Heme-copper oxidases (HCOs) are key enzymes in prokaryotes and eukaryotes for energy production during aerobic respiration. They catalyze the reduction of the terminal electron acceptor, oxygen, and utilize the Gibbs free energy to transport protons across a membrane to generate a proton (ΔpH) and electrochemical gradient termed proton motive force (PMF), which provides the driving force for the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis. Excessive PMF is known to limit the turnover of HCOs, but the molecular mechanism of this regulatory feedback remains relatively unexplored. Here we present a single-enzyme study that reveals that cytochrome bo3 from Escherichia coli, an HCO closely homologous to Complex IV in human mitochondria, can enter a rare, long-lifetime leak state during which proton flow is reversed. The probability of entering the leak state is increased at higher ΔpH. By rapidly dissipating the PMF, we propose that this leak state may enable cytochrome bo3, and possibly other HCOs, to maintain a suitable ΔpH under extreme redox conditions.
Heme-copper oxidases (HCOs) are key enzymes in prokaryotes and eukaryotes for energy production during aerobic respiration. They catalyze the reduction of the terminal electron acceptor, oxygen, and utilize the Gibbs free energy to transport protons across a membrane to generate a proton (ΔpH) and electrochemical gradient termed proton motive force (PMF), which provides the driving force for the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis. Excessive PMF is known to limit the turnover of HCOs, but the molecular mechanism of this regulatory feedback remains relatively unexplored. Here we present a single-enzyme study that reveals that cytochrome bo3 from Escherichia coli, an HCO closely homologous to Complex IV in human mitochondria, can enter a rare, long-lifetime leak state during which proton flow is reversed. The probability of entering the leak state is increased at higher ΔpH. By rapidly dissipating the PMF, we propose that this leak state may enable cytochrome bo3, and possibly other HCOs, to maintain a suitable ΔpH under extreme redox conditions.
One of the main roles
of oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria
and bacteria is maintaining a proton-motive force (PMF) across the
inner or plasma membrane, thereby providing most of the energy for
the synthesis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in aerobic environments.
The PMF is formed by transferring or pumping protons across the lipid
membrane, generating a transmembrane electrochemical potential and
transmembrane pH difference (ΔpH). During aerobic respiration,
electron-transport chains of oxidative phosphorylation terminate with
heme-copper oxygen reductases (HCOs), in which a heme-copper binuclear
center (BNC) binds and reduces dioxygen to water. The HCO in mitochondria
is a cytochrome c oxidase known as Complex IV. Complex
IV and a bacterial homologue, cytochrome bo3 from Escherichia coli, belong to the A1 subgroup
of Type-A HCOs, which typically pump one proton per electron, therefore
four protons per dioxygen molecule.[1] The
reduction of dioxygen is further coupled to the uptake/release of
four charges (protons and/or electrons), adding up to a total of eight
charges transported across the membrane for each dioxygen that is
reduced. Type-A HCOs possess two conserved proton channels, known
as the K- and D-channel, both leading to the BNC.[2−5] The K-channel facilitates the
transportation of “chemical protons” that react with
dioxygen to form water; the D-channel facilitates both the uptake
of “chemical protons” and the transportation of all
the pumped protons.[6−9] Both channels take up protons from the same side of the membrane:
the matrix side in mitochondria or the cytoplasmic side in bacteria.[2,3]Despite various high-resolution structures[2−4] and extensive
biochemical and biophysical research,[6−15] a distinct understanding of the molecular mechanism by which oxygen
reduction is coupled to proton pumping is still elusive, while the
manner by which turnover is controlled by the PMF remains relatively
unexplored. HCOs, including cytochrome bo3, have been observed to reduce activity in the presence of high PMF.[16,17] A “slip” in their pumping stoichiometry (decrease
in the proton-to-electron ratio) has been observed in many HCO studies[16] and also for other transport systems.[18] The implications of these alterations in stoichiometry
have been previously discussed for HCOs and for pumping ATPases and
transporters in healthy and disease states.[5,18−21] Slips in substrate transport have been proposed to act as a “safety
valve” through which excess driving force can be dissipated[18] and it is proposed to be a mechanism by which
HCOs can optimize the condition for ATP synthesis.[16] Maintaining such balance is important since high PMF and
a highly reduced electron-transport chain (high ratios in ubiquinol/ubiquinone
and NADH/NAD+) have been linked to increased production
of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in mitochondria,[16,22] which has been implicated in aging, cancer, and other diseases.[23,24]Schematic
diagram of the experimental method. Proton uptake/release
activity of reconstituted cytochrome bo3 is controlled by reducing ubiquinone electrochemically (a). The
change in intravesicular pH is determined via an encapsulated pH-sensitive
fluorescent dye, 8-Hydroxypyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (HPTS) (a).
A color-inverted fluorescent image (b) and the fitting of the fluorescence
of the circled proteoliposome by a Gaussian function (c) (the grid
is raw data, and the colored surface is the fitting result) are shown.
The sample image in (b) shows a small area of the whole image which
typically contains hundreds of (proteo)liposomes.Current understanding of the pumping mechanism of HCOs primarily
relies on ensemble studies averaging the behavior of multiple pumps.[25−28] While providing a great wealth of information, these studies average
out rare events during continuous turnover, masking the dynamic heterogeneity
of HCOs and effectively preventing detection of leak states. Single-molecule
studies on the other hand offer the exquisite ability to directly
observe the temporal fluctuations of individual enzymes and their
role in regulation of their activities.[29,30] Single-enzyme
studies were pioneered for ion channel current recordings and, more
recently, single-enzyme studies on transporters have visualized the
structural dynamics of transmembrane helices.[31] However, neither method can directly report on proton pumping during
continuous turnover. Here, we have developed a novel platform that
can directly observe the proton transfer of single cytochrome bo3 enzymes for prolonged periods (up to 100
s; Figure a). Our
studies reveal that cytochrome bo3, a
representative HCO enters a rare, long-lifetime “leak state”
during which protons rapidly leak or are transported back along the
transmembrane electrochemical potential and ΔpH. Our findings
support a view in which one of the underlying causes of the previously
observed reductions in the H+/e– stoichiometry
is a leak state, which provides new insights into the molecular mechanism
of proton pumping in HCOs and its regulation by excessive ΔpH.
