| Literature DB >> 26621798 |
Noor Hassan1, Barbara Geiger2, Rosaria Gandini1,3, Bharat K C Patel4, Roman Kittl2, Dietmar Haltrich2, Thu-Ha Nguyen2, Christina Divne1,3, Tien Chye Tan5,6.
Abstract
Lactose is produced in large amounts as a by-product from the dairy industry. This inexpensive disaccharide can be converted to more useful value-added products such as galacto-oligosaccharides (GOSs) by transgalactosylation reactions with retaining β-galactosidases (BGALs) being normally used for this purpose. Hydrolysis is always competing with the transglycosylation reaction, and hence, the yields of GOSs can be too low for industrial use. We have reported that a β-glucosidase from Halothermothrix orenii (HoBGLA) shows promising characteristics for lactose conversion and GOS synthesis. Here, we engineered HoBGLA to investigate the possibility to further improve lactose conversion and GOS production. Five variants that targeted the glycone (-1) and aglycone (+1) subsites (N222F, N294T, F417S, F417Y, and Y296F) were designed and expressed. All variants show significantly impaired catalytic activity with cellobiose and lactose as substrates. Particularly, F417S is hydrolytically crippled with cellobiose as substrate with a 1000-fold decrease in apparent k cat, but to a lesser extent affected when catalyzing hydrolysis of lactose (47-fold lower k cat). This large selective effect on cellobiose hydrolysis is manifested as a change in substrate selectivity from cellobiose to lactose. The least affected variant is F417Y, which retains the capacity to hydrolyze both cellobiose and lactose with the same relative substrate selectivity as the wild type, but with ~10-fold lower turnover numbers. Thin-layer chromatography results show that this effect is accompanied by synthesis of a particular GOS product in higher yields by Y296F and F417S compared with the other variants, whereas the variant F417Y produces a higher yield of total GOSs.Entities:
Keywords: Galacto-oligosaccharides; Halothermophile; Halothermothrix; Lactose conversion; Transglycosylation mutants; β-Galactosidase; β-Glucosidase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26621798 PMCID: PMC4803828 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-015-7118-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ISSN: 0175-7598 Impact factor: 4.813
Forward PCR mutagenesis primers
| N222F_fwd | 5′-CGGGTAAGCAGGGGTTAAGAAGAGAGTAATACCAATCTCC-3′ |
|---|---|
| N294T_fwd | 5′-CCATCCTGGAGTAGTAAGTAATGCCCAGGAAGTCAA-3′ |
| Y296F_fwd | 5′-ACCACCATCCTGGAGAAGTAATTAATGCCCAGGAA-3′ |
| N406I_fwd | 5′-GCCATAGGCCCATTCAAAAATATCCATCAATGACCACAC-3′ |
| F417Y_fwd | 5′-CCTATGGCTATAGCAAGCGCTATGGTCTCATTTATG-3′ |
| F417S_fwd | 5′-TAATCAACATAAATGAGACCACTGCGCTTGCTATAGCCATAGGC-3′ |
Fig. 1Structural details of mutation sites. a The active site of wild-type HoBGLA with relevant residues shown (PDB code 4PTX; Hassan et al. 2015). The amino acid replacements were modeled in the crystal structure: b N222F, c N294T, d Y296F, e N406I, f F417Y, and g F417S. Mutated residues are highlighted in green. A previously modeled 3GALA molecule (Hassan et al. 2015) was shown to delineate the subsites −1, +1, and +2 and has been superimposed on the theoretical structural models of the variants (Color figure online)
Kinetic parameters for β-glucosidase and β-galactosidase activities
|
|
| Selectivity, cellobiose over lactoseb | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( | |
| WTa | 366 | 25.4 | 14.4 | 231 | 154 | 1.54 | 9.4 |
| WT | 387 ± 15 | 10.0 ± 1.0 | 38.7 | 366 ± 17 | 26.3 ± 2.8 | 13.9 | 2.8 |
| N222F | 16.9 ± 1.3 | 93.2 ± 12.6 | 0.18 | 1.47 ± 0.05 | 41.3 ± 3.1 | 0.036 | 5.0 |
| N294T | 16.5 ± 0.4 | 9.0 ± 0.8 | 1.8 | 7.4 ± 0.2 | 30.8 ± 2.0 | 0.24 | 7.5 |
