Literature DB >> 26621712

Conservatives negatively evaluate counterstereotypical people to maintain a sense of certainty.

Chadly Stern1, Tessa V West2, Nicholas O Rule3.   

Abstract

People frequently use physical appearance stereotypes to categorize individuals when their group membership is not directly observable. Recent research indicates that political conservatives tend to use such stereotypes more than liberals do because they express a greater desire for certainty and order. In the present research, we found that conservatives were also more likely to negatively evaluate and distribute fewer economic resources to people who deviate from the stereotypes of their group. This occurred for people belonging to both preexisting and novel groups, regardless of whether the stereotypes were real or experimentally fabricated. Critically, conservatives only negatively evaluated counterstereotypical people when the stereotypes were functional-that is, when they expected that they would need to use the stereotypes at a later point to categorize individuals into groups. Moreover, increasing liberals' desire for certainty led them to negatively evaluate counterstereotypical people just like conservatives did. Thus, conservatives are not only more likely to use stereotypes than are liberals, but are especially likely to negatively evaluate counterstereotypical people to organize the social world with greater certainty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ideology; social evaluation; stereotyping

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26621712      PMCID: PMC4687596          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517662112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  13 in total

Review 1.  An ambivalent alliance. Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality.

Authors:  P Glick; S T Fiske
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2001-02

2.  A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.

Authors:  Susan T Fiske; Amy J C Cuddy; Peter Glick; Jun Xu
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-06

3.  Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freeman; Kerri L Johnson; Nalini Ambady; Nicholas O Rule
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-08-03

4.  Easier done than undone: asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences.

Authors:  Aiden P Gregg; Beate Seibt; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2006-01

5.  The politics of gaydar: ideological differences in the use of gendered cues in categorizing sexual orientation.

Authors:  Chadly Stern; Tessa V West; John T Jost; Nicholas O Rule
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2012-12-31

6.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?

Authors:  Michael Buhrmester; Tracy Kwang; Samuel D Gosling
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-03

7.  Reconstruing intolerance: abstract thinking reduces conservatives' prejudice against nonnormative groups.

Authors:  Jamie B Luguri; Jaime L Napier; John F Dovidio
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-05-31

8.  Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification.

Authors:  John T Jost; Aaron C Kay
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-03

9.  Inferences About Sexual Orientation: The Roles of Stereotypes, Faces, and The Gaydar Myth.

Authors:  William T L Cox; Patricia G Devine; Alyssa A Bischmann; Janet S Hyde
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2015-07-28

10.  Democrats and republicans can be differentiated from their faces.

Authors:  Nicholas O Rule; Nalini Ambady
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Electoral fortunes reverse, mindsets do not.

Authors:  Theodore Samore; Daniel M T Fessler; Colin Holbrook; Adam Maxwell Sparks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Confirmation of interpersonal expectations is intrinsically rewarding.

Authors:  Niv Reggev; Anoushka Chowdhary; Jason P Mitchell
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 3.436

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.