| Literature DB >> 26607809 |
Yoshimitsu Ohgiya1, Hiroshi Nobusawa, Noritaka Seino, Osamu Miyagami, Naomi Yagi, Sasamori Hiroto, Jiro Munechika, Masanori Hirose, Nobuyuki Takeyama, Nobuyuki Ohike, Ryu Matsuoka, Akihiko Sekizawa, Takehiko Gokan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate morphological and signal intensity (SI) changes of placental insufficiency on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to assess morphological changes and decreased flow voids (FVs) on T2-weighted rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) images for diagnosing placental insufficiency.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26607809 PMCID: PMC5600058 DOI: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2015-0051
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Magn Reson Med Sci ISSN: 1347-3182 Impact factor: 2.471
Fig. 1.A 35-year-old female with a normal functional placenta with no fetal growth restriction. T2-weighted half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement magnetic resonance image shows a large surface area of attachment to the uterus, with tapered edges (arrow).
Fig. 2.A 28-year-old female with insufficient placenta with fetal growth restriction. T2-weighted half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement magnetic resonance image shows a decreased size and number of flow voids (arrow) between the uterus and the placenta.
Fig. 3.A 31-year-old female with a normal functional placenta with no fetal growth restriction. T2-weighted half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement magnetic resonance image shows several clear flow voids (arrows) between the uterus and the placenta.
Mean placental thicknesses, placental areas, placental volumes, and placenta to amniotic fluid signal intensity ratio (SIR), size of flow voids (FVs), and number of FVs in fetuses with and without placental insufficiency
| Fetuses with placental insufficiency | Fetuses without placental insufficiency | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Placental thickness (mm) | 49.0 (9.8) | 36.9 (6.8) | <0.001 |
| Placental area (mm2) | 1.62 × 104 (7.1 × 103) | 2.67 × 104 (9.6 × 103) | <0.001 |
| Placental volume (mm3) | 5.13 × 105 (1.8 × 105) | 6.56 × 105 (2.8 × 105) | 0.036 |
| Placental to amniotic fluid SIR | 0.549 (0.16) | 0.685 (0.19) | <0.01 |
| Size of FVs (mm) | 3.4 (0.5) | 4.3 (0.5) | <0.01 |
| Number of FVs | 5.8 (0.9) | 6.5 (0.9) | <0.01 |
Note: Data in parentheses are standard deviation. FVs, flow voids; SIR, signal intensity ratio.
Mean placental volume of fetuses with and without placental insufficiency in less than 30 gestational weeks and 30 or more than 30 gestational weeks
| Less than 30 gestational weeks | 30 or more than 30 gestational weeks | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Placental volume (mm3) of fetuses without placental insufficiency | 5.31 × 105 (2.2 × 105) | 7.56 × 105 (2.5 × 105) | |
| Placental volume (mm3) of fetuses with placental insufficiency | 4.63 × 105 (1.6 × 105) | 6.41 × 105 (2.0 × 105) |
Note: Data in parentheses are standard deviation.
Diagnostic performance and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) in detection of placental insufficiency with globular appearance, decreased flow voids (FVs), and globular appearance plus decreased FVs
| Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | PPV | NPV | AUC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reader 1 | ||||||
| Globular appearance | 80 (20/25) | 88 (22/25) | 84 (42/50) | 87 (20/23) | 82 (22/27) | 0.89 (0.79, 0.99) |
| Decreased FVs | 76 (19/25) | 96 (24/25) | 86 | 95 (19/20) | 80 (24/30) | 0.85 (0.74, 0.97) |
| Globular appearance plus decreased FVs | 96 (24/25) | 84 (21/25) | 90 | 86 (24/28) | 96 (21/22) | 0.94 (0.88, 1.00) |
| Reader 2 | ||||||
| Globular appearance | 76 (19/25) | 80 (20/25) | 78 (39/50) | 79 (19/24) | 77 (20/26) | 0.80 (0.67, 0.92) |
| Decreased FVs | 52 | 88 (22/25) | 70 | 81 (13/16) | 65 (22/34) | 0.77 (0.62, 0.89) |
| Globular appearance plus decreased FVs | 88 | 76 (19/25) | 82 | 79 (22/28) | 86 (19/22) | 0.87 (0.77, 0.97) |
Note: Data in parentheses are percentages with values used to calculate percentages in the diagnostic performances and 95% confidence intervals in the AUCs.
P < 0.01 for comparison of accuracy between decreased FVs and globular appearance plus decreased FVs;
P < 0.01 for comparison of sensitivity between decreased FVs and globular appearance plus decreased FVs;
P < 0.01 for comparison of accuracy between decreased FVs and globular appearance plus decreased FVs; FVs, flow voids; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.