Literature DB >> 26607220

Endothelialization of over- and undersized flow-diverter stents at covered vessel side branches: An in vivo and in silico study.

Philipp Berg1, Christina Iosif2, Sebastien Ponsonnard3, Catherine Yardin4, Gábor Janiga5, Charbel Mounayer2.   

Abstract

Although flow-diverting devices are promising treatment options for intracranial aneurysms, jailed side branches might occlude leading to insufficient blood supply. Especially differences in the local stent strut compression may have a drastic influence on subsequent endothelialization. To investigate the outcome of different treatment scenarios, over- and undersized stent deployments were realized experimentally and computationally. Two Pipeline Embolization Devices were placed in the right common carotid artery of large white swine, crossing the right ascending pharyngeal artery. DSA and PC-MRI measurements were acquired pre- and post-stenting and after three months. To evaluate the stent strut endothelialization and the corresponding ostium patency, the swine were sacrificed and scanning electron microscopy measurements were carried out. A more detailed analysis of the near-stent hemodynamics was enabled by a realistic virtual stenting in combination with highly resolved Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations using case-specific boundary conditions. The oversizing resulted in an elongated stent deployment with more open stent pores, while for the undersized case a shorter deployment with more condensed pores was present. In consequence, the side branch of the first case remained patent after three months and the latter almost fully occluded. The virtual investigation confirmed the experimental findings by identifying differences between the individual velocities as well as stent shear stresses at the distal part of the ostia. The choice of flow-diverting device and the subsequent deployment strategy strongly influences the patency of jailed side branches. Therefore, careful treatment planning is required, to guarantee sufficient blood supply in the brain territories supplied those branches.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD); Endothelialization; Flow-diverting stent; Stent shear stress; Virtual stenting

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26607220     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.10.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  10 in total

Review 1.  Computational Fluid Dynamics of Vascular Disease in Animal Models.

Authors:  Andrea Acuna; Alycia G Berman; Frederick W Damen; Brett A Meyers; Amelia R Adelsperger; Kelsey C Bayer; Melissa C Brindise; Brittani Bungart; Alexander M Kiel; Rachel A Morrison; Joseph C Muskat; Kelsey M Wasilczuk; Yi Wen; Jiacheng Zhang; Patrick Zito; Craig J Goergen
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  Flow diversion: what can clinicians learn from animal models?

Authors:  Robert Fahed; Tim E Darsaut; Jean-Christophe Gentric; Behzad Farzin; Igor Salazkin; Guylaine Gevry; Jean Raymond
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Outcome prediction of intracranial aneurysm treatment by flow diverters using machine learning.

Authors:  Nikhil Paliwal; Prakhar Jaiswal; Vincent M Tutino; Hussain Shallwani; Jason M Davies; Adnan H Siddiqui; Rahul Rai; Hui Meng
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 4.  Treatment of Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms with Flow-Diverter Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  F Cagnazzo; D Mantilla; P-H Lefevre; C Dargazanli; G Gascou; V Costalat
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Phase-contrast MRI versus numerical simulation to quantify hemodynamical changes in cerebral aneurysms after flow diverter treatment.

Authors:  Sergey Sindeev; Philipp Georg Arnold; Sergey Frolov; Sascha Prothmann; Dieter Liepsch; Andrea Balasso; Philipp Berg; Stephan Kaczmarz; Jan Stefan Kirschke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  In-stent Stenosis after p64 Flow Diverter Treatment.

Authors:  M Aguilar Pérez; P Bhogal; E Henkes; O Ganslandt; H Bäzner; H Henkes
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.649

7.  Safety Evaluation and Flow Modification in the Anterior Cerebral Artery after Pipeline Embolization Device Deployment across the Internal Carotid Artery Terminus.

Authors:  Chao Xu; Pei Wu; Jianyi Han; Bowen Sun; Chunlei Wang; Shancai Xu; Bin Luo; Xinjian Yang; Qingchun Mu; Huaizhang Shi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Effect of flow diverter stent malposition on intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics-An experimental framework using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry.

Authors:  Christoph Roloff; Philipp Berg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Mechanism of Action and Biology of Flow Diverters in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Krishnan Ravindran; Amanda M Casabella; Juan Cebral; Waleed Brinjikji; David F Kallmes; Ram Kadirvel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Efficacy and safety of the dual-layer flow-diverting stent (FRED) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Leopoldo Guimaraens; Elio Vivas; Jesus Saldaña; Juan Carlos Llibre; Alberto Gil; Ernest Balaguer; Ana Rodríguez-Campello; Elisa Cuadrado-Godia; Angel Ois
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 5.836

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.