Literature DB >> 26618752

Sustainability Council of New Zealand Trust v. The Environmental Protection Authority: Gene editing technologies and the law.

Drew L Kershen1.   

Abstract

In May 2014, a New Zealand court rendered the first judicial opinion in the world about the legal classification of gene-editing techniques. The court ruled that ZFN-1 and TALEs are techniques of genetic modification and thus within the New Zealand statute and regulations governing genetically modified organisms. This article explains the facts of this legal matter, the reasoning of the court, and provides commentary about the implications of this decision for New Zealand and other jurisdictions around the world.

Keywords:  New Zealand; gene-editing techniques; genetically-modified organisms; legal classification

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26618752      PMCID: PMC5033166          DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2015.1122859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  GM Crops Food        ISSN: 2164-5698            Impact factor:   3.074


  2 in total

1.  Sustainability Council of New Zealand Trust v. The Environmental Protection Authority: Gene editing technologies and the law.

Authors:  Drew L Kershen
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.074

Review 2.  The Regulatory Status of Genome-edited Crops.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt; Kan Wang; Bing Yang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 9.803

  2 in total
  9 in total

1.  Sustainability Council of New Zealand Trust v. The Environmental Protection Authority: Gene editing technologies and the law.

Authors:  Drew L Kershen
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.074

2.  A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome-edited crops.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ishii; Motoko Araki
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.074

3.  Enabling Genome Editing for Enhanced Agricultural Sustainability.

Authors:  Felicity Keiper; Ana Atanassova
Journal:  Front Genome Ed       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ishii; Motoko Araki
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 4.570

5.  Impacts of the regulatory environment for gene editing on delivering beneficial products.

Authors:  Daniel Jenkins; Raymond Dobert; Ana Atanassova; Chloe Pavely
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 2.252

Review 6.  Towards social acceptability of genome-edited plants in industrialised countries? Emerging evidence from Europe, United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan.

Authors:  Armin Spök; Thorben Sprink; Andrew C Allan; Tomiko Yamaguchi; Christian Dayé
Journal:  Front Genome Ed       Date:  2022-08-31

Review 7.  A New Zealand Perspective on the Application and Regulation of Gene Editing.

Authors:  Steffi Fritsche; Charleson Poovaiah; Elspeth MacRae; Glenn Thorlby
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Plants Developed by New Genetic Modification Techniques-Comparison of Existing Regulatory Frameworks in the EU and Non-EU Countries.

Authors:  Michael F Eckerstorfer; Margret Engelhard; Andreas Heissenberger; Samson Simon; Hanka Teichmann
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-02-19

Review 9.  Regulatory approaches for genome edited agricultural plants in select countries and jurisdictions around the world.

Authors:  Jon Entine; Maria Sueli S Felipe; Jan-Hendrik Groenewald; Drew L Kershen; Martin Lema; Alan McHughen; Alexandre Lima Nepomuceno; Ryo Ohsawa; Reynante L Ordonio; Wayne A Parrott; Hector Quemada; Carl Ramage; Inez Slamet-Loedin; Stuart J Smyth; Diane Wray-Cahen
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.788

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.