Literature DB >> 26611842

'Toy' laser macular burns in children: 12-month update.

N Raoof1, J O'Hagan2, N Pawlowska3, F Quhill3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is increasing evidence that high-powered hand-held laser devices cause retinal injury. We present 12-month follow-up data for three patients that we previously reported with such retinal injuries.
METHODS: A retrospective case series of three children with maculopathy secondary to exposure to high-power hand-held laser devices. All children underwent clinical examination and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) at presentation and follow-up. Fundus-controlled microperimetry was also undertaken 12-19 months after exposure.
RESULTS: Three children sustained macular injury after exposure to a high-powered hand-held laser. Acutely, they presented with a 'vitelliform-like' maculopathy with reduced vision. Over the course of follow-up, the best corrected Snellen acuity in all three patients improved to 'normal' levels (range 6/6-6/9). Long-term deficits in foveal retinal sensitivity were identified in two patients using fundus-controlled microperimetry. SD-OCT imaging showed persistent disruption of the foveal outer photoreceptor layers in all three children.
CONCLUSION: Although visual acuity improved over time, deficits in microperimetry and SD-OCT persisted. All three children had retinal pigment epithelium changes, requiring follow-up for longer-term sequelae of laser injuries such as expansion of retinal atrophy and development of choroidal neovascular membranes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26611842      PMCID: PMC4791691          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2015.222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  11 in total

1.  High-powered laser pointer injury resulting in macular hole formation.

Authors:  Dilsher S Dhoot; David Xu; Sunil Srivastava
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Thermal macular injury from a 154 mW green laser pointer.

Authors:  Maria E Lim; Joseph Suelzer; Ramana S Moorthy; Gautam Vemuri
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  Bilateral macular hole from a handheld laser pointer.

Authors:  Petros Petrou; Showrob Patwary; Philip J Banerjee; Graham R Kirkby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Normal values for the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test.

Authors:  M Mäntyjärvi; T Laitinen
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Retinal injury after inadvertent handheld laser exposure.

Authors:  Gregory D Lee; Caroline R Baumal; David Lally; John D Pitcher; James Vander; Jay S Duker
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence findings in a case of laser pointer-induced maculopathy.

Authors:  Irene Rusu; Jerome Sherman; Roberto Gallego-Pinazo; Michael Lam; K Bailey Freund
Journal:  Retin Cases Brief Rep       Date:  2013

7.  'Toy' laser macular burns in children.

Authors:  N Raoof; T K J Chan; N K Rogers; W Abdullah; I Haq; S P Kelly; F M Quhill
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 8.  [Laser pointers are not toys; eye injury with permanent loss of visual acuity].

Authors:  Jan E E Keunen; Ann-Laure M H Delbecq; J R M Hans Cruysberg; Jan C van Meurs; Ivan M Gan; Tos T J M Berendschot
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  2014

9.  High-power handheld blue laser-induced maculopathy: the results of the King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital Collaborative Retina Study Group.

Authors:  Sulaiman M Alsulaiman; Abdulaziz Adel Alrushood; Jluwi Almasaud; Sultan Alzaaidi; Yahya Alzahrani; J Fernando Arevalo; Nicola G Ghazi; Emad B Abboud; Sawsan R Nowilaty; Mohammad Al-Amry; Saba Al-Rashaed
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Bilateral macular injury from a green laser pointer.

Authors:  Ali Dirani; Elias Chelala; Ali Fadlallah; Rafic Antonios; George Cherfan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-30
View more
  5 in total

1.  Response to 'Comment on 'Toy' laser macular burns in children: 12-month update'.

Authors:  N Raoof; F Quhill
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Response to 'Toy' laser macular burns in children: 12-month update.

Authors:  E Mc Loone; M O'Neill
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  [Eyeball perforation of a 7-year-old girl caused by the "Must-Have Office Toy 2017" : The potential risk of injury by a spinning toy (fidget spinner)].

Authors:  A Nessmann; K Chaloupka; C Böni
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Non-Therapeutic Laser Retinal Injury.

Authors:  Patrick W Commiskey; Curtis J Heisel; Yannis M Paulus
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmic Res       Date:  2019-11-26

5.  En Face Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging Ellipsoid Zone Regeneration in Laser-Induced and Solar Maculopathies.

Authors:  Jeanne M Gunzinger; Katrin Fasler; Daniel Barthelmes; Peter Maloca; Pascal W Hasler; Christian Böni; Sandrine A Zweifel
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol Med       Date:  2019-11-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.