Literature DB >> 23646092

Insight into the sharing of medical images: physician, other health care providers, and staff experience in a variety of medical settings.

J C Sandberg1, Y Ge, H T Nguyen, T A Arcury, A J Johnson, W Hwang, H D Gage, T Reynolds, J J Carr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scant knowledge exists describing health care providers' and staffs' experiences sharing imaging studies. Additional research is needed to determine the extent to which imaging studies are shared in diverse health care settings, and the extent to which provider or practice characteristics are associated with barriers to viewing external imaging studies on portable media.
OBJECTIVE: This analysis uses qualitative data to 1) examine how providers and their staff accessed outside medical imaging studies, 2) examine whether use or the desire to use imaging studies conducted at outside facilities varied by provider specialty or location (urban, suburban, and small town) and 3) delineate difficulties experienced by providers or staff as they attempted to view and use imaging studies available on portable media.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 85 health care providers and medical facility staff from urban, suburban, and small town medical practices in North Carolina and Virginia. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, then systematically analyzed using ATLAS.ti.
RESULTS: Physicians at family and pediatric medicine practices rely primarily on written reports for medical studies other than X-rays; and thus do not report difficulties accessing outside imaging studies. Subspecialists in urban, suburban, and small towns view imaging studies through internal communication systems, internet portals, or portable media. Many subspecialists and their staff report experiencing difficulty and time delays in accessing and using imaging studies on portable media.
CONCLUSION: Subspecialists have distinct needs for viewing imaging studies that are not shared by typical primary care providers. As development and implementation of technical strategies to share medical records continue, this variation in need and use should be noted. The sharing and viewing of medical imaging studies on portable media is often inefficient and fails to meet the needs of many subspeciality physicians, and can lead to repeated imaging studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical record systems; compact disks*; electronic health records; hospital information systems; radiology information PACS

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23646092      PMCID: PMC3613038          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2012-06-RA-0022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  22 in total

1.  Does health information exchange reduce unnecessary neuroimaging and improve quality of headache care in the emergency department?

Authors:  James E Bailey; Jim Y Wan; Lisa M Mabry; Stephen H Landy; Rebecca A Pope; Teresa M Waters; Mark E Frisse
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Qualitative evaluation of health information exchange efforts.

Authors:  Joan S Ash; Kenneth P Guappone
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Emergency physicians' perceptions of health information exchange.

Authors:  Jason S Shapiro; Joseph Kannry; Andre W Kushniruk; Gilad Kuperman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Reviewing images from portable media: an ongoing challenge.

Authors:  Katarzyna J Macura; John A Carrino; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Launching HITECH.

Authors:  David Blumenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Informatics in radiology: image exchange: IHE and the evolution of image sharing.

Authors:  David S Mendelson; Peter R G Bak; Elliot Menschik; Eliot Siegel
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 7.  Medical image and data sharing: are we there yet?

Authors:  Adam E Flanders
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 8.  Health information technology: transforming chronic disease management and care transitions.

Authors:  Shaline Rao; Craig Brammer; Aaron McKethan; Melinda B Buntin
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.907

9.  Physician attitudes toward health information exchange: results of a statewide survey.

Authors:  Adam Wright; Christine Soran; Chelsea A Jenter; Lynn A Volk; David W Bates; Steven R Simon
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Electronic health records: use, barriers and satisfaction among physicians who care for black and Hispanic patients.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; David W Bates; Chelsea Jenter; E John Orav; Jie Zheng; Paul Cleary; Steven R Simon
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 2.431

View more
  3 in total

1.  Using a health information exchange system for imaging information: patterns and predictors.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Zachary M Grinspan; Lisa M Kern; Thomas R Campion; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

Review 2.  Image Sharing Technologies and Reduction of Imaging Utilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Hye-Young Jung; Aaron Ostrovsky; Lala Tanmoy Das; Geraldine B McGinty
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Use of Health Information Exchange and Repeat Imaging Costs.

Authors:  Hye-Young Jung; Joshua R Vest; Mark A Unruh; Lisa M Kern; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.532

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.