Hye Ryun Kim1, Gun Ha Kim1, So Hee Eun1, Baik Lin Eun1, Jung Hye Byeon2. 1. Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. 2. Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. byeonagnes@naver.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) is one of the most common types of pediatric epilepsy. It is generally treated with ethosuximide (ESM), valproic acid (VPA), or lamotrigine (LTG), but the efficacy and adverse effects of these drugs remain controversial. This study compared initial therapy treatment outcomes, including VPA-LTG combination, and assessed clinical factors that may predict treatment response and prognosis. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with typical CAE were retrospectively enrolled at the Korea University Medical Center. We reviewed patients' clinical characteristics, including age of seizure onset, seizure-free interval, duration of seizure-free period, freedom from treatment failure, breakthrough seizures frequency, and electroencephalogram (EEG) findings. RESULTS: The age at seizure onset was 7.9±2.7 years (mean±SD), and follow-up duration was 4.4±3.7 years. Initially, 22 children were treated with ESM (32.8%), 23 with VPA (34.3%), 14 with LTG (20.9%), and 8 with VPA-LTG combination (11.9%). After 48 months of therapy, the rate of freedom from treatment failure was significantly higher for the VPA-LTG combination therapy than in the three monotherapy groups (p=0.012). The treatment dose administrated in the VPA-LTG combination group was less than that in the VPA and LTG monotherapy groups. The shorter interval to loss of 3-Hz spike-and-wave complexes and the presence of occipital intermittent rhythmic delta activity on EEG were significant factors predicting good treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that low-dose VPA-LTG combination therapy has a good efficacy and fewer side effects than other treatments, and it should thus be considered as a firstline therapy in absence epilepsy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) is one of the most common types of pediatric epilepsy. It is generally treated with ethosuximide (ESM), valproic acid (VPA), or lamotrigine (LTG), but the efficacy and adverse effects of these drugs remain controversial. This study compared initial therapy treatment outcomes, including VPA-LTG combination, and assessed clinical factors that may predict treatment response and prognosis. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with typical CAE were retrospectively enrolled at the Korea University Medical Center. We reviewed patients' clinical characteristics, including age of seizure onset, seizure-free interval, duration of seizure-free period, freedom from treatment failure, breakthrough seizures frequency, and electroencephalogram (EEG) findings. RESULTS: The age at seizure onset was 7.9±2.7 years (mean±SD), and follow-up duration was 4.4±3.7 years. Initially, 22 children were treated with ESM (32.8%), 23 with VPA (34.3%), 14 with LTG (20.9%), and 8 with VPA-LTG combination (11.9%). After 48 months of therapy, the rate of freedom from treatment failure was significantly higher for the VPA-LTG combination therapy than in the three monotherapy groups (p=0.012). The treatment dose administrated in the VPA-LTG combination group was less than that in the VPA and LTG monotherapy groups. The shorter interval to loss of 3-Hz spike-and-wave complexes and the presence of occipital intermittent rhythmic delta activity on EEG were significant factors predicting good treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that low-dose VPA-LTG combination therapy has a good efficacy and fewer side effects than other treatments, and it should thus be considered as a firstline therapy in absence epilepsy.
Authors: Tracy A Glauser; Avital Cnaan; Shlomo Shinnar; Deborah G Hirtz; Dennis Dlugos; David Masur; Peggy O Clark; Peter C Adamson Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Tracy A Glauser; Avital Cnaan; Shlomo Shinnar; Deborah G Hirtz; Dennis Dlugos; David Masur; Peggy O Clark; Edmund V Capparelli; Peter C Adamson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dennis Dlugos; Shlomo Shinnar; Avital Cnaan; Fengming Hu; Solomon Moshé; Eli Mizrahi; David Masur; Yoshi Sogawa; J B Le Pichon; Calley Levine; Deborah Hirtz; Peggy Clark; Peter C Adamson; Tracy Glauser Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sara Matricardi; Alberto Verrotti; Francesco Chiarelli; Caterina Cerminara; Paolo Curatolo Journal: Pediatr Neurol Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 3.372