Literature DB >> 26610854

Effect of continuous deep sedation on survival in patients with advanced cancer (J-Proval): a propensity score-weighted analysis of a prospective cohort study.

Isseki Maeda1, Tatsuya Morita2, Takuhiro Yamaguchi3, Satoshi Inoue4, Masayuki Ikenaga5, Yoshihisa Matsumoto6, Ryuichi Sekine7, Takashi Yamaguchi8, Takeshi Hirohashi9, Tsukasa Tajima10, Ryohei Tatara11, Hiroaki Watanabe12, Hiroyuki Otani13, Chizuko Takigawa14, Yoshinobu Matsuda15, Hiroka Nagaoka16, Masanori Mori17, Yo Tei4, Ayako Kikuchi18, Mika Baba19, Hiroya Kinoshita6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuous deep sedation (CDS) before death is a form of palliative sedation therapy that has become a focus of strong debate, especially with respect to whether it shortens survival. We aimed to examine whether CDS shortens patient survival using the propensity score-weighting method, and to explore the effect of artificial hydration during CDS on survival.
METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of a large multicentre prospective cohort study that recruited and followed up patients between Sept 3, 2012, and April 30, 2014, from 58 palliative care institutions across Japan, including hospital palliative care settings, inpatient palliative care units, and home-based palliative care services. Adult patients (aged ≥ 20 years) with advanced cancer who received care through the participating palliative care services were eligible for this secondary analysis. Patients with missing data for outcome variables or who lived for more than 180 days were excluded. We compared survival after enrolment between patients who did and did not receive CDS. We used a propensity score-weighting method to control for patient characteristics, disease status, and symptom burden at enrolment.
FINDINGS: Of 2426 enrolled patients with advanced cancer, we excluded 289 (12%) for living longer than 180 days and 310 (13%) with missing data, leaving an analysis population of 1827 patients. 269 (15%) of 1827 patients received CDS. Unweighted median survival was 27 days (95% CI 22-30) in the CDS group and 26 days (24-27) in the no CDS group (median difference -1 day [95% CI -5 to 4]; HR 0·92 [95% CI 0·81-1·05]; log-rank p=0·20). After propensity-score weighting, these values were 22 days (95% CI 21-24) and 26 days (24-27), respectively (median difference -1 day [95% CI -6 to 4]; HR 1·01 [95% CI 0·87-1·17]; log-rank p=0·91). Age (p(interaction)=0·67), sex (p(interaction)=0·26), performance status (p(interaction)=0·90), and volume of artificial hydration (p(interaction)=0·14) did not have an effect modification on the association between sedation and survival, although care setting did have a significant effect modification (p(interaction)=0·021).
INTERPRETATION: CDS does not seem to be associated with a measurable shortening of life in patients with advanced cancer cared for by specialised palliative care services, and could be considered a viable option for palliative care in this setting. FUNDING: Japanese National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26610854     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00401-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  20 in total

1.  [Austrian guideline for palliative sedation therapy (long version) : Results of a Delphi process of the Austrian Palliative Society (OPG)].

Authors:  Dietmar Weixler; Sophie Roider-Schur; Rudolf Likar; Claudia Bozzaro; Thomas Daniczek; Angelika Feichtner; Christoph Gabl; Bernhard Hammerl-Ferrari; Maria Kletecka-Pulker; Ulrich H J Körtner; Hilde Kössler; Johannes G Meran; Aurelia Miksovsky; Bettina Pusswald; Thomas Wienerroither; Herbert Watzke
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2016-12-06

2.  Changes in opinions on palliative sedation of palliative care specialists over 16 years and their effects on clinical practice.

Authors:  Sayaka Maeda; Tatsuya Morita; Masayuki Ikenaga; Hirofumi Abo; Yoshiyuki Kizawa; Satoru Tsuneto
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  An optimal design for the study of palliative sedation-making somewhat better pictures.

Authors:  Hong Yup Ahn; So Jung Park; Hee Kyung Ahn; In Cheol Hwang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Palliative sedation: beliefs and decision-making among Spanish palliative care physicians.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Benítez-Rosario; Belén Ascanio-León
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Continuous Deep Sedation Until Death-a Swiss Death Certificate Study.

Authors:  Sarah Ziegler; Margareta Schmid; Matthias Bopp; Georg Bosshard; Milo Alan Puhan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Palliative Sedation for the Terminally Ill Patient.

Authors:  Ferdinando Garetto; Ferdinando Cancelli; Romina Rossi; Marco Maltoni
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.749

7.  Effect of Lorazepam With Haloperidol vs Haloperidol Alone on Agitated Delirium in Patients With Advanced Cancer Receiving Palliative Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  David Hui; Susan Frisbee-Hume; Annie Wilson; Seyedeh S Dibaj; Thuc Nguyen; Maxine De La Cruz; Paul Walker; Donna S Zhukovsky; Marvin Delgado-Guay; Marieberta Vidal; Daniel Epner; Akhila Reddy; Kimerson Tanco; Janet Williams; Stacy Hall; Diane Liu; Kenneth Hess; Sapna Amin; William Breitbart; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Association between continuous deep sedation and survival time in terminally ill cancer patients.

Authors:  So-Jung Park; Hee Kyung Ahn; Hong Yup Ahn; Kyu-Tae Han; In Cheol Hwang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Perception, Beliefs, and Attitudes Regarding Sedation Practices among Palliative Care Nurses and Physicians: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Margaux Vieille; Lionel Dany; Pierre Le Coz; Sophie Avon; Charlotte Keraval; Sébastien Salas; Cécile Bernard
Journal:  Palliat Med Rep       Date:  2021-05-24

10.  Palliative sedation and medical assistance in dying: Distinctly different or simply semantics?

Authors:  Reanne Booker; Anne Bruce
Journal:  Nurs Inq       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.