bronchi have been reported as late severe respiratory complications related with EBBT [10, 11, 12]. However, little is known about the tolerance of dose for organ at risk (OAR) in EBBT presumably because EBBT is mainly applied as palliative intent and it is difficult to distinguish between treatment-related toxicities or symptoms caused by tumor progression, and most patients die of present disease before late complications develop. Starting from 2008, CT-based image-guided EBBT has been performed as a definitive therapy for patients with superficial carcinoma of trachea, bronchus, or bronchiole without extrabronchial spread, regional lymph node metastasis, nor distant metastasis in our institution. Since then, we experienced several late severe respiratory complications related with EBBT. The purpose of this study was to analyze patients with superficial bronchial carcinoma treated with CT-based high-dose-rate EBBT and to investigate relationship between late severe respiratory complications and dose for OAR.

Material and methods

Since March 2008, patients with superficial carcinoma of trachea, bronchus, or bronchiole without extrabronchial spread, regional lymph node metastasis, nor distant metastasis were treated with CT-based three-dimensional image-guided EBBT as curative intent.

Radiation therapy

The principles of EBBT procedure is described in the referred report [10]. Twelve French plastic catheters with two 15 mm diameter wings was used for all the EBBT sessions. Catheter insertion was performed under local anesthesia and sedation under bronchofiberscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. At each EBBT session, CT image of 1-2 mm slice was taken by a CT simulator (Aquilion™ LB, Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) situated in a brachytherapy operating room. All EBBT was carried out by 192Ir remote after loading system (RALS, MicroSelectron HDR™, Nucletron, Veennendaal, The Netherlands). Dwell time in each dwell position was calculated with brachytherapy planning system (Oncentra® Nucletron, Veenendaal, The Netherlands), so that homogenous dose to reference points set on 1 cm laterally from the source was achieved, and 6 Gy per fraction was prescribed to these reference points. When the applicator formed concave shape, reference points were set on inner surface of the catheter curvature in order to avoid creating hot spots. If possible, two catheters were inserted to sandwich tumors, which seated on the spur of the bronchi, so as to achieve better dose coverage. At the discretion of the attending physician, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) was delivered by three-dimensional conformal technique with linear accelerator (Clinac iX, Varian Medical System, Palo Alto, CA, USA) using 6 or 10 MV photon beam. Treatment planning was based on CT images of 3 mm slice thickness taken by another large bore computed tomography (CT) simulator (Aquilion™ LB, Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan). The common EBRT fields included primary tumor with adequate margin. Regional lymph node area was not included in the fields. There was a tendency that very superficial tumors were treated solely with EBBT.

Statistical analysis

To investigate the relationship between dose to OAR and late severe respiratory complications, wall of the lower respiratory tract (LRT: trachea, main bronchus, and lobar bronchiole), trachea, and main bronchus (TMB) was extracted with 2 mm thickness wall structures, which is the thinnest thickness in Oncentra®. Most exposed, 0.5 cc, 1 cc, and 2 cc of LRT and TMB were calculated in each EBBT session and added together. Volume of LRT, which receives 100%, 150%, and 200% of prescribed dose were also calculated in each EBBT session and a mean value of Vxx% through all the sessions was derived. Because no fatal hemoptysis was observed in this retrospective study, no vascular structures were contoured as an OAR. For adding dose of EBRT and EBBT, the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) according to the Linear-Quadratic (LQ) model [13, 14] was calculated by following formula: The parameter N indicated the number of fractions and d the dose per fraction. For calculating normal tissue late complications, α/β value was assumed as 3 Gy. As dose calculation of EBBT was based on CT taken by each brachytherapy session, EQD2 at every EBBT session could be calculated and added together. For patients who had past history of thoracic irradiation, dose of the thoracic radiation was also added to EQD2 for OARs. Late complications regarding to respiratory tract, which were obviously related with EBBT that occurred later than three months after the end of EBBT, were assessed by the National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria ver. 4.0 (http//ctep.cancer.gov/forms/CTCAEv4.pdf), and late severe respiratory complications of grade 3 or higher (obstruction or stenosis of the air way) were counted. For the analysis of late severe respiratory complications, patients with local recurrence were excluded because it was difficult to distinguish the complication whether it was caused by EBBT or by tumor progression. Overall survival (OS) rate was estimated from the start of radiotherapy to the date of death or the last follow-up visit. Progression-free survival (PFS) rate was estimated from the start of radiotherapy to the date of any disease relapses were considered as an event. Patients without relapse who died of intercurrent disease or were alive were censored at the time of death or last follow-up. In calculating local relapse free survival rate (LRFS), only local relapse was counted as an event and regional lymph node or distant metastasis were not counted as an event. Overall survival, PFS, and LRFS were calculated by the Kaplan- Meier method. All of the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics (version 18.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Student's unpaired t test was used to compare the continuous variables and Person's χ2 test to compare categorical variables. A p value of < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. This retrospective study was approved by the institutional ethical review board of the National Cancer Center Hospital and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Results

