Literature DB >> 26618504

Assessment of inhalation exposure to indoor air pollutants: Screening for health risks of multiple pollutants in Japanese dwellings.

Kenichi Azuma1, Iwao Uchiyama2, Shigehisa Uchiyama3, Naoki Kunugita4.   

Abstract

Over the past few decades, multiple low level indoor pollutants have been found in domestic dwellings. The types and concentrations of these indoor pollutants have not been consistent over time and have changed with alterations in lifestyle, the development of novel products used in housing, and the development of new measurement technologies. To clarify the highest risk pollutants for which health risks should be reduced, we conducted a health risk assessment of 49 indoor air pollutants measured in 602 houses during winter and summer from 2012 to 2014. Inhalation reference concentrations were determined, and the margins of exposure were estimated for each indoor pollutant from measured indoor air concentrations. Health risks due to ammonia and acidic gases, including formic acid, acetic acid, and hydrogen chloride, were also assessed. Overall, during both winter and summer, the highest risk pollutants were acrolein, nitrogen dioxide, benzene, formic acid, and hydrogen chloride. The health risks of propanal, acetaldehyde, and 1,4-dichlorobenzene were also high. Principal component analysis (PCA) suggested an independent principal component for 1,4-dichlorobenzene. The primary source of exposure to 1,4-dichlorobenzene in Japan is an indoor household insect repellent. The improvement of individual lifestyle and housing may be appropriate targets for reducing the risk associated with this compound. The provision of further information on the risk to consumers and promotion of changes in consumer consciousness are needed. PCA suggested that the health risks of indoor air pollutants are amalgamated into similar chemical families, such as aldehydes, aliphatic hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, or acetic esters. Our results suggest that health-based guidelines or source control measures, based on these chemical families and similar health endpoints, are appropriate for reducing total health risk due to multiple low level indoor pollutants.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Airborne chemicals; Indoor air quality; Nationwide survey; Risk assessment; Screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26618504     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  4 in total

Review 1.  Indoor air quality in public utility environments-a review.

Authors:  Monika Śmiełowska; Mariusz Marć; Bożena Zabiegała
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The energy and time saving coordinated control methods of CO2, VOCs, and PM2.5 in office buildings.

Authors:  Xiaochun Wu; Yan Zhang; Fang Hou; Huichao Wang; Jianjie Zhou; Wei Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Indoor Air Quality Analysis of Newly Built Houses.

Authors:  Norimichi Suzuki; Hiroko Nakaoka; Masamichi Hanazato; Yoshitake Nakayama; Kayo Tsumura; Kazunari Takaya; Emiko Todaka; Chisato Mori
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Concentrations of Formic Acid, Acetic Acid, and Ammonia in Newly Constructed Houses.

Authors:  Norimichi Suzuki; Hiroko Nakaoka; Akifumi Eguchi; Masamichi Hanazato; Yoshitake Nakayama; Kayo Tsumura; Kohki Takaguchi; Kazunari Takaya; Emiko Todaka; Chisato Mori
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.