The novel method described in this study also adds to the ever expanding
library of techniques to study single molecules on surfaces by combining
optical and electrochemical methods.[32]
Figure 1
Schematic
diagram of the experimental method. Proton uptake/release
activity of reconstituted cytochrome bo3 is controlled by reducing ubiquinone electrochemically (a). The
change in intravesicular pH is determined via an encapsulated pH-sensitive
fluorescent dye, 8-Hydroxypyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (HPTS) (a).
A color-inverted fluorescent image (b) and the fitting of the fluorescence
of the circled proteoliposome by a Gaussian function (c) (the grid
is raw data, and the colored surface is the fitting result) are shown.
The sample image in (b) shows a small area of the whole image which
typically contains hundreds of (proteo)liposomes.
Results
and Discussion
This study was carried out on cytochrome bo3, an ubiquinol oxidase from E. coli. A key
difference between bo3 and cytochrome c oxidases such as Complex IV is their electron donor, which
are ubiquinol and cytochrome c, respectively. This
allowed us to design a combined electrochemical-microscopic experimental
setup for single-enzyme analysis as schematically shown in Figure . In this setup,
which is described in detail in the Materials and
Methods, proteoliposomes containing cytochrome bo3 are sparsely adsorbed on a transparent ultrasmooth thin
gold electrode within an electrochemical cell. The gold is modified
with a self-assembled monolayer of 6-mercapto-hexanol, which renders
it hydrophilic and allows immobilization of the proteoliposomes, that
retain the pH sensitive fluorophore. To approach single-enzyme conditions,
the proteoliposomes are made using a very low protein-to-lipid ratio.
Because of the low protein-to-lipid ratio, most of the liposomes in
the experiments do not contain a protein and we will adopt the term
“(proteo)liposomes” in the remainder of this text to
reflect this. Image analyses procedures are used to exclude (proteo)liposomes
that are close together by picking circular and separated bright spots
with a typical size that is consistent with single vesicles (see Materials and Methods). Nonetheless, this analysis
will not be able to detect if two (proteo)liposomes are less than
200 nm apart. As described in the Supporting Information, simulations based on assumption that vesicles randomly adsorb on
the surface suggest that this will occur in only 0.3 ± 0.2% of
fluorescent spots. Because most (proteo)liposomes do not contain an
enzyme, the probability that two proteoliposomes with an enzyme coincide
in a single fluorescent spot is much lower.The (proteo)liposomes
also contain ubiquinone that is electrochemically
reduced to ubiquinol, thereby activating the oxygen reducing activity
of cytochrome bo3. The (proteo)liposomes
are loaded with a pH-sensitive fluorescent dye (hydroxypyrene-1, 3,
6-trisulfonic acid trisodium salt (HPTS)) and the electrochemical
cell is placed in an epi-fluorescent microscope that monitors the
fluorescence which, with the use of separately determined calibration
data and the measured vesicle sizes, is converted to intravesicular
pH and the number of transported protons in individual (proteo)liposomes
(see Supporting Information for the calibration
procedure).Examples of time traces of (proteo)liposomes. Example traces are
given for proteoliposomes where protons are pumped throughout the
application of the electrochemical potential (a,b), proton leakage
(c,d), proton uptake/release cessation without leakage (e). An example
trace of a liposome without cytochrome bo3 is also shown (f). Red lines in the example traces (a–f)
are fits to the data (gray) as explained in the text. Proton uptake/release
activity was initiated by applying an electrochemical potential between
time points indicated by the vertical dashed lines.Figure shows a
collection of typical (proteo)liposome time traces, where the intravesicular
pH changes (see Figure S1) are used to
calculate the cumulative number of transported protons. Because of
the low protein-to-lipid ratio used, the majority of the observed
(proteo)liposomes were plain liposomes and did not portray any change
in pH upon reducing the ubiquinone pool electrochemically (Figure f). During the time
window the ubiquinone pool was electrochemically reduced (dashed lines
in Figure ), about
15% of the observed (proteo)liposomes displayed significant pH changes
(0.1 < ΔpH < 1 and in rare cases up to about 2 units).
Indeed, the average number of cytochrome bo3 complexes per (proteo)liposome is calculated to be 0.16 using the
average protein-to-lipid ratio and the average (proteo)liposome size
(see Materials and Methods for details). Assuming
Poissonian dilution of proteins/liposome we would then expect 15%
of liposomes to contain one active protein and ∼1% of liposomes
to have more than one protein. This calculation is concurrent with
our hypothesis that most (proteo)liposomes displaying pH changes are
due to proton uptake/release by single enzymes, which however could
not be confirmed via direct experimental measurement. Deviations from
the calculated average number or proteins/liposome are expected because
of the polydispersity in (proteo)liposome diameter (71 nm with a full
width at half maximum (fwhm) of 45 nm, Figure S8) and hence surface area. Additional deviations at the level
of single particles could be present due to the heterogeneous distribution
of proteins[33] and/or lipids.[34]
Figure 2
Examples of time traces of (proteo)liposomes. Example traces are
given for proteoliposomes where protons are pumped throughout the
application of the electrochemical potential (a,b), proton leakage
(c,d), proton uptake/release cessation without leakage (e). An example
trace of a liposome without cytochrome bo3 is also shown (f). Red lines in the example traces (a–f)
are fits to the data (gray) as explained in the text. Proton uptake/release
activity was initiated by applying an electrochemical potential between
time points indicated by the vertical dashed lines.
The pH values were observed to both increase
and decrease (Figure a and 2b, respectively; hereafter these proteoliposomes
will be described
as “active” liposomes or vesicles), indicating cytochrome bo3 was present in both orientations in the proteoliposomes.
