| Literature DB >> 26619243 |
Ho-Chang Kuo1,2,3, Jen-Chieh Chang4, Mindy Ming-Huey Guo1,3, Kai-Sheng Hsieh1,3, Deniz Yeter3, Sung-Chou Li4, Kuender D Yang5,6.
Abstract
Kawasaki disease (KD) is a systemic vasculitis primarily affecting children < 5 years old. Genes significantly associated with KD mostly involve cardiovascular, immune, and inflammatory responses. Recent studies have observed stronger associations for KD risk with multiple genes compared to individual genes. Therefore, we investigated whether gene combinations influenced KD susceptibility or coronary artery lesion (CAL) formation. We examined 384 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for 159 immune-related candidate genes in DNA samples from KD patients with CAL (n = 73), KD patients without CAL (n = 153), and cohort controls (n = 575). Individual SNPs were first assessed by univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA). We used multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) to examine individual SNPs in one-, two-, and three-locus best fit models. UVA identified 53 individual SNPs that were significantly associated with KD risk or CAL formation (p < 0.10), while 35 individual SNPs were significantly associated using MVA (p ≤ 0.05). Significant associations in MDR analysis were only observed for the two-locus models after permutation testing (p ≤ 0.05). In logistic regression, combined possession of PDE2A (rs341058) and CYFIP2 (rs767007) significantly increased KD susceptibility (OR = 3.54; p = 4.14 x 10(-7)), while combinations of LOC100133214 (rs2517892) and IL2RA (rs3118470) significantly increased the risk of CAL in KD patients (OR = 5.35; p = 7.46 x 10(-5)). Our results suggest varying gene-gene associations respectively predispose individuals to KD risk or its complications of CAL.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26619243 PMCID: PMC4664466 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Multivariate analysis of 345 SNPs associated with KD susceptibility in patients and cohort controls (p ≤ 0.05).
| Gene | dbSNP | Best fitting genetic model |
| OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| rs2853744 | Recessive (TT vs. TG/GG) | 0.028 | 0.04 (0.00–0.72) |
|
| rs10845821 | Recessive (TT vs. TC/CC) | 0.011 | 0.45 (0.25–0.83) |
|
| rs2728127 | Additive (number of G alleles) | 0.011 | 0.89 (0.82–0.97) |
|
| rs10210631 | Dominant (AA/AG vs. GG) | 0.030 | 1.51 (1.04–2.19) |
|
| rs17611 | Recessive (AA vs. AG/GG) | 0.012 | 1.67 (1.12–2.49) |
|
| rs2287886 | Dominant (AA/AG vs. GG) | 0.002 | 3.50 (1.58–7.76) |
|
| ||||
|
| rs2040410 | Recessive (AA vs. AG/GG) | 0.035 | 0.12 (0.02–0.86) |
|
| rs2240017 | Co-dominant (CG vs. CC/GG) | 6.92*10−5 | 0.37 (0.23–0.61) |
|
| rs2071541 | Recessive (TT vs. TC/CC) | 0.011 | 0.59 (0.40–0.89) |
|
| rs2042772 | Recessive (TT vs. TC/CC) | 0.031 | 0.66 (0.46–0.96) |
|
| rs1800925 | Additive (number of C alleles) | 0.003 | 0.94 (0.91–0.98) |
|
| rs3097671 | Additive (number of G alleles) | 2.10*10−4 | 1.10 (1.05–1.16) |
|
| rs340833 | Co-dominant (AG vs. AA/GG) | 0.014 | 1.61 (1.10–2.34) |
|
| ||||
|
| rs3918400 | Recessive (TT vs. TC/CC) | 0.018 | 0.24 (0.07–0.78) |
|
| rs836145 | Recessive (TT vs. TG/GG) | 0.009 | 0.54 (0.34–0.86) |
|
| rs11121484 | Co-dominant (TC vs. TT/CC) | 0.043 | 0.57 (0.33–0.98) |
|
| rs341058 | Recessive (AA vs. AG/GG) | 0.040 | 0.68 (0.47–0.98) |
|
| rs767007 | Additive (number of G alleles) | 0.042 | 0.96 (0.92–1.00) |
|
| rs2274514 | Additive (number of G alleles) | 0.005 | 0.98 (0.97–0.99) |
|
| rs6128 | Additive (number of G alleles) | 0.016 | 1.02 (1.00–1.04) |
|
| rs1042713 | Co-dominant (AG vs. AA/GG) | 0.014 | 1.59 (1.10–2.29) |
|
| rs262918 | Dominant (TT/TC vs. CC) | 0.021 | 2.07 (1.11–3.83) |
|
| rs4358459 | Dominant (TT/TG vs. GG) | 0.027 | 4.24 (1.18–15.31) |
Multivariate analysis of 345 SNPs associated with CAL formation in KD patients (p ≤ 0.05).
