Georg Wiltberger1, Felix Krenzien2,3, Christian Benzing4, Georgi Atanasov4, Fritz Klein4, Hans-Michael Hau1, Linda Feldbrügge1, Johann Pratschke4, Moritz Schmelzle4, Sven Jonas5. 1. Department of Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 2. Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery and Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. felix.krenzien@charite.de. 3. Transplant Surgery Research Laboratory and Division of Transplant Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. felix.krenzien@charite.de. 4. Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery and Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 5. Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, 310Klinik Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The TNM classification for distal cholangiocarcinoma was first introduced in the 7th edition, which was published in 2009; however, prognostic accuracy compared with the 5th and 6th editions has not yet been evaluated and requires validation. METHODS: A prospective histological database of patients with distal bile duct cancer was analyzed, and histological parameters and stage of the distal cholangiocarcinoma were assessed according to the 5th, 6th, and 7th editions of the TNM classification. RESULTS: Between 1994 and 2012, a total of 516 patients underwent pancreatic head resection, of whom 59 patients (11.4 %) experienced histologically confirmed distal cholangiocarcinoma. The median overall survival time was 22.2 months (13.1-31.4). Tumor recurrence occurred in 23 patients after a median disease-free survival time of 14.1 months. The 7th edition showed a monotonicity of all gradients, with a stepwise increase of mortality related to a stepwise increase of tumor stage (log-rank test; p < 0.05) demonstrating best discrimination of all tested editions [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.82; 95 % CI 0.70-0.95; p = 0.012]. The discrimination rate was low for the 5th (AUC 0.67; 95 % CI 0.42-0.91; p = 0.18) and 6th editions (AUC 0.70; 95 % CI 0.47-0.93; p = 0.11), while the log-rank test did not reach statistical significance. On multivariate analysis, lymph node involvement and positive resection margins were positive and independent predictors of inferior survival (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The 7th edition of the TNM classification was favorable in terms of predicting outcome, and generated a monotonicity of all grades. Strikingly, the 7th edition, but not the 5th and 6th editions, was of prognostic significance to predict outcome.
BACKGROUND: The TNM classification for distal cholangiocarcinoma was first introduced in the 7th edition, which was published in 2009; however, prognostic accuracy compared with the 5th and 6th editions has not yet been evaluated and requires validation. METHODS: A prospective histological database of patients with distal bile duct cancer was analyzed, and histological parameters and stage of the distal cholangiocarcinoma were assessed according to the 5th, 6th, and 7th editions of the TNM classification. RESULTS: Between 1994 and 2012, a total of 516 patients underwent pancreatic head resection, of whom 59 patients (11.4 %) experienced histologically confirmed distal cholangiocarcinoma. The median overall survival time was 22.2 months (13.1-31.4). Tumor recurrence occurred in 23 patients after a median disease-free survival time of 14.1 months. The 7th edition showed a monotonicity of all gradients, with a stepwise increase of mortality related to a stepwise increase of tumor stage (log-rank test; p < 0.05) demonstrating best discrimination of all tested editions [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.82; 95 % CI 0.70-0.95; p = 0.012]. The discrimination rate was low for the 5th (AUC 0.67; 95 % CI 0.42-0.91; p = 0.18) and 6th editions (AUC 0.70; 95 % CI 0.47-0.93; p = 0.11), while the log-rank test did not reach statistical significance. On multivariate analysis, lymph node involvement and positive resection margins were positive and independent predictors of inferior survival (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The 7th edition of the TNM classification was favorable in terms of predicting outcome, and generated a monotonicity of all grades. Strikingly, the 7th edition, but not the 5th and 6th editions, was of prognostic significance to predict outcome.
Authors: Ekaterina Petrova; Felix Rückert; Sebastian Zach; YinFeng Shen; Jürgen Weitz; Robert Grützmann; Uwe A Wittel; Frank Makowiec; Ulrich T Hopt; Peter Bronsert; Florian Kühn; Bettina M Rau; Roman E Izrailov; Igor E Khatkov; Hryhoriy Lapshyn; Louisa Bolm; Dirk Bausch; Tobias Keck; Ulrich F Wellner; Gabriel Seifert Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Lauren M Postlewait; Cecilia G Ethun; Nina Le; Timothy M Pawlik; Stefan Buettner; George Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Gerardo Vitiello; Kenneth Cardona; Shishir K Maithel Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Johannes Byrling; Roland Andersson; Agata Sasor; Gert Lindell; Daniel Ansari; Johan Nilsson; Bodil Andersson Journal: Ann Gastroenterol Date: 2017-06-20
Authors: Oliver Beetz; Michael Klein; Harald Schrem; Jill Gwiasda; Florian W R Vondran; Felix Oldhafer; Sebastian Cammann; Jürgen Klempnauer; Karl J Oldhafer; Moritz Kleine Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2018-08-13 Impact factor: 2.102