About 76% of active vesicles show a pH increase consistent with a
“right-side out” orientation. The single-enzyme traces
reveal a distribution in turnover rates (Figure ), while in more than 10% of cases, cytochrome bo3 was observed to abruptly halt proton uptake/release
(Figure e). Such dynamic
heterogeneity and “stalling” of activity was observed
for enzymes in both orientations and is a feature typically observed
for (single) enzymes.[29] Importantly, however,
a significant fraction of our single enzyme traces (7.2 ± 1.5%)
also show abrupt turns in pH changes, rapidly destroying formed ΔpH
even when the potential was still applied to reduce the ubiquinone
pool. Such events were observed for cytochrome bo3 in both orientations, as shown in Figure c and d.
Figure 3
Distribution of proton translocation rates
for (top) wild-type
cytochrome bo3 (middle) E286C cytochrome bo3 and (bottom) wild-type cytochrome bo3 in the presence of valinomycin. Cytochrome bo3 was orientated both ways in the single-enzyme
proteoliposomes and relative frequencies are separated for “proton
uptake” (positive rates) and “proton release”
(negative rates). The rates are determined from the slope of the analyzed
data for which examples are shown in Figure . The error bars represent the standard error
of the mean.
Distribution of proton translocation rates
for (top) wild-type
cytochrome bo3 (middle) E286C cytochrome bo3 and (bottom) wild-type cytochrome bo3 in the presence of valinomycin. Cytochrome bo3 was orientated both ways in the single-enzyme
proteoliposomes and relative frequencies are separated for “proton
uptake” (positive rates) and “proton release”
(negative rates). The rates are determined from the slope of the analyzed
data for which examples are shown in Figure . The error bars represent the standard error
of the mean.In order to quantitatively
analyze the heterogeneous activity of
the enzyme and resolve the distinct phases in the time traces (e.g., Figure c–e) without
human bias, an automatic trace analysis was coded and its results
are visualized by the red lines in Figure (see Materials and Methods for details). To reproduce the findings, they were recorded in two
separate laboratories, first in Copenhagen and then in Leeds. Two
different methods varying in experimental setup, pH-dependent fluorescent
probe (HPTS vs SNARF-1), and materials were used, which further support
their validity (see the Independent Verification section in the Supporting Information). Two different image
and data analysis procedures were also tested and compared, and both
methods confirmed the conclusions presented below. The data analysis
procedure resolves phases/events which are statistically distinctive
(proton translocation, proton leakage and the stalling phase) within
the time-traces and yields measurements such as the average proton
translocation rate for each event, the duration of the event, and
the ΔpH at the onset of each event.Cyclic voltammograms
(CVs) of absorbed proteoliposomes of WT and
E286C cytochrome bo3. Electrode preparation
and modification are identical to the single-enzyme experiments except
that 150 nm gold was used, proteoliposomes were reconstituted with
a higher protein-to-lipid ratio (1% w/w) and full layer of proteoliposomes
were immobilized on the electrodes by incubating the electrode with
0.5 mg/mL proteoliposomes for 30 min. CVs (2 mV/s) were measured under
ambient, aerobic conditions at 20 °C. The onset of ubiquinol-10
reduction in the proteoliposomes starts at about −0.05 V vs
SHE. CVs of proteoliposomes before and after addition of 10 μM
valinomycin are shown. A CV of the electrode surface prior to immobilization
of proteoliposomes (blank) is also depicted.The proton translocation rates correspond to an ensemble
average
of 73 ± 2.2 protons s–1 (Figure ), which is less than the published activity
of 520 electrons s–1 in reference[35] and 850 electrons s–1 in reference.[17] We ascribe this difference to various reasons:
(a) only about half of the maximum activity of cytochrome bo3 is reached at the electrochemical potential
used to activate cytochrome bo3 in the
single-enzyme experiments (−0.2 V vs standard hydrogen electrode
(SHE), Figure ) and
(b) Vmax condition cannot be reached using
ubiquinol-10 as the electron donor. Ubiquinol-10 is nearly identical
to the native electron donor in E. coli (ubiquinol-8).
However, previously reported values were measured using substrate
analogues (decyl-ubiquinol[35] or ubiquinol-1[17]) under saturation conditions, while here ubiquinol-10
was added to the (proteo)liposomes under nonsaturating conditions
(1% w/w ubiquinol-10/lipid). Saturation of ubiquinol-10 in the membrane
is not possible due a disrupting effect of high ubiquinol-10 concentrations
and a previously reported substrate inhibition effect.[36]
Figure 4
Cyclic voltammograms
(CVs) of absorbed proteoliposomes of WT and
E286C cytochrome bo3. Electrode preparation
and modification are identical to the single-enzyme experiments except
that 150 nm gold was used, proteoliposomes were reconstituted with
a higher protein-to-lipid ratio (1% w/w) and full layer of proteoliposomes
were immobilized on the electrodes by incubating the electrode with
0.5 mg/mL proteoliposomes for 30 min. CVs (2 mV/s) were measured under
ambient, aerobic conditions at 20 °C. The onset of ubiquinol-10
reduction in the proteoliposomes starts at about −0.05 V vs
SHE. CVs of proteoliposomes before and after addition of 10 μM
valinomycin are shown. A CV of the electrode surface prior to immobilization
of proteoliposomes (blank) is also depicted.
Analysis shows that 7.2 ± 1.5% of
the proton-transporting
proteoliposomes abruptly switch to seemingly passive leaking within
the potential window. The reproducibility and statistical robustness
of our analysis is verified by 4 independent series of experiments
with cytochrome bo3 from two different
overexpressing strains, which show maximum and minimum leak probabilities
ranging from 2.9 to 9.5%. Statistically, these leak events are inconsistent
with multiple enzymes per active vesicle, as it would require two
oppositely orientated cytochrome bo3 complexes
to behave in certain patterns, e.g., one enzyme stopping and the other
starting at about the same time or the slower enzyme halting activity
first. To confirm that leak events are obtained from proteoliposomes
containing single enzymes, the experiments were repeated with an average
protein-to-lipid ratio 1 order of magnitude lower, where the stochastic
probability of having two oppositely oriented protein complexes is
2 orders of magnitude lower (<0.1%). As expected, the number of
(proteo)liposomes displaying pH changes was significantly reduced
(2.5% ± 0.33%), but the abrupt switch was still observed for
3.2% ± 0.65% of the active vesicles (4 independent experiments
with leak state percentages between 1.9 and 4.5%). We propose that
these data further confirm that the leak activity is due to single
proteoliposomes with single enzymes.Although it is known that
membrane pores can randomly form in the
presence of ΔpH, pores are transient, submillisecond events.[37,38] The observed lifetime of the leaking events (>10 s) is thus inconsistent
with spontaneous pore formation in the lipid membrane of the vesicles.
