Literature DB >> 26619247

Passive Sampling in Regulatory Chemical Monitoring of Nonpolar Organic Compounds in the Aquatic Environment.

Kees Booij1, Craig D Robinson2, Robert M Burgess3, Philipp Mayer4, Cindy A Roberts5, Lutz Ahrens6, Ian J Allan7, Jan Brant8, Lisa Jones9, Uta R Kraus10, Martin M Larsen11, Peter Lepom12, Jördis Petersen13, Daniel Pröfrock13, Patrick Roose14, Sabine Schäfer15, Foppe Smedes16,17, Céline Tixier18, Katrin Vorkamp19, Paul Whitehouse20.   

Abstract

We reviewed compliance monitoring requirements in the European Union, the United States, and the Oslo-Paris Convention for the protection of the marine environment of the North-East Atlantic, and evaluated if these are met by passive sampling methods for nonpolar compounds. The strengths and shortcomings of passive sampling are assessed for water, sediments, and biota. Passive water sampling is a suitable technique for measuring concentrations of freely dissolved compounds. This method yields results that are incompatible with the EU's quality standard definition in terms of total concentrations in water, but this definition has little scientific basis. Insufficient quality control is a present weakness of passive sampling in water. Laboratory performance studies and the development of standardized methods are needed to improve data quality and to encourage the use of passive sampling by commercial laboratories and monitoring agencies. Successful prediction of bioaccumulation based on passive sampling is well documented for organisms at the lower trophic levels, but requires more research for higher levels. Despite the existence of several knowledge gaps, passive sampling presently is the best available technology for chemical monitoring of nonpolar organic compounds. Key issues to be addressed by scientists and environmental managers are outlined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26619247     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  19 in total

1.  Emerging trends in photodegradation of petrochemical wastes: a review.

Authors:  Pardeep Singh; Ankita Ojha; Anwesha Borthakur; Rishikesh Singh; D Lahiry; Dhanesh Tiwary; Pradeep Kumar Mishra
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Using performance reference compounds to compare mass transfer calibration methodologies in passive samplers deployed in the water column.

Authors:  Abigail S Joyce; Robert M Burgess
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Ex situ determination of freely dissolved concentrations of hydrophobic organic chemicals in sediments and soils: basis for interpreting toxicity and assessing bioavailability, risks and remediation necessity.

Authors:  Michiel T O Jonker; Robert M Burgess; Upal Ghosh; Philip M Gschwend; Sarah E Hale; Rainer Lohmann; Michael J Lydy; Keith A Maruya; Danny Reible; Foppe Smedes
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework Directive: Recommendations for more efficient assessment and management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources.

Authors:  Werner Brack; Valeria Dulio; Marlene Ågerstrand; Ian Allan; Rolf Altenburger; Markus Brinkmann; Dirk Bunke; Robert M Burgess; Ian Cousins; Beate I Escher; Félix J Hernández; L Mark Hewitt; Klára Hilscherová; Juliane Hollender; Henner Hollert; Robert Kase; Bernd Klauer; Claudia Lindim; David López Herráez; Cécil Miège; John Munthe; Simon O'Toole; Leo Posthuma; Heinz Rüdel; Ralf B Schäfer; Manfred Sengl; Foppe Smedes; Dik van de Meent; Paul J van den Brink; Jos van Gils; Annemarie P van Wezel; A Dick Vethaak; Etienne Vermeirssen; Peter C von der Ohe; Branislav Vrana
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 5.  Evaluating Polymeric Sampling as a Tool for Predicting the Bioaccumulation of Polychlorinated Biphenyls by Fish and Shellfish.

Authors:  Stine N Schmidt; Robert M Burgess
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Equilibrium Porewater Measurement of PCBs and PAHs Using Direct Water Extraction and Comparison with Passive Sampling.

Authors:  Songjing Yan; Mandar Bokare; Upal Ghosh
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 11.357

7.  Cross Validation of Two Partitioning-Based Sampling Approaches in Mesocosms Containing PCB Contaminated Field Sediment, Biota, and Activated Carbon Amendment.

Authors:  Stine N Schmidt; Alice P Wang; Philip T Gidley; Allyson H Wooley; Guilherme R Lotufo; Robert M Burgess; Upal Ghosh; Loretta A Fernandez; Philipp Mayer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Passive sampling and benchmarking to rank HOC levels in the aquatic environment.

Authors:  Ian John Allan; Branislav Vrana; Jasperien de Weert; Alfhild Kringstad; Anders Ruus; Guttorm Christensen; Petr Terentjev; Norman Whitaker Green
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  In Situ Investigation of Performance Reference Compound-Based Estimates of PCB Equilibrated Passive Sampler Concentrations and Cfree in the Marine Water Column.

Authors:  Abigail S Joyce; Loretta A Fernandez; Robert M Burgess
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.218

10.  Year-Round Monitoring of Contaminants in Neal and Rogers Creeks, Hood River Basin, Oregon, 2011-12, and Assessment of Risks to Salmonids.

Authors:  Whitney B Hapke; Jennifer L Morace; Elena B Nilsen; David A Alvarez; Kevin Masterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.