Literature DB >> 26614342

A Transferable H-Bonding Correction for Semiempirical Quantum-Chemical Methods.

Martin Korth, Michal Pitoňák, Jan Řezáč1, Pavel Hobza.   

Abstract

Semiempirical methods could offer a feasible compromise between ab initio and empirical approaches for the calculation of large molecules with biological relevance. A key problem for attempts in this direction is the rather bad performance of current semiempirical methods for noncovalent interactions, especially hydrogen-bonding. On the basis of the recently introduced PM6-DH method, which includes empirical corrections for dispersion (D) and hydrogen-bond (H) interactions, we have developed an improved and transferable H-bonding correction for semiempirical quantum chemical methods. The performance of the improved correction is evaluated for PM6, AM1, OM3, and SCC-DFTB (enhanced by standard empirical dispersion corrections) with several test sets for noncovalent interactions and is shown to reach the quality of current DFT-D approaches for these types of problems.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 26614342     DOI: 10.1021/ct900541n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  51 in total

1.  Structural basis for inhibition of cathepsin B drug target from the human blood fluke, Schistosoma mansoni.

Authors:  Adéla Jílková; Pavlína Rezácová; Martin Lepsík; Martin Horn; Jana Váchová; Jindrich Fanfrlík; Jirí Brynda; James H McKerrow; Conor R Caffrey; Michael Mares
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  A computational study on the role of noncovalent interactions in the stability of polymer/graphene nanocomposites.

Authors:  S Güryel; M Alonso; B Hajgató; Y Dauphin; G Van Lier; P Geerlings; F De Proft
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 3.  Molecular modeling of nucleic acid structure: energy and sampling.

Authors:  T E Cheatham; B R Brooks; P A Kollman
Journal:  Curr Protoc Nucleic Acid Chem       Date:  2001-05

4.  Transferable scoring function based on semiempirical quantum mechanical PM6-DH2 method: CDK2 with 15 structurally diverse inhibitors.

Authors:  Petr Dobeš; Jindřich Fanfrlík; Jan Rezáč; Michal Otyepka; Pavel Hobza
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Nucleic acid reactivity: challenges for next-generation semiempirical quantum models.

Authors:  Ming Huang; Timothy J Giese; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Performance comparison of computational methods for modeling alpha-helical structures.

Authors:  Alexandru Lupan; Attila-Zsolt Kun; Francisco Carrascoza; Radu Silaghi-Dumitrescu
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Prediction of trypsin/molecular fragment binding affinities by free energy decomposition and empirical scores.

Authors:  Mark L Benson; John C Faver; Melek N Ucisik; Danial S Dashti; Zheng Zheng; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Calculation of Host-Guest Binding Affinities Using a Quantum-Mechanical Energy Model.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Substrate binding activates the designed triple mutant of the colicin E7 metallonuclease.

Authors:  Eszter Németh; Tamás Körtvélyesi; Milan Kožíšek; Peter W Thulstrup; Hans E M Christensen; Masamitsu N Asaka; Kyosuke Nagata; Béla Gyurcsik
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.358

10.  Accurate macromolecular crystallographic refinement: incorporation of the linear scaling, semiempirical quantum-mechanics program DivCon into the PHENIX refinement package.

Authors:  Oleg Y Borbulevych; Joshua A Plumley; Roger I Martin; Kenneth M Merz; Lance M Westerhoff
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2014-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.