Literature DB >> 31637516

Palliative sedation: beliefs and decision-making among Spanish palliative care physicians.

Miguel Angel Benítez-Rosario1, Belén Ascanio-León2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe physician attitudes to deep palliative sedation.
METHODS: A nationwide e-survey of Spanish palliative care specialists was performed using vignettes which described patients close to death with intractable symptoms. Sedation levels were defined according to the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess the explanatory factors involved in decision-making.
RESULTS: Responses of 292 palliative care specialists were analyzed (response rate 40%). Ninety-four percent, 87%, and 81% of the respondents supported the use of palliative sedation in cases of irreversible refractory symptoms as hyperactive delirium and dyspnea at rest secondary to lung cancer and GOLD stage IV COPD; 60% agreed with the use of palliative sedation in cases of existential suffering. Logistic regression analysis found as the explanatory factor in not performing palliative sedation the physicians' belief that sedation therapy constitutes undercover euthanasia (OR = 12, p < 0.01). Around 80% of physicians who decided on palliative sedation chose deep/complete sedation for every vignette; there were no common explanatory factors for decision-making for every vignette. The belief that sedation therapy equates to undercover euthanasia justifies not performing deep sedation in cases of irreversible refractory agitated delirium (OR = 7) and irreversible intractable dyspnea (OR = 6). Physician background in palliative care and sedation were associated with the selection of deep/complete sedation in cases of refractory delirium and cancer-associated dyspnea.
CONCLUSIONS: Spanish palliative physicians generally agree with the use of deep sedation as a proportionate treatment in dying patients with refractory symptoms. Decision-making is associated with physician beliefs regarding euthanasia and with the physician's background in palliative care and sedation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer patients; Deep sedation; Dying patients; Palliative sedation; Physicians’ opinions; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31637516     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05086-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  26 in total

1.  Palliative sedation: more data and fewer opinions.

Authors:  Augusto Caraceni
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Last-resort options for palliative sedation.

Authors:  Timothy E Quill; Bernard Lo; Dan W Brock; Alan Meisel
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework for the use of sedation in palliative care.

Authors:  Nathan I Cherny; Lukas Radbruch
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.762

4.  Prospective observational Italian study on palliative sedation in two hospice settings: differences in casemixes and clinical care.

Authors:  Marco Maltoni; Guido Miccinesi; Piero Morino; Emanuela Scarpi; Francesco Bulli; Francesca Martini; Filippo Canzani; Monia Dall'Agata; Eugenio Paci; Dino Amadori
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Palliative sedation therapy: a systematic literature review and critical appraisal of available guidance on indication and decision making.

Authors:  Eva Schildmann; Jan Schildmann
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Palliative sedation in clinical scenarios: results of a modified Delphi study.

Authors:  M A Benítez-Rosario; T Morita
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Palliative sedation: ethical aspects.

Authors:  Guido Miccinesi; Augusto Caraceni; Marco Maltoni
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Efficacy of two types of palliative sedation therapy defined using intervention protocols: proportional vs. deep sedation.

Authors:  Kengo Imai; Tatsuya Morita; Naosuke Yokomichi; Masanori Mori; Akemi Shirado Naito; Hiroaki Tsukuura; Toshihiro Yamauchi; Takashi Kawaguchi; Kaori Fukuta; Satoshi Inoue
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  A systematic literature review on the ethics of palliative sedation: an update (2016).

Authors:  Blair Henry
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.302

10.  Using continuous sedation until death for cancer patients: a qualitative interview study of physicians' and nurses' practice in three European countries.

Authors:  Jane Seymour; Judith Rietjens; Sophie Bruinsma; Luc Deliens; Sigrid Sterckx; Freddy Mortier; Jayne Brown; Nigel Mathers; Agnes van der Heide
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.762

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evolution of European Resuscitation and End-of-Life Practices from 2015 to 2019: A Survey-Based Comparative Evaluation.

Authors:  Spyros D Mentzelopoulos; Keith Couper; Violetta Raffay; Jana Djakow; Leo Bossaert
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Medicalisation, suffering and control at the end of life: The interplay of deep continuous palliative sedation and assisted dying.

Authors:  Gitte Hanssen Koksvik; Naomi Richards; Sheri Mila Gerson; Lars Johan Materstvedt; David Clark
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2020-12-11

Review 3.  The Decision-Making Process for Palliative Sedation for Patients with Advanced Cancer-Analysis from a Systematic Review of Prospective Studies.

Authors:  Alazne Belar; Maria Arantzamendi; Johan Menten; Sheila Payne; Jeroen Hasselaar; Carlos Centeno
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.