Furthermore, the proton permeability of the reconstituted proteoliposomes
was independently measured by applying a ΔpH to the reconstituted
proteoliposomes and empty liposomes under nonturnover conditions.
In both cases the recorded “background” proton leaking
rate is significantly lower than the observed leak states of cytochrome bo3 (Figure S2), confirming
that background proton permeability is negligible under our conditions.
Furthermore, the fact that we observe similar background proton permeability
for proteoliposomes reconstituted with cytochrome bo3 and empty liposomes verifies that leaking is not an
artifact of the reconstitution method. Taken together the abrupt changes
in proton transport direction are most likely due to single enzyme-related
proton leakage into or out of the proteoliposomes.A simple
explanation for the observed leak events and stalling
is that they are due to irreversible inactivation or damage to cytochrome bo3. Because less than 10% of the proteoliposomes
enter the leak state and because the time-span of the experiments
is limited (up to 100 s of active turnover) it is not possible to
directly observe the rare recovery events. In addition, there is also
the possibility, albeit low, of proteoliposomes containing two enzymes
(or two proteolipsomes are less than 200 nm apart) and thus registering
“false” recovery events. We therefore analyzed the relative
number of proteoliposomes in consecutive movies on the same electrode
(Figure S3). The percentage of the proteoliposomes
containing cytochrome bo3 that actively
take up/release protons does not decrease when movies were taken sequentially.
The movies were taken from different areas on the same electrode,
but lipid vesicles that were not being fluorescently imaged are still
subjected to the same electrical potential applied to the gold electrode
which would start the enzyme turnover. Therefore, if cytochrome bo3 could not revert back to normal proton translocation
after entering the leak state or the stalling phase, the percentage
of active vesicles would have shown a continuous decline. The lack
of such downward trend indicates that both the leak state and the
stalling phase are reversible.It is generally accepted that
back-flow of protons during turnover
of HCOs is prevented by a gate in the D-channel.[28,39] We hypothesized that the long-lived leak events are caused by a
conformational change causing the gate to “open” allowing
protons to freely flow back. Glutamic acid 286 (E242 in bovine heart
Complex IV) is highly conserved in Type A1 HCOs and lies at the end
of the D-channel.[1] It has been suggested
that E286 is an integral part of the gating mechanism[28,39] and to test this hypothesis, the same measurement and analysis was
applied using an E286C mutant.In E286C cytochrome bo3, proton translocation
through the D-channel is blocked and protons are prevented from being
pumped across the membrane.[39] It is worth
noting that besides the pumped protons, redox reactions in cytochrome bo3 result in a further net translocation of
four “chemical protons” across the membrane: the reduction
of every dioxygen molecule draws four protons from the cytoplasmic
side and another four protons are released into the periplasm after
the oxidation of two ubiquinols.[2] The E286C
mutant is catalytically active (Figure and 4) and thus able to generate
a ΔpH via the net translocation of “chemical protons”.
We note here that ubiquinone is also protonated when electrochemically
reduced at the electrode. However, since electrons cannot transfer
across the lipid bilayer, this process takes up protons from solution
only (i.e., from outside the vesicles) and should therefore not influence
the intravesicular pH.The orientation of E286C cytochrome bo3 is similar to wild type (WT): 66% of proteoliposomes
with E286C
cytochrome bo3 take up protons from the
inside of the lipid vesicle (alkalinization), compared to 76% of WT.
The oxygen-reducing activity of E286C cytochrome bo3 as measured by the electrochemical current (Figure ) is about 15–20%
of that of wild-type cytochrome bo3, depending
on the potential at which the comparison is made. The lower proton-transporting
activity of E286C cytochrome (22% of that of WT, Figure ) is consistent with the lower
oxygen reducing activity, although higher than expected considering
the fact that E286C cytochrome bo3 can
only release/uptake one proton per electron rather than two for wild-type
cytochrome bo3. This we attribute to the
data analysis and noise levels, as very low proton uptake/release
rates are hard to detect.The relative frequency (in percentage) of entering
the leak state
during turnover in relation to the leaking rate and the ΔpH
formed prior to the start of the leaking events. These figures are
two-dimensional histograms generated in the same way as the conventional
one-dimensional histogram (the color of the pixels is equivalent to
the height of the bars in histogram bar chart). The sum of the relative
frequency values in each heat map equals to the total relative frequency
of proteoliposomes entering the leak state in the corresponding experiment.
The ΔpH is the intravesicular pH minus the pH of the bulk solution
(set constant at 7.4).The single-enzyme experiments show that the relative frequency
by which E286C enters the leak state is significantly reduced to 0.6%
(0.5% and 1% in two independent data sets each containing eight and
20 movies, respectively), compared to 7.2% for wild-type cytochrome bo3. Besides the significantly reduced percentage
of leak events observed for E286C cytochrome bo3, the leaking rates are also significantly lower for E286C
(25.5 ± 4.1 H+/s vs 102.3 ± 11.2 H+/s for the wild-type, Figure ). We propose that these results further substantiate that
the leak events observed from wild-type cytochrome bo3 are caused by a leak state of the proton pump and not
by oppositely orientated enzymes or pore formation in the lipid membrane.
Although the results from the E286C mutant confirm that protons leak
through the protein, they do not unambiguously show that protons flow
via the D-pathway and more work is needed to identify the leak pathway.
Because this mutant is less active than WT, the E286C mutation could
allosterically reduce the probability that a leak state is formed.
