Literature DB >> 26620448

Clinical and radiological outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand-alone empty polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.

Ehab Shiban1, Karina Gapon2, Maria Wostrack3, Bernhard Meyer4, Jens Lehmberg5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term results after one-, two-, and three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with stand-alone empty polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a consecutive patient cohort that underwent ACDF with stand-alone empty PEEK cages between 2007 and 2010 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Radiographic follow-up included static and flexion/extension radiographs. Changes in the operated segments were measured and compared to radiographs directly after surgery. Clinical outcome was evaluated by a physical examination, pain visual analog scale (VAS), and health-related quality of life (HRQL) using the EuroQOL questionnaire (EQ-5D). Analysis of associations between fusion, subsidence, cervical alignment, and clinical outcome parameters were performed.
RESULTS: Of 407 consecutive cases, 318 met all inclusion criteria. Follow-up data were obtained from 265 (83 %) cases. The mean age at presentation was 55 years and 139 patients were male (52 %). In the sample, 127, 125, and 13 patients had one-, two-, and three-level surgeries, respectively; 132 (49 %) presented with spondylotic cervical myelopathy and 133 (50 %) with cervical radiculopathy. Fusion was achieved in 85, 95, and 94 % of segments in one-, two-, and three-level surgeries, respectively. Non-fusion was associated with higher VAS pain levels. Radiographic adjacent segment disease (ASD) was observed in 20, 29, and 15 % in one-, two-, and three-level surgeries, respectively. ASD was associated with lower HRQL. Subsidence was observed in 25, 27, and 15 % of segments in one-, two-, and three-level surgeries, respectively. However, this had no influence on clinical outcome. Follow-up operations for symptomatic adjacent disc disease and implant failure at index level were needed in 16 (6 %) and four (1.5 %) cases, respectively. Younger age was associated with better clinical outcome. Multilevel surgery favored better myelopathy outcomes and fusion reduced overall pain. ASD worsened EuroQOL-Index values. Worsening of the cervical alignment induced arm pain.
CONCLUSIONS: One- and two-level ACDF with stand-alone empty PEEK cages achieved very high fusion rates and a low rate of follow-up operations. The rate of good clinical outcome is highly satisfactory. Younger age was the single most influential factor associated with better clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Cervical myelopathy; Cervical radiculopathy; PEEK cages; Prognostic factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26620448     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-015-2630-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  19 in total

1.  A Prospective Study of the Functional Outcome of Anterior Cervical Discectomy With Fusion in Single Level Degenerative Cervical Disc Prolapse.

Authors:  Mayur M Kamani; Arjun Ballal; Vikram Shetty; H Ravindranath Rai; Deepak Hegde
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

2.  Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  I Noordhoek; M T Koning; C L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Implantation of an empty polyetheretherketone cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomised controlled study with 2 years follow-up.

Authors:  Shang-Wen Feng; Ming-Chau Chang; Po-Hsin Chou; Hsi-Hsien Lin; Shih-Tien Wang; Chien-Lin Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cage deviation in the subaxial cervical spine in relation to implant position in the sagittal plane.

Authors:  Klaus Christian Mende; Sven Oliver Eicker; Friedrich Weber
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Porous silicon nitride spacers versus PEEK cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical and radiological results of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Jasper F C Wolfs; Terry P Corbin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Sentinel sign in standalone anterior cervical fusion: Outcomes and fusion rate.

Authors:  Kingsley R Chin; Fabio J R Pencle; Luai M Mustafa; Moawiah M Mustafa; Amala Benny; Jason A Seale
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-08-24

Review 7.  Prevalence of adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingde Kong; Junming Cao; Linfeng Wang; Yong Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  A Prospective Study with Cage-Only or Cage-with-Plate Fixation in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion of One and Two Levels.

Authors:  Sam Yeol Kim; Seung Hwan Yoon; Dokeun Kim; Chang Hyun Oh; Seyang Oh
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2017-10-25

9.  Empty polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) show slow radiographic fusion that reduces clinical improvement: results from the prospective multicenter "PIERCE-PEEK" study.

Authors:  Olaf Suess; Martin Schomaker; Mario Cabraja; Marco Danne; Theodoros Kombos; Michael Hanna
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2017-04-28

10.  Long-Term Follow-Up Results of Anterior Cervical Inter-Body Fusion with Stand-Alone Cages.

Authors:  Woong-Beom Kim; Seung-Jae Hyun; Hoyong Choi; Ki-Jeong Kim; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.