Literature DB >> 26621730

Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination.

Romina Rader1, Ignasi Bartomeus2, Lucas A Garibaldi3, Michael P D Garratt4, Brad G Howlett5, Rachael Winfree6, Saul A Cunningham7, Margaret M Mayfield8, Anthony D Arthur9, Georg K S Andersson10, Riccardo Bommarco11, Claire Brittain12, Luísa G Carvalheiro13, Natacha P Chacoff14, Martin H Entling15, Benjamin Foully16, Breno M Freitas17, Barbara Gemmill-Herren18, Jaboury Ghazoul19, Sean R Griffin6, Caroline L Gross16, Lina Herbertsson10, Felix Herzog20, Juliana Hipólito21, Sue Jaggar16, Frank Jauker22, Alexandra-Maria Klein23, David Kleijn24, Smitha Krishnan19, Camila Q Lemos17, Sandra A M Lindström25, Yael Mandelik26, Victor M Monteiro17, Warrick Nelson5, Lovisa Nilsson10, David E Pattemore5, Natália de O Pereira17, Gideon Pisanty26, Simon G Potts4, Menno Reemer27, Maj Rundlöf28, Cory S Sheffield29, Jeroen Scheper30, Christof Schüepp31, Henrik G Smith32, Dara A Stanley33, Jane C Stout34, Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi35, Hisatomo Taki36, Carlos H Vergara37, Blandina F Viana21, Michal Woyciechowski38.   

Abstract

Wild and managed bees are well documented as effective pollinators of global crops of economic importance. However, the contributions by pollinators other than bees have been little explored despite their potential to contribute to crop production and stability in the face of environmental change. Non-bee pollinators include flies, beetles, moths, butterflies, wasps, ants, birds, and bats, among others. Here we focus on non-bee insects and synthesize 39 field studies from five continents that directly measured the crop pollination services provided by non-bees, honey bees, and other bees to compare the relative contributions of these taxa. Non-bees performed 25-50% of the total number of flower visits. Although non-bees were less effective pollinators than bees per flower visit, they made more visits; thus these two factors compensated for each other, resulting in pollination services rendered by non-bees that were similar to those provided by bees. In the subset of studies that measured fruit set, fruit set increased with non-bee insect visits independently of bee visitation rates, indicating that non-bee insects provide a unique benefit that is not provided by bees. We also show that non-bee insects are not as reliant as bees on the presence of remnant natural or seminatural habitat in the surrounding landscape. These results strongly suggest that non-bee insect pollinators play a significant role in global crop production and respond differently than bees to landscape structure, probably making their crop pollination services more robust to changes in land use. Non-bee insects provide a valuable service and provide potential insurance against bee population declines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bee; beetle; fly; insect pollinator; unmanaged pollinator

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26621730      PMCID: PMC4711867          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517092112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  40 in total

1.  Rain forest provides pollinating beetles for atemoya crops.

Authors:  Rosalind Blanche; Saul A Cunningham
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands.

Authors:  J C Biesmeijer; S P M Roberts; M Reemer; R Ohlemüller; M Edwards; T Peeters; A P Schaffers; S G Potts; R Kleukers; C D Thomas; J Settele; W E Kunin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success.

Authors:  Rudolf Meier; Kwong Shiyang; Gaurav Vaidya; Peter K L Ng
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Proximity to forest edge does not affect crop production despite pollen limitation.

Authors:  Natacha P Chacoff; Marcelo A Aizen; Valeria Aschero
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Frank Bretz; Peter Westfall
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification.

Authors:  Claire Kremen; Neal M Williams; Robbin W Thorp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Effect of pollen load size and source (self, outcross) on seed and fruit production in highbush blueberry cv. 'Bluecrop' (VACCINIUM CORYMBOSUM; Ericaceae).

Authors:  M H Dogterom; M L Winston; A Mukai
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.844

Review 8.  Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops.

Authors:  Alexandra-Maria Klein; Bernard E Vaissière; James H Cane; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Saul A Cunningham; Claire Kremen; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Displacement of a native by an alien bumblebee: lower pollinator efficiency overcome by overwhelmingly higher visitation frequency.

Authors:  Josefin A Madjidian; Carolina L Morales; Henrik G Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Hover flies are efficient pollinators of oilseed rape.

Authors:  Frank Jauker; Volkmar Wolters
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  88 in total

1.  Empidine dance flies pollinate the woodland geranium as effectively as bees.

Authors:  Vincent Lefebvre; Christophe Daugeron; Claire Villemant; Colin Fontaine
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  A window to the world of global insect declines: Moth biodiversity trends are complex and heterogeneous.

Authors:  David L Wagner; Richard Fox; Danielle M Salcido; Lee A Dyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Exotic species enhance response diversity to land-use change but modify functional composition.

Authors:  Jamie R Stavert; David E Pattemore; Anne C Gaskett; Jacqueline R Beggs; Ignasi Bartomeus
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination.

Authors:  Eva Knop; Leana Zoller; Remo Ryser; Christopher Gerpe; Maurin Hörler; Colin Fontaine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  A review of ecosystem service benefits from wild bees across social contexts.

Authors:  Denise Margaret S Matias; Julia Leventon; Anna-Lena Rau; Christian Borgemeister; Henrik von Wehrden
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 5.129

6.  One fly to rule them all-muscid flies are the key pollinators in the Arctic.

Authors:  Mikko Tiusanen; Paul D N Hebert; Niels Martin Schmidt; Tomas Roslin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Experimental evidence that honeybees depress wild insect densities in a flowering crop.

Authors:  Sandra A M Lindström; Lina Herbertsson; Maj Rundlöf; Riccardo Bommarco; Henrik G Smith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The worldwide importance of honey bees as pollinators in natural habitats.

Authors:  Keng-Lou James Hung; Jennifer M Kingston; Matthias Albrecht; David A Holway; Joshua R Kohn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Landscape configurational heterogeneity by small-scale agriculture, not crop diversity, maintains pollinators and plant reproduction in western Europe.

Authors:  Annika L Hass; Urs G Kormann; Teja Tscharntke; Yann Clough; Aliette Bosem Baillod; Clélia Sirami; Lenore Fahrig; Jean-Louis Martin; Jacques Baudry; Colette Bertrand; Jordi Bosch; Lluís Brotons; Françoise Burel; Romain Georges; David Giralt; María Á Marcos-García; Antonio Ricarte; Gavin Siriwardena; Péter Batáry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Crop production in the USA is frequently limited by a lack of pollinators.

Authors:  J R Reilly; D R Artz; D Biddinger; K Bobiwash; N K Boyle; C Brittain; J Brokaw; J W Campbell; J Daniels; E Elle; J D Ellis; S J Fleischer; J Gibbs; R L Gillespie; K B Gundersen; L Gut; G Hoffman; N Joshi; O Lundin; K Mason; C M McGrady; S S Peterson; T L Pitts-Singer; S Rao; N Rothwell; L Rowe; K L Ward; N M Williams; J K Wilson; R Isaacs; R Winfree
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.