Indeed, on average, the lifetime of proton uptake/release in E286C
cytochrome is about 25% longer than WT (Figure S4), but as lifetimes longer than 100s were capped because
of the technical limitations on for how long an experiment can continue,
this should be considered a lower limit. Therefore, there is an indication
that the E286C mutant may have a longer lifetime for proton uptake/release.
Related to this, the “stalling” behavior was observed
in only 4% of the active vesicles.
Figure 5
The relative frequency (in percentage) of entering
the leak state
during turnover in relation to the leaking rate and the ΔpH
formed prior to the start of the leaking events. These figures are
two-dimensional histograms generated in the same way as the conventional
one-dimensional histogram (the color of the pixels is equivalent to
the height of the bars in histogram bar chart). The sum of the relative
frequency values in each heat map equals to the total relative frequency
of proteoliposomes entering the leak state in the corresponding experiment.
The ΔpH is the intravesicular pH minus the pH of the bulk solution
(set constant at 7.4).
The relative frequency (in percentage)
of cytochrome bo3 entering the leak state
or stalling phase within the
time resolution of the experiment as a function of ΔpH. (a)
the average frequencies that a ΔpH is encountered during a 2.6
s period of the time trace (i.e., the time resolution); (b,c) the
distribution of the ΔpH formed just before entering the leak
state or stalling phase, respectively; (d,e): the relative frequency
of cytochrome bo3 entering the leak state
or stalling phase, respectively, as a function of ΔpH, which
was calculated by dividing the frequencies in (b) and (c) by those
in (a) for each independent experiment; the error bars show the standard
error of the mean from 4 independent experiments. The negative ΔpH
and negative proton release rates (acidification) have been converted
to the absolute (positive) values. The ΔpH is the intravesicular
pH minus the pH of the bulk solution (constant at 7.4).We next examined whether the existence of the leak
state may have
a potential regulatory role. A possible cause that triggers cytochrome bo3 into the leak state is a thermodynamically
limiting PMF, i.e., high ΔpH and/or high membrane potential. Figure shows that the leak
states may be initiated at all ΔpH (horizontal axis in the heat
map), and many leaking events started at low ΔpH. However, the
relative frequency shown in Figure is the frequency observed for the total population
of active vesicles, which does not take into account that the majority
of active vesicles never reached a high ΔpH or the fact that
high ΔpH are only obtained for a relatively short time periods
(Figure a). Figure d shows that by normalizing
the frequency of the leak state against the relative occurrence of
a ΔpH, the leak states is more likely to be initiated at higher
ΔpH. The result of Kendall tau rank correlation test shows that
the relative frequency of entering a leak state from all repeated
experiments is indeed positively correlated to the ΔpH (p < 0.01, τ = 1). The same analysis shows that
the probability of entering a stalling phase is similarly correlated
to the ΔpH (Figure e). Thus, our data suggest that cytochrome bo3 might have evolved two mechanisms to control excessive
ΔpH and either halts proton translocation or enters a proton
leak state, dissipating the formed PMF. As mentioned above, the E286C
mutant exhibits a longer lifetime of proton translocation. As the
relative frequencies of the leak and stalling states of cytochrome bo3 are dependent on the ΔpH (Figure ), the longer lifetime
could thus indirectly be due to the slower proton uptake/release activity
of E286C cytochrome bo3 compared to WT.
Figure 6
The relative frequency (in percentage)
of cytochrome bo3 entering the leak state
or stalling phase within the
time resolution of the experiment as a function of ΔpH. (a)
the average frequencies that a ΔpH is encountered during a 2.6
s period of the time trace (i.e., the time resolution); (b,c) the
distribution of the ΔpH formed just before entering the leak
state or stalling phase, respectively; (d,e): the relative frequency
of cytochrome bo3 entering the leak state
or stalling phase, respectively, as a function of ΔpH, which
was calculated by dividing the frequencies in (b) and (c) by those
in (a) for each independent experiment; the error bars show the standard
error of the mean from 4 independent experiments. The negative ΔpH
and negative proton release rates (acidification) have been converted
to the absolute (positive) values. The ΔpH is the intravesicular
pH minus the pH of the bulk solution (constant at 7.4).
We next examined the role of transmembrane potential on triggering
the leak state. Proteoliposomes are ideally suited for this as it
has long been recognized that due to small volume in proteoliposomes,
proton transport alone can build up a membrane potential.[40] To probe the influence of the membrane potential,
the same experiment and analysis were performed on the wild-type cytochrome bo3 in the presence of a potassium ion carrier,
valinomycin, which will significantly reduce or eliminate the membrane
potential, while retaining the ΔpH. By comparing the results
of cytochrome bo3 alone and cytochrome bo3 with valinomycin in Figure , it is clear that valinomycin lowers the
leaking rate (see also Figure S5). On average,
the presence of valinomycin reduced the leaking rate by 60%, confirming
that a significant membrane potential is present and thus that proton
transfer by cytochrome bo3 contributes
to the formation of both terms of the PMF in our single-enzyme experiments
(ΔpH and membrane potential). The relative frequency, however,
with which cytochrome bo3 enters the leak
state is not reduced by the presence or absence of valinomycin. As
without valinomycin, the relative frequency of entering the leak state
is correlated to the ΔpH in the presence of valinomycin (Figure
S6, see SI for a further discussion on
the effect of valinomycin on the proton transport activity of cytochrome bo3). These observations suggest that entering
the leak state may be primarily triggered by the ΔpH, though
we cannot fully exclude that a larger membrane potential can also
trigger a leak state. In contrast, the rate of the proton back flow
once a leak state is obtained seems to be driven by both elements
of the PMF (Figure ) suggesting that the leak state is due to a protein conformation
that allows protons to freely flow backward, in a fashion similar
to a proton channel.
Conclusion
We conclude that a long-lifetime
leak state exists in cytochrome bo3 during
continuous enzyme turnover, which
allows the back flow of protons. The leak state and the stalling in
enzyme activity may act as a safety fuse that is triggered by excessive
ΔpH during respiration in E. coli. Previous
study shows that ROS production in mitochondria may be much more sensitive
to ΔpH than to membrane potential.[41] Although seemingly inefficient in terms of energy conservation,
proton leakage in small subpopulations of HCOs in a living organism
might help to alleviate respiratory pressure and factors related to
ROS production. The existence of the long-lifetime proton leak state
and the stalling phase may provide an unprecedented insight into the
proton pumping mechanism and its regulation in HCOs. Deciphering the
precise role of proton leakage of proton transporters as well as its
dependence on regulatory inputs and point mutations by assays like
these will pave the way for controlling transport related diseased
states.
