| Literature DB >> 26608196 |
Susana Flecha1, Fiz F Pérez2, Jesús García-Lafuente3, Simone Sammartino3, Aida F Ríos2, I Emma Huertas1.
Abstract
A significant fraction of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) released to the atmosphere is absorbed by the oceans, leading to a range of chemical changes and causing ocean acidification (OA). Assessing the impact of OA on marine ecosystems requires the accurate detection of the rate of seawater pH change. This work reports the results of nearly 3 years of continuous pH measurements in the Mediterranean Sea at the Strait of Gibraltar GIFT time series station. We document a remarkable decreasing annual trend of -0.0044 ± 0.00006 in the Mediterranean pH, which can be interpreted as an indicator of acidification in the basin based on high frequency records. Modeling pH data of the Mediterranean outflow allowed to discriminate between the pH values of its two main constituent water masses, the Levantine Intermediate Water (LIW) and the Western Mediterranean Deep Water (WMDW). Both water masses also exhibited a decline in pH with time, particularly the WMDW, which can be related to their different biogeochemical nature and processes occurring during transit time from formation sites to the Strait of Gibraltar.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26608196 PMCID: PMC4660394 DOI: 10.1038/srep16770
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Potential temperature (), (b) Salinity obtained with the CT and (c) SAMI-pH data from August 2012 to June 2015.
Figure 2Fractions of the water masses forming the MOW during the monitoring period, according to the OMP analysis (see text): (a) LIW, (b) WDMW and (c) AW.
Figure 3(a) pHT25 obtained with the SAMI device averaged to 84 h (red line) and modelled pHT25 (black line), (b) Residuals between observed values and modelled outputs.
Figure 4Linear fitting of pH with time (see SI text) of the MOW and its forming water masses during the monitoring period: (a) MOW, (b) LIW and (c) WMDW. Blue and red lines represent the 95% confidence and prediction bands, respectively. Equations are shown in the SI text. Note the different scales for “y” axes in figures (a–c).