Sara Matricardi1, Alberto Verrotti2, Francesco Chiarelli3, Caterina Cerminara4, Paolo Curatolo4. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti, Chieti, Italy. Electronic address: sara.matricardi@yahoo.it. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. 3. Department of Pediatrics, University "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti, Chieti, Italy. 4. Department of Neurosciences, Pediatric Neurology Unit Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Childhood absence epilepsy is an age-dependent, idiopathic, generalized epilepsy with a characteristic seizure appearance. The disorder is likely to be multifactorial, resulting from interactions between genetic and acquired factors, but the debate is still open. We review recent studies on different aspects of childhood absence epilepsy and also to describe new concepts. METHODS: Data for this review were identified using Medline and PubMed survey to locate studies dealing with childhood absence epilepsy. Searches included articles published between 1924 and 2013. RESULTS: The diagnosis comprises predominant and associated seizure types associated with other clinical and electroencephalographic characteristics. Many studies have challenged the prevailing concepts, particularly with respect to the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the electroencephalographic seizure discharges. Childhood absence epilepsy fits the definition of system epilepsy as a condition resulting from the persisting susceptibility of the thalamocortical system as a whole to generate seizures. This syndrome, if properly defined using strict diagnostic criteria, has a good prognosis. In some cases, it may affect multiple cognitive functions determining risk for academic and functional difficulties; the detection of children at risk allows tailored interventions. Childhood absence epilepsy is usually treated with ethosuximide, valproate, lamotrigine, or levetiracetam, but the most efficacious and tolerable initial empirical treatment has not been well defined. CONCLUSIONS: We review recent studies and new concepts on the electroclinical features and pathophysiological findings of childhood absence epilepsy in order to highlight areas of consensus as well as areas of uncertainty that indicate directions for future research.
BACKGROUND:Childhood absence epilepsy is an age-dependent, idiopathic, generalized epilepsy with a characteristic seizure appearance. The disorder is likely to be multifactorial, resulting from interactions between genetic and acquired factors, but the debate is still open. We review recent studies on different aspects of childhood absence epilepsy and also to describe new concepts. METHODS: Data for this review were identified using Medline and PubMed survey to locate studies dealing with childhood absence epilepsy. Searches included articles published between 1924 and 2013. RESULTS: The diagnosis comprises predominant and associated seizure types associated with other clinical and electroencephalographic characteristics. Many studies have challenged the prevailing concepts, particularly with respect to the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the electroencephalographic seizure discharges. Childhood absence epilepsy fits the definition of system epilepsy as a condition resulting from the persisting susceptibility of the thalamocortical system as a whole to generate seizures. This syndrome, if properly defined using strict diagnostic criteria, has a good prognosis. In some cases, it may affect multiple cognitive functions determining risk for academic and functional difficulties; the detection of children at risk allows tailored interventions. Childhood absence epilepsy is usually treated with ethosuximide, valproate, lamotrigine, or levetiracetam, but the most efficacious and tolerable initial empirical treatment has not been well defined. CONCLUSIONS: We review recent studies and new concepts on the electroclinical features and pathophysiological findings of childhood absence epilepsy in order to highlight areas of consensus as well as areas of uncertainty that indicate directions for future research.
Authors: Stephen P Currie; Liliana L Luz; Sam A Booker; David J A Wyllie; Peter C Kind; Michael I Daw Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Marco Carotenuto; Michele Roccella; Francesco Pisani; Sara Matricardi; Alberto Verrotti; Giovanni Farello; Francesca Felicia Operto; Ilaria Bitetti; Francesco Precenzano; Giovanni Messina; Maria Ruberto; Cristiana Ciunfrini; Mariagrazia Riccardi; Eugenio Merolla; Grazia Maria Giovanna Pastorino; Anna Nunzia Polito; Rosa Marotta Journal: Behav Neurol Date: 2019-12-03 Impact factor: 3.342
Authors: Vincenzo Crunelli; Magor L Lőrincz; Cian McCafferty; Régis C Lambert; Nathalie Leresche; Giuseppe Di Giovanni; François David Journal: Brain Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 13.501