Materials and Methods
Protein Purification and
Reconstitution
All chemicals
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise stated. Wild-type
and E286C cytochrome bo3 were purified
from Escherichia coli C43 strains with the bo3 gene knocked out from chromosome, where proteins
were expressed from pET plasmids containing the corresponding gene
sequences.[39] Wild-type cytochrome bo3 was also purified from GO105/pJRhisA[42] for comparison. Proteins were purified similarly
as previously reported.[35] Cytochrome bo3 concentration was determined by its Soret
band at 409 nm (ε = 188 mM–1 cm–1). Protein was reconstituted following a method published previously,[17] except 20 mM MOPS buffer was used instead of
HEPES. Before Bio-Beads were added, the pH sensitive dye, 8-hydroxypyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic
acid trisodium salt (HPTS), was added to a final concentration of
5 mM. The lipid mixture used for the reconstitution was E.
coli polar lipid extract (Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc., Alabama,
U.S.A.) mixed with the following: 1% (w/w) ubiquinone-10 and 0.4%
(w/w) ATTO-633 labeled DOPE (ATTO-TEC GmbH, Germany). The protein-to-lipid
weight percentage added for the reconstitution is 0.2%. Insoluble
materials, possibly denatured protein, were removed by low-speed centrifugation
at 17 000 RCF for 5 min at the end of the reconstitution. Standard
BCA and Schaffner & Weissmann assays were both used to quantify
the amount of protein that is actually reconstituted into lipid vesicles,
and the loss of lipid during reconstitution was also quantified by
the absorption of the ATTO633 labeled lipid. The results show that
the final protein to dry lipid ratio (w/w) is 0.073 ± 0.004%.
To estimate the average number of bo3 complexes
in a single vesicle, the following values were used: the protein/lipid
weight ratio (0.073%), the size of the vesicle (70 nm), the thickness
of the lipid bilayer (5 nm), the average surface area of the lipid
headgroup (65 Å2), the molecular weight of the protein
(144 kDa), and the average molecular weight of the lipid (760). Under
the assumption that a lipid vesicle is a double-layered sphere with
an outer diameter of 70 nm and an inner diameter of 70 – 2
× 5 = 60 nm, one can calculate the number of lipid molecules
in a vesicle. Using the protein/lipid ratio, one can further calculate,
on average, how many protein complexes are present in a vesicle. Dynamic
light scattering data showed that (proteo)liposomes in this study
were highly monodispersed and are about 70 nm in diameter (Figure S7).
Electrochemistry-Microscopy
Measurement
The experimental
setup was refined from a method reported previously[42] to enable single-molecule measurements. Template-stripped
gold electrodes with highly smooth transparent gold layers on glass
substrates were functionalized with a 6-mercapto-1-hexanol (6-MH)
self-assembled monolayer (SAM). They were prepared by the following
procedure: 30-nanometer gold layers were thermally evaporated on polished
silicon wafers (IDB Technologies Ltd., U.K.) with an Edwards Auto
306 evaporator (Edwards, U.K.) at a pressure ≤2 × 10–6 millibar. Standard-thickness glass coverslips were
then glued to the gold layer with a low-fluorescence epoxy glue (301–2FL,
Epoxy Technology, Inc., Massachusetts, U.S.A.). After the glue cured,
coverslips were carefully removed from the silicon wafers, during
which the gold layer was stripped off the wafers, retaining the high
smoothness of the silicon wafer template. The SAM layer was made by
incubating the gold electrodes in 1 mM 6-MH solution in water overnight
at 20 °C. The gold electrode is a part of a custom-built electrochemical
cell that can be used with an inverted epi-fluorescence microscope
(Eclipse Ti–U, Nikon Instruments, U.K.). After assembling the
electrochemical cell, (proteo)liposomes were sparsely absorbed to
the gold electrode by incubating the gold surface with a diluted suspension
(2 μg/mL lipid) for 30 min at 20 °C followed by a thorough
washing step to remove unbound (proteo)liposomes and nonencapsulated
HPTS dye. We note that the experiments are conducted under ambient
conditions and in ensemble experiments we have previously shown that
this ensures that cytochrome bo3 remains
saturated with oxygen throughout the experiment.[36]Images and image series were recorded using a 60×
oil immersion objective (N.A. = 1.40, Nikon Instruments, U.K.), and
an Andor Zyla 5.5 sCMOS Camera system (Andor Technology Ltd., U.K.).
Fluorescence filters used in this study were from Chroma Technology
Corporation (Vermont, U.S.A.): (1) D470/20X, excitation of one of
the HPTS channels; (2) D410/30X, for excitation in another HPTS channel;
(3) HQ535/48M, emission of both HPTS channels; (4) 500dcxr, dichroic
mirror for both HPTS channels; (5) HQ620/60X, excitation of the ATTO633
fluorescence; (6) HQ700/75M, emission of the ATTO633 fluorescence;
(7) Q660lp, dichroic mirror for ATTO633 fluorescence. The original
images are 2560-by-2160 pixel/179-by-151 μm. The magnification
is 60 (objective) × 1.5 (relay lens) = 90 times. The exposure
time is 1 s for each channel, and the frame rate is 2.6 s–1, including 0.6 s for rotating the filter cubes. A typical image
series contains about 500–1000 lipid vesicles. Examples of
the full-scale images are shown in Figure S9.A potentiostat (Chi604c, CH Instruments, Inc., Texas, U.S.A.)
was
used to control the potential between the working electrode (the gold
electrode with lipid vesicles) and a Ag/AgCl/sat. KCl (199 mV vs Standard
Hydrogen Electrode, SHE) reference electrode (Radiometer Analytical
SAS, France). A platinum wire was used as the counter electrode. When
the potential is applied to the gold electrode, the ubiquinone pool
in the vesicles’ lipid bilayer is electrochemically reduced
and after diffusion through the vesicle, donates electrons to cytochrome bo3, initiating oxygen reduction and proton uptake/release.