Between March 2008 and April 2014, 14 patients were treated as curative intent by EBBT. Patients characteristics was summarized in Table 1. Most of the patients were male, elderly, and had a histology of squamous cell carcinoma. Median thickness of the tumor assessed by pretreatment thin slice CT was 5.0 mm (range 1-8.8). No patients had regional lymph node involvement nor distant metastasis before EBBT. Most patients were treated with EBBT because they were technically or medically inoperable.
Table 1

Patients and tumor characteristics (n = 14)

Clinical dataNumber, rate
Gender
 Male13
 Female1
Age (median, range)72 (58-87)
Histology
 SCC13
 Adenocarcinoma1
 Prior surgery10
 Prior EBRT1
 Prior PDT3
 Tumor depth (mm, range)5.0 (1-8.8)
Indication of EBBT
 Technically inoperable8
 Medically inoperable2
 Positive margin after surgery1
 Post PDT residure/relapse3

SCC – squamous cell carcinoma, EBRT – external beam radiation therapy,

PDT – photodynamic therapy, EBBT – endobronchial brachytherapy

Patients and tumor characteristics (n = 14) SCCsquamous cell carcinoma, EBRT – external beam radiation therapy, PDT – photodynamic therapy, EBBT – endobronchial brachytherapy Figure 1 shows distribution of the sites of the tumor in all the patients. The number shown in each small circle represents individual patient. Some patients had multiple diseases, so the total number of circles, which represent the location of the tumor exceeded the number of patients. Gray circles represent patients without grade 3 of greater late severe respiratory complications, black circles with complications mentioned above, and shaded circles with local recurrence.
Fig. 1

Distribution of tumor sites. The number shown in each circle represents individual patient. Because some patients had disease more than one part of the lower respiratory tract, the total number of the circles exceeded the number of patients analyzed in this study. Gray circle represents patients without grade 3 of greater late complication, black circle with late complication, and shaded circle with local recurrence

Distribution of tumor sites. The number shown in each circle represents individual patient. Because some patients had disease more than one part of the lower respiratory tract, the total number of the circles exceeded the number of patients analyzed in this study. Gray circle represents patients without grade 3 of greater late complication, black circle with late complication, and shaded circle with local recurrence Table 2 and Table 3 summarizes treatment detail and its associated grade of late respiratory complications for each patients. More than half of the patients received EBRT but some with very superficial lesion were treated by EBBT alone. Most patients received three or four fractions of EBBT except one patient who already had been treated by definitive EBRT of 60 Gy in 33 fractions and, therefore, treated by 2 Gy per fraction in total 46 Gy in 23 fractions of EBBT.
Table 2

Treatment details

Median LRT V 150 (cc) 1.5 (0.9-3.4)
Median LRT V 200 (cc) 0.7 (0.2-1.8)
Median TMB D 2cc (EQD 2 , Gy) 87.2 (6.6-156.3)
Median TMB D 1cc (EQD 2 , Gy) 116.0 (21.5-191.4)
Median TMB D 0.5cc (EQD 2 , Gy) 153.8 (40.1-250.3)

LRT – lower respiratory tract (trachea, main bronchus, and lobar bronchiole), Vxx – volume of tissue which receives xx% of prescribed dose, TMB – trachea and main bronchus, Dxxcc – most exposed xx cm3 of tissue, EQD2 – equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions

Table 3

Treatment details and associated grade of late respiratory complications for each patients

