Shuangjiang Li1, Jun Fan1, Jian Zhou2, Yutao Ren2, Cheng Shen1, Guowei Che3. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. 2. Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. 3. Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China guowei_che@yahoo.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Residual disease at the bronchial stump (RDBS) is regarded as an important factor possibly resulting in bronchopleural fistula (BPF) after lung cancer surgery, but this has not been confirmed. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of RDBS on BPF formation in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for full-text articles that met our eligibility criteria. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) served as the summarized outcomes. Q-test and I(2) statistic were used to evaluate the level of heterogeneity, determining the fixed-effect model or random-effect model for quantitative synthesis. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify the possible origins of heterogeneity. The publication bias was assessed by Begg's test. RESULTS: A total of eight retrospective observational studies were included in our meta-analysis. In overall analysis, the pooled outcomes indicated that RDBS was significantly associated with BPF formation after lung cancer surgery (OR: 3.12; 95% CI: 1.72-5.64; P < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, the pooled outcomes revealed a significantly increased risk of post-pneumonectomy BPF in patients with RDBS (OR: 2.78; 95% CI: 1.06-7.28; P = 0.037). The subgroup analysis assessing the effects of RDBS on post-lobectomy BPF was given up due to the scarcity of available data. No heterogeneity was revealed within this meta-analysis. No evidence for publication bias was detected by Begg's test. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis indicates that RDBS is positively associated with the increased risk of BPF in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. The further analysis also reveals an increased risk of post-pneumonectomy BPF in patients with RDBS. More accurate and comprehensive evidence should be collected and summarized in updated meta-analyses.
OBJECTIVES: Residual disease at the bronchial stump (RDBS) is regarded as an important factor possibly resulting in bronchopleural fistula (BPF) after lung cancer surgery, but this has not been confirmed. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of RDBS on BPF formation in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for full-text articles that met our eligibility criteria. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) served as the summarized outcomes. Q-test and I(2) statistic were used to evaluate the level of heterogeneity, determining the fixed-effect model or random-effect model for quantitative synthesis. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify the possible origins of heterogeneity. The publication bias was assessed by Begg's test. RESULTS: A total of eight retrospective observational studies were included in our meta-analysis. In overall analysis, the pooled outcomes indicated that RDBS was significantly associated with BPF formation after lung cancer surgery (OR: 3.12; 95% CI: 1.72-5.64; P < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, the pooled outcomes revealed a significantly increased risk of post-pneumonectomy BPF in patients with RDBS (OR: 2.78; 95% CI: 1.06-7.28; P = 0.037). The subgroup analysis assessing the effects of RDBS on post-lobectomy BPF was given up due to the scarcity of available data. No heterogeneity was revealed within this meta-analysis. No evidence for publication bias was detected by Begg's test. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis indicates that RDBS is positively associated with the increased risk of BPF in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. The further analysis also reveals an increased risk of post-pneumonectomy BPF in patients with RDBS. More accurate and comprehensive evidence should be collected and summarized in updated meta-analyses.
Authors: Salman Zaheer; Mark S Allen; Stephen D Cassivi; Francis C Nichols; Craig H Johnson; Claude Deschamps; Peter C Pairolero Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Kiran Shekar; Carole Foot; John Fraser; Marc Ziegenfuss; Peter Hopkins; Morgan Windsor Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2009-07-09 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Marco Mammana; Giuseppe Marulli; Andrea Zuin; Egle Perissinotto; Giovanni Maria Comacchio; Elisa De Franceschi; Federico Rea Journal: Surg Today Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 2.549