Recording of image series was initiated while the potentiostat was
switched off. After a given amount of time (typically 30 or 100 s)
the potentiostat cell was switched on to maintain a constant potential
of −0.2 V vs SHE for 100 s. This potential is optimal based
on previous results.[42] The potentiostat
was then switched off again but the image recording would continue
for certain amount of time (typically 100 or 150 s). When the electrochemical
potential is terminated, the proton uptake/release activity is found
to halt within the time resolution of this study and, thus, the enzyme
activity is tightly controlled by the potentiostat. There is a minimum
of 15 min waiting period between each recording to allow the ΔpH
and membrane potential to dissipate, and the fields of view of different
recording sessions do not overlap. Typically 5 recordings were done
on each gold electrode due to the limit of their available surface
area. Each experimental system (wild-type bo3, E286C mutant and valinomycin) contains data collected from
different batches of preparation and each batch contains recordings
from multiple electrodes. The numbers of independent lipid vesicles
analyzed in each of the three experimental system described in the
main text were on the scale of 19 000–30 000,
of which about 3000 vesicles exhibit proton uptake/release.Experiments with valinomycin added were done with the following
steps. Cytochrome bo3 was reconstituted
using the same protocol as above and valinomycin was added to a final
concentration of 10 μM with the lipid concentration adjusted
to 4.4 mg/mL. The approximate molar ratio of valinomycin to lipidis 1.8 × 10–3. The valinomycin was incubated
with (proteo)liposomes for 15 min before further dilution to 2 μg/mL
lipid and absorption onto the gold electrode, as above. However, after
unbound (proteo)liposomes and nonencapsulated HPTS dye were removed
by washing, a new valinomycin/liposome mixture (10 μM and 4.4
mg/mL, respectively; liposomes were without HPTS or cytochrome bo3) was added to the solution to replenish the
loss of valinomycin during the incubation and washing and keep the
ratio of lipid and valinomycin relatively constant. Since the liposomes
added here do not contain any fluorescent dye or fluorescently labeled
lipid, they do not interfere with the image recording.
Data Analysis
Before the start of an experiment a single
fluorescence image was taken to obtain the ATTO-633 fluorescence intensity
of individual (proteo)liposomes containing 0.4% (w/w) ATTO-633 labeled
DOPE. This image was used to calculate the diameter of the (proteo)liposomes
with a method similar to that previously published.[43] Dynamic light scattering (Zetasizer Nano ZS, Malvern Instruments
Ltd., U.K.) data were used to establish a calibration curve between
ATTO-633 fluorescence and the diameter of the vesicles. Figure S8 shows that the conversion from ATTO
fluorescence to diameter does not distort the size distribution of
the lipid vesicles.Fluorescent image time-traces were recorded
alternating between the excitation filters for HPTS fluorescence.
Image series were registered and corrected for drifting using ImageJ
StackReg plug-in.[44] All subsequent analysis
was performed in MATLAB R2012a (MathWorks, Massachusetts, U.S.A.)
using user-written code. Lipid vesicles were identified on each frame
of the image series and a two-dimensional Gaussian function was used
to fit each vesicle HPTS fluorescence image. Using user-written code,
comprehensive and automatic quality checking was carried out for each
fitting on every frame to eliminate conglomerates, close-by vesicles,
vesicle desorption during recording and vesicles on the edge of images.
The code was written assuming the following: (1) single vesicles will
appear as circular bright spots on the image; (2) because the bright
spots are sparsely distributed on the images, the majority of them
are single vesicles; (3) a cluster of vesicles will appear either
noncircular or much larger. An automated image analysis was performed
with MATLAB to remove noncircular spots or spots larger than expected
for single vesicles. As the vesicles are sparsely adsorbed, an accurate
value for the background intensity can be determined. Vesicles are
then identified by the MATLAB code by finding pixels above certain
threshold intensity. Then a 12-by-12 (pixel) local image (∼0.84
× 0.84 μm) around the bright pixel was fitted to a 2-dimension
Gaussian function. The fitting returns 4 parameters (baseline, amplitude,
X-spread and Y-spread) and the fitting error at each pixel. These
results are used to reject bright spots with the following characteristics:
(1) fitting error above 20% (comparing to the original intensity data)
at any pixel; (2) fitting error above 10% overall (in the 12-by-12
area); (3) circularity below 0.8; (4) fwhm is below 35 nm (= 0.5 pixel)
or above 175 nm (= 2.5 pixel); (5) amplitude above background is below
1000 AU (arbitrary unit, background is about 3000 AU with a standard
deviation about 150 AU); (6) baseline above 10 000 AU (this
is usually concurrent with a large fwhm); (7) too close to the edge
of image (6 pixel); (8) having another bright spot within 700 nm;
(9) the fitted center is more than 2 pixel away from the brightest
pixel (this is usually concurrent with a large fwhm); (10) in addition,
after all images in a movie are fitted, if any of the above criteria
is not satisfied in more than 30% of the frames of the movie, the
vesicle is rejected entirely. The above criteria were chosen because
they result in picking circular and separated bright spots with a
typical size that is consistent with single vesicles.The ratio
of the fluorescence intensity of HPTS with the two excitation
filters was used to calculate the pH inside the individual (proteo)liposome
at the time of measurement. A calibration curve was established to
convert the ratiometric HPTS data to pH. This calibration was done
by measuring single (proteo)liposomes’ HPTS fluorescence in
the same procedure as described above at different pH values. Different
pH points were achieved by changing the bulk solution’s pH
and adding 100 ng/mL nigericin and 100 ng/mL gramicidin to equilibrate
the intravesicular pH with the outside. Because of the presence of
gramicidin and nigericin, the intravesicular pH equals the pH of the
bulk solution, and the bulk solution pH was measured. Therefore, the
calibration procedure can effectively control the intravesicular pH.
