Literature DB >> 26614881

Use of Health Information Exchange and Repeat Imaging Costs.

Hye-Young Jung1, Joshua R Vest2, Mark A Unruh2, Lisa M Kern3, Rainu Kaushal4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to quantify the association between health information exchange (HIE) use and cost savings attributable to repeat imaging.
METHODS: Imaging procedures associated with HIE were compared with concurrent controls on the basis of propensity score matching over the period from 2009 to 2010 in a longitudinal cohort study. The study sample (n = 12,620) included patients ages 18 years and older enrolled in the two largest commercial health plans in a 13-county region of western New York State served by the Rochester Regional Health Information Organization. The primary outcome was a continuous measure of costs associated with repeat imaging. The determinant of interest, HIE use, was defined as system access after the initial imaging procedure and before repeat imaging.
RESULTS: HIE use was associated with an overall estimated annual savings of $32,460 in avoided repeat imaging, or $2.57 per patient. Basic imaging (radiography, ultrasound, and mammography) accounted for 85% of the estimated avoided cases of repeat imaging. Advanced imaging (CT and MRI) accounted for 13% of avoided procedures but constituted half of the estimated savings (50%).
CONCLUSIONS: HIE systems may reduce costs associated with repeat imaging. Although inexpensive imaging procedures constituted the largest proportion of avoided repeat imaging in our study, most of the estimated cost savings were due to small reductions in repeated advanced imaging procedures. HIE systems will need to be leveraged in ways that facilitate greater reductions in advanced imaging to achieve appreciable cost savings.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiology; electronic health records; health care costs; health information exchange; utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26614881      PMCID: PMC4722040          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  36 in total

1.  Patient-centered Imaging.

Authors:  Stephen J Swensen
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Does health information exchange reduce unnecessary neuroimaging and improve quality of headache care in the emergency department?

Authors:  James E Bailey; Jim Y Wan; Lisa M Mabry; Stephen H Landy; Rebecca A Pope; Teresa M Waters; Mark E Frisse
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Health insurers and medical-imaging policy--a work in progress.

Authors:  John K Iglehart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Trends in the utilization of medical imaging from 2003 to 2011: clinical encounters offer a complementary patient-centered focus.

Authors:  Martey S Dodoo; Richard Duszak; Danny R Hughes
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Physician orders contribute to high-tech imaging slowdown.

Authors:  David C Levin; Vijay M Rao; Laurence Parker
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  The overuse of diagnostic imaging and the Choosing Wisely initiative.

Authors:  Vijay M Rao; David C Levin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Health information technology's problems.

Authors:  C Peter Waegemann
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Insight into the sharing of medical images: physician, other health care providers, and staff experience in a variety of medical settings.

Authors:  J C Sandberg; Y Ge; H T Nguyen; T A Arcury; A J Johnson; W Hwang; H D Gage; T Reynolds; J J Carr
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  Giving office-based physicians electronic access to patients' prior imaging and lab results did not deter ordering of tests.

Authors:  Danny McCormick; David H Bor; Stephanie Woolhandler; David U Himmelstein
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.894

View more
  8 in total

1.  The associations between query-based and directed health information exchange with potentially avoidable use of health care services.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Mark Aaron Unruh; Jason S Shapiro; Lawrence P Casalino
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Trends in user-initiated health information exchange in the inpatient, outpatient, and emergency settings.

Authors:  Saurabh Rahurkar; Joshua R Vest; John T Finnell; Brian E Dixon
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  New EHR certification requirements and their association with duplicate tests and images.

Authors:  Yuriy Pylypchuk; Christian Johnson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 7.942

4.  Health Information Exchange between Specialists and General Practitioners Benefits Rural Patients.

Authors:  Masaharu Nakayama; Ryusuke Inoue; Satoshi Miyata; Hiroaki Shimizu
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.762

5.  Diverging views on health information exchange organizations.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Mari F Greenberger; Audrey Garnatz
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2017-06-12

6.  The implications and impact of 3 approaches to health information exchange: community, enterprise, and vendor-mediated health information exchange.

Authors:  Jordan Everson
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2017-01-06

7.  A Model to Improve the Workflow for Radiation Treatments in the Era of Bundled Payments: A Quality Improvement Project Report.

Authors:  Toms Vengaloor Thomas; Margie Jeanann Suggs; Ashley N Jones; Jeremy P Otts; George Russell; Srinivasan Vijayakumar; Robert Allbright
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-01-21

8.  Key Factors Affecting Ambulatory Care Providers' Electronic Exchange of Health Information With Affiliated and Unaffiliated Partners: Web-Based Survey Study.

Authors:  John C Pendergrass; Ranganathan Chandrasekaran
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2019-11-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.