Patient's numberTumor locationPast history of thoracic RTCombination of EBRTEBBTReference pointGrade of late respiratory complications
# 1Main bronchusNone40 Gy/20 fr18 Gy/3 fr5 mm from the source1
# 2Bronchiole* None46 Gy/23 fr18 Gy/3 fr1 cm from the sourceN/A*
# 3Bronchiole** None018 Gy/3 fr1 cm from the source5**
# 4Main bronchus and bronchioleNone20 Gy/10 fr24 Gy/4 fr1 cm from the source0
# 5BronchioleNone40 Gy/20 fr24 Gy/4 fr1 cm from the source0
# 6TracheaNone40 Gy/20 fr18 Gy/3 fr1 cm from the source0
# 7Main bronchusNone40 Gy/20 fr24 Gy/4 fr7 mm from the source3
# 8Trachea and main bronchus*** 60 Gy/30 fr046 Gy/23 frSurface3
# 9Trachea and main bronchusNone50 Gy/25 fr18 Gy/3 fr1 cm from the source0
# 10TracheaNone40 Gy/20 fr24 Gy/4 frSurface4
# 11BronchioleNone024 Gy/4 fr7 mm from the source1
# 12BronchioleNone024 Gy/4 fr1 cm from the source0
# 13Main bronchusNone40 Gy/20 fr18 Gy/3 fr1 cm from the source3
# 14BronchioleNone024 Gy/4 fr1 cm from the source0

Patient # 2 had two bronchiole lesions and was not assessed for late complications because this patient developed local recurrence.

Patient # 3 had three bronchiole lesions. After having regional node metastasis, this patient received additional 60 Gy/30 fr of EBRT. Although tumor was controlled after additional EBRT, this patient died of respiratory failure.

Patients # 8 had bilateral main bronchus lesions.

RT – radiotherapy, EBRT – external beam radiation therapy, EBBT – endobronchial brachytherapy

Treatment details LRT – lower respiratory tract (trachea, main bronchus, and lobar bronchiole), Vxx – volume of tissue which receives xx% of prescribed dose, TMBtrachea and main bronchus, Dxxcc – most exposed xx cm3 of tissue, EQD2 – equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions Treatment details and associated grade of late respiratory complications for each patients Patient # 2 had two bronchiole lesions and was not assessed for late complications because this patient developed local recurrence. Patient # 3 had three bronchiole lesions. After having regional node metastasis, this patient received additional 60 Gy/30 fr of EBRT. Although tumor was controlled after additional EBRT, this patient died of respiratory failure. Patients # 8 had bilateral main bronchus lesions. RT – radiotherapy, EBRT – external beam radiation therapy, EBBT – endobronchial brachytherapy The median follow-up length of living patients was 24.8 months (10.1-77.9). There was one local recurrence and two regional lymph node recurrences observed. The patient with local recurrence received an additional 50 Gy in 25 fractions of EBRT but the disease could not be controlled and this patient eventually died of present disease. First patient with regional lymph node metastasis developed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and best supportive care was chosen, and finally died 9 months after lymph node metastasis. Another patient with regional lymph node metastasis received an additional 60 Gy in 30 fractions of EBRT. Although tumor was controlled after the additional EBRT, this patient died of respiratory failure and was counted as having grade 5 late radiation bronchial obstruction. The 2-year OS, PFS, and LRFS was 82.1%, 77.9%, and 91.7%, respectively (Figure 2).
Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of local recurrence free survival (LRFS), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of local recurrence free survival (LRFS), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) For the analysis of the dose tolerance of OAR, patient with local recurrence was excluded because it was difficult to distinguish the complications whether to be caused by EBBT or by tumor progression; therefore, 13 patients entered the analysis. There was one patient with grade 5, one grade 4, and three grade 3 obstruction of trachea or bronchus. Patient with grade 4 trachea obstruction developed severe aspiration pneumonia 22.6 months after EBBT. This patient received antibiotics and underwent tracheotomy, which made it easier to aspire infective sputum and eventually pneumonia resolved. Median time of development of late severe respiratory complications was 15.3 months (10.6-22.6). Comparison of dose-volume parameters of the LRT and TMB was summarized in Table 4 for the patients with or without late severe respiratory complications. The mean EQD2 of LRT D2cc, TMB D2cc, D1cc, and D0.5cc of patients with or without late severe respiratory complications was significantly different between two groups (p = 0.018, 0.008, 0.009, and 0.013, respectively). Patients with late severe respiratory complications showed a trend toward having larger LRT V100 and V150 (p = 0.06 and 0.051). The 2-year incidence rates of late severe respiratory complications in patients with TMB D2cc equal to or less than 85 Gy in EQD2, and over 85 Gy were 0% and 83.3%, respectively with a statistically significant difference (Figure 3, p = 0.014).
Table 4