The fluorescence images for pH-fluorescence calibration were taken
using the same procedure as the movies. The fluorescence data and
pH were fitted to a Henderson–Hasselbalch equation and the
parameters obtained were used to convert HPTS ratiometric fluorescence
to intravesicular pH during turnover of cytochrome bo3. The fitting results are given in Supporting Information (Figure S10 and Table S1). The number
of protons taken/released was then calculated based on the diameter
of lipid vesicle, the pH change and the buffering effect of MOPS buffer,
HPTS and the lipids. We note that the obtained time traces, such as
shown in Figure ,
are qualitatively identical irrespective of whether pH or cumulative
number of transported protons is plotted (compare Figure with Figure S1). To calculate the cumulative number of transported protons,
the concentrations of MOPS buffer and HPTS encapsulated within the
lipid vesicles were assumed to be the same as the bulk solution. The
buffering capacity of lipids was determined empirically by a titration
beforehand while the lipid surface area of single vesicles was calculated
from the vesicle size. The buffering capacity of MOPS and HPTS are
calculated using the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation. Each (proteo)liposome’s
change in the pH and the number of taken/released protons were then
calculated and stored.The sections of time traces recorded
after the applied potential
was switched off were fitted with an exponential decay function. The
sections of the time traces within the potential window were then
analyzed using user-written code to detect the proton taken up/released
and leaking events. This automatic analysis is based on the hypothesis
that a correlation between the pH/number-of proton taken up/released
and time indicates either an active proton uptake/release or leaking
event. It consists of fitting the data to models of one or multiple
joint lines and, for each line (segment), the calculation of Kendall
tau rank correlation coefficient. In order to prevent overfitting
of the trace by multiple lines, the fitting would start with a single
linear regression (a single segment). If the standard deviation of
the residual was less than 110% of the standard deviation of the trace,
the procedure was stopped and the Kendall tau value determined. The
standard deviation of the trace is independently determined using
the data prior to the application of the potential. It is assumed
that the intravesicular pH before the applying a potential is constant
and that the noise level is consistent during the entire trace. If
the standard deviation of the residual of the segment is higher than
110%, the data is fitted to two joined segments (i.e., the start of
the second segment joins with the end of the first segment), where
an iterative process is used to determine, based on the best fit,
at which time-point the two segments are connected. If any of the
segments still has a residue with a standard deviation above 110%,
this process is continued.To further check if the use of multiple
segments is statistically
justified, adjusted R2 values are determined
for fits using one, two or more segments, and the fit with the highest
adjusted R2 value is used. Adjusted R2 takes into account the degrees of freedom
in relation to the number of fitted parameters. P-values were calculated as part of the Kendall test on the resolved
sections from the model fitting and only the sections of time traces
with P-values below the threshold of 0.05 (95% confidence
level) were accepted as proton uptake/release or leaking events. Proton
uptake/release or leaking rates are taken from the slopes of the segments.
The data was analyzed with higher and lower confidence levels and
was found to be qualitatively identical. Finally, a leak event is
defined as a change in the sign of a slope for two adjoining segments,
where it is assumed that the first segment is due to active proton
uptake/release.
Authors: M L Verkhovskaya; A Garcìa-Horsman; A Puustinen; J L Rigaud; J E Morgan; M I Verkhovsky; M Wikström Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1997-09-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yongfang Zhao; Daniel S Terry; Lei Shi; Matthias Quick; Harel Weinstein; Scott C Blanchard; Jonathan A Javitch Journal: Nature Date: 2011-04-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Elena A B Azizan; Hanne Poulsen; Petronel Tuluc; Junhua Zhou; Michael V Clausen; Andreas Lieb; Carmela Maniero; Sumedha Garg; Elena G Bochukova; Wanfeng Zhao; Lalarukh Haris Shaikh; Cheryl A Brighton; Ada E D Teo; Anthony P Davenport; Tanja Dekkers; Bas Tops; Benno Küsters; Jiri Ceral; Giles S H Yeo; Sudeshna Guha Neogi; Ian McFarlane; Nitzan Rosenfeld; Francesco Marass; James Hadfield; Wojciech Margas; Kanchan Chaggar; Miroslav Solar; Jaap Deinum; Annette C Dolphin; I Sadaf Farooqi; Joerg Striessnig; Poul Nissen; Morris J Brown Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2013-08-04 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Salome Veshaguri; Sune M Christensen; Gerdi C Kemmer; Garima Ghale; Mads P Møller; Christina Lohr; Andreas L Christensen; Bo H Justesen; Ida L Jørgensen; Jürgen Schiller; Nikos S Hatzakis; Michael Grabe; Thomas Günther Pomorski; Dimitrios Stamou Journal: Science Date: 2016-03-25 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Mette Galsgaard Malle; Philipp M G Löffler; Søren S-R Bohr; Magnus Berg Sletfjerding; Nikolaj Alexander Risgaard; Simon Bo Jensen; Min Zhang; Per Hedegård; Stefan Vogel; Nikos S Hatzakis Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2022-04-04 Impact factor: 24.274
Authors: Nika Marušič; Lado Otrin; Ziliang Zhao; Rafael B Lira; Fotis L Kyrilis; Farzad Hamdi; Panagiotis L Kastritis; Tanja Vidaković-Koch; Ivan Ivanov; Kai Sundmacher; Rumiana Dimova Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Simon Bo Jensen; Sara Thodberg; Shaheena Parween; Matias E Moses; Cecilie C Hansen; Johannes Thomsen; Magnus B Sletfjerding; Camilla Knudsen; Rita Del Giudice; Philip M Lund; Patricia R Castaño; Yanet G Bustamante; Maria Natalia Rojas Velazquez; Flemming Steen Jørgensen; Amit V Pandey; Tomas Laursen; Birger Lindberg Møller; Nikos S Hatzakis Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: V Vasilca; A Sadeghpour; S Rawson; L E Hawke; S A Baldwin; T Wilkinson; D Bannister; V L G Postis; M Rappolt; S P Muench; L J C Jeuken Journal: Anal Biochem Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 3.365