| Y296F | 8.5 ± 0.3 | 20.2 ± 1.6 | 0.42 | 6.9 ± 0.2 | 29.1 ± 2.3 | 0.24 | 1.8 |
| F417Y | 38.7 ± 0.6 | 3.5 ± 0.2 | 11.1 | 41.5 ± 1.2 | 10.3 ± 0.9 | 4.0 | 2.8 |
| F417S | 0.38 ± 0.01 | 11.9 ± 0.9 | 0.032 | 7.8 ± 0.4 | 23.2 ± 2.7 | 0.34 | 0.09 |
aReaction performed at 50 °C; from Hassan et al. 2015; all other reactions performed at 70 °C
bA ratio >1 favors cellobiose hydrolysis, whereas a ratio <1 favors lactose hydrolysis
Fig. 2Cellobiose and lactose hydrolysis and transglycosylation using cell lysates. TLC analysis of HoBGLA-catalyzed hydrolysis and transglycosylation in cell lysates of a cellobiose after 2 h, b lactose after 3 h, c lactose after 4.5 h; and d lactose after 4.5 h of reaction using cells carrying the expression vector without HoBGLA insert as control. Standards used: LGG, lactose (Lac); galactose (Gal); glucose (Glc); GOS, purified GOS with monosaccharides and lactose removed; Vivinal®GOS; Cel, cellobiose
Degree of lactose conversion, GOS yield, and individual GOS components
| Variants | WT | N222F | Y296F | F417S | N294T | F417Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Degree of lactose conversion (%) | 99.2 | 49.9 | 70.4 | 79.5 | 39.3 | 97.4 |
| GOS yield (% mass of total sugars) | 39.3 | 33.9 | 52.3 | 52.5 | 29.4 | 57.4 |
|
| ||||||
| D-Gal | 8.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.8 |
| D-Gal | 7.0 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.7 |
| D-Gal | 8.8 | 3.7 | 10.5 | 25.1 | 22.8 | 13.6 |
| D-Gal | 16.7 | 24.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.8 |
| D-Gal | 5.1 | 10.9 | 16.9 | 6.2 | 31.0 | 13.4 |
| D-Gal | 2.9 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| D-Gal | 45.4 | 57.9 | 66.3 | 66.5 | 42.6 | 53.1 |
Degree of lactose conversion, GOS yield, and individual GOS components produced by the transgalactosylation reaction of wild-type HoBGLA and the variants using lactose as substrate after 8 h of reaction. The reactions were performed at 70 °C with an initial lactose concentration of 300 g/L in sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) and 1 mM MgCl2 using 0.35 mg of purified enzyme
Time course of lactose conversion and formation of GOS by F417S
| Time (h) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Degree of lactose conversion (%) | 30.2 | 46.2 | 55.8 | 73.3 | 79.5 |
| GOS yield (% mass of total sugars) | 23.7 | 36.7 | 43.3 | 55.6 | 52.5 |
|
| |||||
|
| 18.8 | 23.1 | 24.7 | 25.5 | 25.1 |
|
| 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2.0 |
|
| 7.4 | 6.9 | 6.5 | 6.1 | 6.2 |
|
| 70.9 | 67.3 | 65.8 | 65.3 | 66.5 |
Time course of lactose conversion and formation of GOS during lactose conversion by the variant F417S. The reactions were performed at 70 °C at an initial lactose concentration of 300 g/L in sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) and 1 mM MgCl2 using 0.35 mg of purified enzyme
Fig. 3Separation and quantification by HPAEC-PAD. Separation and quantification by HPAEC-PAD of authentic standards (a, b) and of the GOS mixtures produced during lactose conversion catalyzed by wild-type HoBGLA (c) and HoBGLA F417S (d). The identified compounds are (1) galactose, (2) glucose, (3) D-Galp-(1 → 6)-D-Gal, (4) D-Galp-(1 → 6)-D-Glc (allolactose), (5) D-Galp-(1 → 4)-D-Glc (lactose), (6) D-Galp-(1 → 3)-D-Gal, (7) D-Galp-(1 → 6)-Lac, (8) D-Galp-(1 → 3)-D-Glc, (9) D-Galp-(1 → 4)-Lac, and (10) D-Galp-(1 → 3)-Lac. Products marked with an “x” were not identified. Different conditions were used for HPAEC-PAD analysis to separate D-glucose-, D-galactose, lactose, and allolactose (gradient 1, panel (a)) as well as the other oligosaccharides (gradient 2, panels (b–d)). Details are given in the “Materials and methods” section