Literature DB >> 20682754

Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues.

Jonathan B Freeman1, Kerri L Johnson, Nalini Ambady, Nicholas O Rule.   

Abstract

Perceivers can accurately judge a face's sexual orientation, but the perceptual mechanisms mediating this remain obscure. The authors hypothesized that stereotypes casting gays and lesbians as gender "inverts," in cultural circulation for a century and a half, lead perceivers to use gendered facial cues to infer sexual orientation. Using computer-generated faces, Study 1 showed that as two facial dimensions (shape and texture) became more gender inverted, targets were more likely to be judged as gay or lesbian. Study 2 showed that real faces appearing more gender inverted were more likely to be judged as gay or lesbian. Furthermore, the stereotypic use of gendered cues influenced the accurate judgment of sexual orientation. Although using gendered cues increased the accuracy of sexual orientation judgments overall, Study 3 showed that judgments were reliably mistaken for targets that countered stereotypes. Together, the findings demonstrate that perceivers utilize gendered facial cues to glean another's sexual orientation, and this influences the accuracy or error of judgments.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20682754     DOI: 10.1177/0146167210378755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  16 in total

Review 1.  More Than Meets the Eye: Split-Second Social Perception.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freeman; Kerri L Johnson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Conservatives negatively evaluate counterstereotypical people to maintain a sense of certainty.

Authors:  Chadly Stern; Tessa V West; Nicholas O Rule
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A Developmental Model of the Sexual Minority Closet: Structural Sensitization, Psychological Adaptations, and Post-closet Growth.

Authors:  John E Pachankis; Skyler D Jackson
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-08-17

4.  Fertility Status Does Not Facilitate Women's Judgment of Male Sexual Orientation.

Authors:  Scott W Semenyna; Nicholas O Rule; Paul L Vasey
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-06-15

5.  Inferences About Sexual Orientation: The Roles of Stereotypes, Faces, and The Gaydar Myth.

Authors:  William T L Cox; Patricia G Devine; Alyssa A Bischmann; Janet S Hyde
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2015-07-28

6.  The eyes have it: sex and sexual orientation differences in pupil dilation patterns.

Authors:  Gerulf Rieger; Ritch C Savin-Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  At the crossroads of conspicuous and concealable: what race categories communicate about sexual orientation.

Authors:  Kerri L Johnson; Negin Ghavami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The roles of featural and configural face processing in snap judgments of sexual orientation.

Authors:  Joshua A Tabak; Vivian Zayas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Perceived sexual orientation based on vocal and facial stimuli is linked to self-rated sexual orientation in Czech men.

Authors:  Jaroslava Varella Valentova; Jan Havlíček
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex activity predicts the accuracy in estimating others' preferences.

Authors:  Pyungwon Kang; Jongbin Lee; Sunhae Sul; Hackjin Kim
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.