| Literature DB >> 26608305 |
Zhengguang Guo1, Xuejiao Liu2, Menglin Li3, Chen Shao4, Jianling Tao5, Wei Sun6, Mingxi Li7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of chronic kidney failure and end-stage kidney disease. More accurate and non-invasive test for the diagnosis and monitoring the progression of DN is urgently needed for the better care of such patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26608305 PMCID: PMC4660682 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-015-0712-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Fig. 1Work flow of differential urinary glycoproteome analysis
Clinical characteristic of normal control, normalbuminuria, microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria patients
| Characteristics | Normal control (n = 16) | Normalbuminuria (group I) (n = 7) | Microalbuminuria (group II) (n = 8) | Macroalbuminuia (group III) (n = 8) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (M/F) | 8/8 | 3/4 | 5/3 | 4/4 |
| Age (years) | 47.25 ± 1.79 | 52.43 ± 2.91 | 47.33 ± 2.33 | 50.82 ± 1.7 |
| BMI (mg/m2) | 21.37 ± 0.43 | 25.77 ± 1.67a | 25.28 ± 1.51c | 24.39 ± 0.84 |
| SCr (μmol/L) | 76.85 ± 1.64 | 73.71 ± 4.13 | 84.78 ± 4.37 | 111.91 ± 4.31e |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 5.16 ± 0.28 | 5.05 ± 0.59 | 4.78 ± 0.70 | 7.41 ± 0.41e |
| UAE (μg/min) | 9.19 ± 0.96 | 6.81 ± 1.47 | 114.77 ± 17.63d | 1489.2 ± 502.6e |
| eGFR (mL/min) | 91.52 ± 2.62 | 90.66 ± 5.48 | 86.77 ± 5.54 | 57.58 ± 3.69e |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.88 ± 0.08 | 1.16 ± 0.14 | 2.03 ± 0.41d | 1.58 ± 0.14f |
| SBP (mmHg) | 119.33 ± 2.52 | 117.14 ± 5.96 | 123.89 ± 4.7 | 133.73 ± 4.41f |
| DBP (mmHg) | 76.6 ± 1.64 | 74.29 ± 2.97 | 79.44 ± 4.12 | 80 ± 3.3 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 3.31 ± 0.25 | 2.97 ± 0.27 | 3.27 ± 0.29 | 3.2 ± 0.24 |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.64 ± 0.06 | 1.31 ± 0.12 | 1.12 ± 0.1d | 1.29 ± 0.08f |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 5.01 ± 0.09 | 9.24 ± 1.17b | 9.07 ± 0.58d | 8.85 ± 0.64e |
| HBA1C (%) | n.a. | 8.19 ± 0.62 | 8.76 ± 0.62 | 8.71 ± 0.44 |
SCr serum creatinine, BUN blood urea nitrogen, UAE urine albumin, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, TG triglyceride, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, LDL low-density lipoprotein, HDL high-density lipoprotein, FBG fasting blood glucose, HBA1C glycatedhaemoglobin
a P < 0.05 between for normalbuminuria versus normal control
b P < 0.001 for normalbuminuria versus normal control
c P < 0.05 for microalbuminuria versus normal control
d P < 0.001 for microalbuminuria versus normal control
e P < 0.001 for macroalbuminuria versus normal control
f P < 0.05 for macroalbuminuria versus normal control
Fig. 2Qualitative and quantitative analysis of urinary glycoproteome. a SDS-PAGE analysis of glycoproteins enriched by ConA from different groups. Total total proteins, ConA ConA enriched N-linked glycoprotein. The arrows indicate albumin protein. Distribution of ConA enriched protein by quality (b) and quantity estimated by iBAQ (c)
Number of up-regulated proteins and down-regulated proteins in different stage of DN analyzed by LC–MS/MS
| Stage | Normalbuminuria | Microalbuminuria | Macroalbuminuria |
|---|---|---|---|
| Up-regulation | 34 | 62 | 74 |
| Down-regulation | 38 | 45 | 49 |
Fig. 3Hierarchical clustering analysis of the differential proteins in normalbuminuria, microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria. a Hierarchical clustering analysis of the differential proteins. Protein fold change of cluster 2 (b) and cluster 8 (c) in normalbuminuria, microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria
Fig. 4GO analysis of differential proteins during the course of DN. Differential proteins in normalbuminuia, microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria were classified into molecular function (a), biological process (b), and cellular component (c) categories for human genes, comparing to the entire human normal urinary proteome by GO analysis. Categories with constitution of at least 2 % were displayed in the bar charts
Fig. 5Relative functions and pathways in DN. a The apoptosis inhibitors were down-regulated in microalbuminuria. Differential proteins in HDL and LDL (b) and (c) acute phase signaling pathway in microalbuminuria (the protein expression changes in normalbuminuria, microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria were shown in bar charts respectively)
Fig. 6IPA analysis of differential proteins in DN. Function analysis (a) and top enriched pathways (b) in normalbuminuria, microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria. Z-score >2: significantly activated; Z-score ≤2, significantly inhibited. −Log(P value) >1.5: significantly enriched. Function analysis (c) and top enriched pathways (d) in DN glyoproteomic study, previous study and the summarized of glycoproteomic study and previous study
Selected six differential urinary proteins quantitative results in iTRAQ and Western blot analyses
| Gene name | Accession number | iTRAQ quantification | Western blot |
|---|---|---|---|
| SERPINA1 isoform 1 of alpha-1-antitrypsin | P01009 | 1:0.94:5.37:9.84 | 1:0.97:1.88:1.73 |
| CP ceruloplasmin | P00450 | 1:1.36:3.60:1.89 | 1:1.60:8.46:7.42 |
| TTR Transthyretin | P02766 | 1:2.04:1.37:7.95 | 1:1.67:1.38:14.03 |
| APOA4 apolipoprotein A-IV | P06727 | 1:0.58:3.73:3.15 | 1:2.70:3.67:5.67 |
| EGF Pro-epidermal growth factor | P01133 | 1:0.89:0.65:0.38 | 1:1.20:1.01:0.16 |
| GCDFP15 prolactin-inducible protein | P12273 | 1:0.21:0.39:0.25 | 1:0.84:0.86:0.16 |
Fig. 7Western blot validation for six differential proteins. SERPINA1 (a), CP (b), TTR (c), APOA4 (d), EGF (e) and GCDFP15 (f). ROC curves for Western Blot validation of SERPINA1 (g) and CP (h) in microalbuminuric group versus normoalbuminuric group
Fig. 8The correlation between the value of candidate biomarkers and individual urinary albumin excretion rates (UAER), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and Serum Creatinine (Scr) values. a SERPINA1, b CP, c TTR, d APOA4, e GCDFP15, f EGF
Fig. 9Differential proteins found in this study and previous studies in DM (a) and DN (b)
Fig. 10Differential proteins in acute phase signaling pathway in DN summarized in this and previous studies