| Gene | dbSNP | Best fitting genetic model |
| OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| rs12611071 | Recessive (AA vs. AC/CC) | 0.007 | 0.20 (0.06–0.64) |
|
| rs2111235 | Additive (number of C alleles) | 0.006 | 1.28 (1.07–1.53) |
|
| rs1863873 | Co-dominant (TC vs. TT/CC) | 0.032 | 2.36 (1.08–5.16) |
|
| rs867562 | Co-dominant (AG vs. AA/GG) | 0.002 | 3.41 (1.55–7.49) |
|
| rs2302004 | Co-dominant (TC vs. TT/CC) | 0.001 | 3.64 (1.64–8.07) |
|
| rs2569190 | Dominant (AA/AG vs. GG) | 0.005 | 5.72 (1.67–19.60) |
|
| ||||
|
| rs2243250 | Dominant (TT/TC vs. CC) | 0.006 | 0.03 (0.00–0.38) |
|
| rs1485332 | Additive (number of G alleles) | 0.001 | 1.22 (1.09–1.38) |
|
| rs2583476 | Co-dominant (TC vs. TT/CC) | 0.001 | 3.81 (1.69–8.57) |
|
| ||||
|
| rs730012 | Co-dominant (AC vs. AA/CC) | 0.027 | 0.29 (0.10–0.87) |
|
| rs3918400 | Additive (number of C alleles) | 0.015 | 0.91 (0.84–0.98) |
|
| rs286902 | Recessive (AA vs. AG/GG) | 0.003 | 3.31 (1.51–7.26) |
Best fit results using multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis of one-, two-, and three-locus models for KD susceptibility in patients and cohort controls.
| Gene (polymorphism) |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| TBX21 (rs2240017) | 50.32% | 12/20 | 0.868 |
| PDE2A (rs341058) and CYFIP2 (rs767007) | 53.73% | 17/20 | 0.021 |
| STAT3 (rs1026916), CLEC7A (rs2078178), and PSMB8 (rs3763364) | 43.24% | 6/20 | 0.999 |
a Average testing balanced accuracy is the accuracy of classifications for cases and controls in the testing dataset (one-twentieth of the data) calculated as (Sensitivity+Specificity)/2.
b Average cross validation consistency is the number of times the model was selected as the best model after 20 cross-validation runs.
c Significance of accuracy (empirical p-value based on 10,000 permutations).
** p-value ≤ 0.05
Best fit results using multifactor dimensionality reduction analysis of one-, two-, and three-locus models for CAL formation in KD patients.
| Gene (polymorphism) |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| LY75 (rs2042772) | 45.59% | 12/20 | 0.588 |
| LOC100133214 (rs2517892) and IL2RA (rs3118470) | 53.60% | 13/20 | 0.021 |
| FGF1 (rs249923), CLEC2D (rs1863873), and CCL2 (rs2857656) | 43.42% | 5/20 | 0.942 |
a Average testing balanced accuracy is the accuracy of classifications for cases and controls in the testing dataset (one-twentieth of the data) calculated as (Sensitivity+Specificity)/2.
b Average cross validation consistency is the number of times the model was selected as the best model after 20 cross-validation runs.
c Significance of accuracy (empirical p-value based on 10,000 permutations).
** p-value ≤ 0.05
Fig 1PDE2A (rs341058) and CYFIP2 (rs767007) gene-gene interaction in a two-way mode of MDR analysis.
The interaction of PDE2A and CYFIP2 was significantly associated with increased KD risk in logistic regression of our MDR results from KD patients (n = 226) and cohort controls (n = 575), with an odds ratio of 3.54 (95% CI: 2.17–5.78) and a p-value of 4.14 x 10−7. (A) MDR classified the nine interactive items of allele combinations into high- or low-risk KD groups, which were significantly different in our further analysis using the Chi-square test (p = 9.71 x 10–7). (B).
Fig 2LOC100133214 (rs2517892) and IL2RA (rs3118470) gene-gene interaction in a 2-way mode of MDR analysis.
The interaction of LOC100133214 and IL2RA was significantly associated with a higher risk of CAL formation using logistic regression of our MDR results from KD patients with CAL (n = 73) and KD patients without CAL (n = 153), with an odds ratio of 5.35 (95% CI: 2.33–12.25) and a p-value of 7.46 x 10−5. (A) MDR classified the nine interactive items into high- or low-risk CAL groups, which were significantly different in our further analysis using the Chi-square test (p = 3.36 x 10−6). (B).
Fig 3Comparison cytokines levels between KD patients with high-risk genotypes and low-risk genotypes.
KD patients possessing the high-risk (KD risk: 1) PDE2A (rs341058) and CYFIP2 (rs767007) genotypes of KD susceptibility (n = 49) presented with significantly lower plasma levels of TGF-β1 (9489 ± 1605 vs. 16133 ± 3015) compared to KD patients in the low-risk group (KD risk: 0, n = 24), with an odds ratio of 0.59 (p = 0.036). (A) KD patients possessing the high-risk LOC100133214 (rs2517892) and IL2RA (rs3118470) genotypes of CAL formation (CAL risk: 1, n = 35) presented with significantly elevated plasma levels of IL-2 (14.1 ± 1.6 vs. 9.6 ± 1.2) compared to KD patients in the low-risk group (CAL risk: 0, n = 38), with an odds ratio of 1.47 (p = 0.028). (B) KD patients possessing the high-risk LOC100133214 (rs2517892) and IL2RA (rs3118470) genotypes of CAL formation (CAL risk: 1, n = 35) presented with significantly elevated plasma levels of IL-6 (51.0 ± 14.3 vs. 18.4 ± 3.7) compared to KD patients in the low-risk group (CAL risk: 0, n = 38), with an odds ratio of 2.77 (p = 0.033). (C) KD patients possessing the high-risk LOC100133214 (rs2517892) and IL2RA (rs3118470) genotypes of CAL formation (CAL risk: 1, n = 35) presented with significantly elevated plasma levels of IFN-γ (119.2 ± 15.2 vs. 81.8 ± 10.1) compared to KD patients in the low-risk group (CAL risk: 0, n = 38), with an odds ratio of 1.46 (p = 0.041). (D).