Predictors of grade 3 or higher late complication after EBBT

With grade ≥ 3 late complication (n = 5)Without grade ≥ 3 late complication (n = 9) p value
Combined with EBRT350.685
LRT D2cc (EQD2, Gy)119.571.50.018*
LRT D1cc (EQD2, Gy)200.6145.90.201
LRT D0.5cc (EQD2, Gy)251.8209.80.43
LRT V100 (cc)4.630.06
LRT V150 (cc)2.31.40.051
LRT V200 (cc)1.10.70.183
TMB D2cc (EQD2, Gy)12454.10.008*
TMB D1cc (EQD2, Gy)158.479.10.009*
TMB D0.5cc (EQD2, Gy)198.8108.70.013*

EBRT – external beam radiation therapy, LRT – lower respiratory tract (trachea, main bronchus, and lobar bronchiole), TMB – trachea and main bronchus, EQD2 – equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions, Dxxcc – most exposed xx cm3 of tissue, Vxx – volume of tissue which receives xx% of prescribed dose

Fig. 3

Cumulative incidence of grade 3 or greater late respiratory complication stratified by trachea and main bronchus (TMB) D2cc 85 Gy in EQD2

Cumulative incidence of grade 3 or greater late respiratory complication stratified by trachea and main bronchus (TMB) D2cc 85 Gy in EQD2 Predictors of grade 3 or higher late complication after EBBT EBRT – external beam radiation therapy, LRT – lower respiratory tract (trachea, main bronchus, and lobar bronchiole), TMBtrachea and main bronchus, EQD2 – equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions, Dxxcc – most exposed xx cm3 of tissue, Vxx – volume of tissue which receives xx% of prescribed dose

Discussion

Fatal hemoptysis, ulcer, necrosis, or stenosis of the bronchi have been reported as late severe respiratory complications related with EBBT [10, 11, 12]. Direct contact of EBBT applicator to the tracheobronchial wall [10] or large V100 [12] was reported to be a risk factor of massive hemoptysis in EBBT. However, due to rarity of EBBT applied as a curative intent, there have been no report concerned the tolerance dose of OAR in EBBT and so far, the current report is the first report relating to DVH (dose-volume histogram) parameter of OAR and severe late respiratory complications in EBBT using modern three-dimensional image-guided brachytherapy. We experienced as many as five late severe respiratory complications out of 13 patients in this study. On the other hand, Kawamura et al. reported no patient with greater than grade 2 late complications treated either with the combination of EBRT and EBBT or with EBBT alone as a curative intent with 2-year local control rate of 86.2% [7]. They prescribed 5 Gy per fraction at mucosal surface with 4-5 fractions, which is shallower than our prescription point of 1 cm from the source. Although their local control rate was somewhat worse than our result of 91.7% but the complication rate was better. Therefore, modification of reference point setting or dose fractionation should be taken into consideration. Figure 1 shows, that most of the patients with severe late respiratory complications had their disease in trachea or main bronchus. Therefore, in addition to LRT, dose of TMB was also investigated and TMB D2cc greater than 85 Gy in EQD2 was found to be an adverse risk factor for severe late respiratory complications. This finding was in line with Hennequin et al. who reported that tumor location in trachea and/or main bronchus was associated with severe late respiratory complications after EBBT [15], suggesting that severe reactions were more problematic in central region than in distal area. In current study, control rate of EBBT for superficial bronchial carcinoma was excellent and if EBBT can be performed safely, EBBT could be an attractive alternative option for patients with superficial bronchial carcinoma because surgical resection often demands patients with severe loss of function. Knowing what was demonstrated, that TMB D2cc greater than 85 Gy in EQD2 is a strong risk factor for severe late respiratory complications after EBBT, we can modify the total dose so that TMB D2cc should not exceed 85 Gy. There were four limitations in this study: 1. This was a single institutional retrospective study with limited number of patients because of rarity of patients treated by EBBT. To elicit more reliable result, more patients should have needed. Therefore, this study was nothing short of preliminary study and further investigation is warranted. 2. In the calculation of OAR, most heavily irradiated part of each OAR in each EBBT session was simply cumulated; however, this might be an overestimation because applicators haven't been always set at the same position and the hotspots did not always be at the same portion of individual OAR. 3. There is an argument that LQ model does not fit well when dose per fraction is larger than 8-10 Gy and should not be applied in such big single fraction [16]. 4. Inhomogeneity correction was not considered in the current treatment planning system because airways are filled with air and real dose distributions could be different from what dose planning system showed us.

Conclusions

It was discovered that TMB D2cc greater than 85 Gy in EQD2 is a strong risk factor for severe late respiratory complication after EBBT. Three-dimensional image-guided treatment planning should be performed to reduce the rate of late severe respiratory complications after EBBT. Because current study is a preliminary one with limited number of patients, further investigation is required with more patients involved
  16 in total

1.  Treatment of roentgenographically occult endobronchial carcinoma with external beam radiotherapy and intraluminal low-dose-rate brachytherapy: second report.

Authors:  M Saito; A Yokoyama; Y Kurita; T Uematsu; H Tsukada; T Yamanoi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  The role of high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the palliation of symptoms in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yee C Ung; Edward Yu; Conrad Falkson; Adam E Haynes; Denise Stys-Norman; William K Evans
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Universal survival curve and single fraction equivalent dose: useful tools in understanding potency of ablative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Clint Park; Lech Papiez; Shichuan Zhang; Michael Story; Robert D Timmerman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Risk factors for massive hemoptysis after endobronchial brachytherapy in patients with tracheobronchial malignancies.

Authors:  R Hara; J Itami; T Aruga; T Kozuka; K Nakajima; H Yamashita; T Uno; T Morita; H Itoh; T Nomura
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Definitive high-dose-rate endobronchial brachytherapy of bronchial stump for lung cancer after surgery.

Authors:  Janusz Skowronek; Tomasz Piorunek; Marek Kanikowski; Adam Chicheł; Grzegorz Bielęda
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  High-dose-rate brachytherapy for non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a retrospective study of 226 patients.

Authors:  Maud Aumont-le Guilcher; Bernard Prevost; Marie Pierre Sunyach; Didier Peiffert; Philippe Maingon; Laurence Thomas; Danièle Williaume; Mickael Begue; Delphine Lerouge; Loïc Campion; Marc-André Mahe
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Irradiated volume and the risk of fatal hemoptysis in patients submitted to high dose-rate endobronchial brachytherapy.

Authors:  Heloisa de Andrade Carvalho; Silmara Luci Vernúcio Gonçalves; Wilson Pedreira; Marcelo Gervilla Gregório; Isac de Castro; Salim Aisen
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.705

8.  Optimization of dose and fractionation of endobronchial brachytherapy with or without external radiation in the palliative management of non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  I Mallick; S C Sharma; D Behera; S Ghoshal; A S Oinam
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.805

9.  Long-term results of curative intraluminal high dose rate brachytherapy for endobronchial carcinoma.

Authors:  Hidemasa Kawamura; Takeshi Ebara; Hiroyuki Katoh; Tomoaki Tamaki; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Hideyuki Sakurai; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Palliative thoracic radiotherapy in lung cancer: An American Society for Radiation Oncology evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  George Rodrigues; Gregory M M Videtic; Ranjan Sur; Andrea Bezjak; Jeffrey Bradley; Carol A Hahn; Corey Langer; Keith L Miller; Benjamin J Moeller; Kenneth Rosenzweig; Benjamin Movsas
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-04-08
View more
  4 in total

1.  Dosimetric impact of an air passage on intraluminal brachytherapy for bronchus cancer.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Okamoto; Akihisa Wakita; Satoshi Nakamura; Shie Nishioka; Ako Aikawa; Toru Kato; Yoshihisa Abe; Kazuma Kobayashi; Koji Inaba; Naoya Murakami; Jun Itami
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Hybrid optimization based on non-coplanar needles for brachytherapy dose planning.

Authors:  Xiaodong Ma; Zhiyong Yang; Shan Jiang; Guobin Zhang; Bin Huo; Shude Chai
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2019-06-28

3.  Analysis of dose distribution between contemporary and standard planning in high-dose-rate endobronchial brachytherapy based on three-dimensional imaging.

Authors:  Marcin Sawicki; Jarosław Łyczek; Zbigniew Szutkowski
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2019-10-30

4.  Endobronchial brachytherapy with curative intent: the impact of reference points setting according to the bronchial diameter.

Authors:  Yoshihito Nomoto; Noriko Ii; Shuichi Murashima; Yasufumi Yamashita; Satoru Ochiai; Akinori Takada; Yutaka Toyomasu; Tomoko Kawamura; Hajime Sakuma
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.724

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.