| Literature DB >> 26606925 |
Hei Leung1, Chitra Raghavan2, Bo Zhou2, Ricardo Oliva2, Il Ryong Choi2, Vanica Lacorte2, Mona Liza Jubay2, Casiana Vera Cruz2, Glenn Gregorio2, Rakesh Kumar Singh2, Victor Jun Ulat3, Frances Nikki Borja3, Ramil Mauleon3, Nickolai N Alexandrov3, Kenneth L McNally3, Ruaraidh Sackville Hamilton3.
Abstract
Traditional rice varieties harbour a large store of genetic diversity with potential to accelerate rice improvement. For a long time, this diversity maintained in the International Rice Genebank has not been fully used because of a lack of genome information. The publication of the first reference genome of Nipponbare by the International Rice Genome Sequencing Project (IRGSP) marked the beginning of a systematic exploration and use of rice diversity for genetic research and breeding. Since then, the Nipponbare genome has served as the reference for the assembly of many additional genomes. The recently completed 3000 Rice Genomes Project together with the public database (SNP-Seek) provides a new genomic and data resource that enables the identification of useful accessions for breeding. Using disease resistance traits as case studies, we demonstrated the power of allele mining in the 3,000 genomes for extracting accessions from the GeneBank for targeted phenotyping. Although potentially useful landraces can now be identified, their use in breeding is often hindered by unfavourable linkages. Efficient breeding designs are much needed to transfer the useful diversity to breeding. Multi-parent Advanced Generation InterCross (MAGIC) is a breeding design to produce highly recombined populations. The MAGIC approach can be used to generate pre-breeding populations with increased genotypic diversity and reduced linkage drag. Allele mining combined with a multi-parent breeding design can help convert useful diversity into breeding-ready genetic resources.Entities:
Keywords: Disease resistance; Genetic diversity; MAGIC; SNP database
Year: 2015 PMID: 26606925 PMCID: PMC4659784 DOI: 10.1186/s12284-015-0069-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rice (N Y) ISSN: 1939-8425 Impact factor: 4.783
Fig. 1Growing needs for new diversity by breeders and global scientists
Studies investigating multiple rice genomes using different sequencing and genotyping platforms
| Sequencing and genotyping platform | Number of lines | Nature of germplasm | Number of high-quality SNPs discovered | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map-based sequencing | 1 | Single japonica variety | NA | International Rice Genome Sequencing Project ( |
| Perlegen chip array | 20 | OryzaSNP set: diverse collection mostly from japonica and indica, some from aus, deepwater, and aromatic group, actively used in international breeding programs | ~160 k | McNally et al. |
| Affymetrix single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array | 413 | Diverse rice varieties from 82 countries | 44,100 | Zhao et al. |
| Illumina GAx resequencing | 1,083 cultivated + 446 wild rice | Cultivated indica and japonica, wild rice | ~8 million | Huang et al. |
| Illumina GA2 resequencing | 50 | Mostly indica and japonica, | ~6.5 millon | Xu et al. |
| Illumina GoldenGate BeadArray 768-plex and 384-plex | 180 | Japan improved and landrace accessions (temperate japonica) | 2,688 | Yonemaru et al. |
| Illumina HiSeq2000 | 529 | Parental lines from IRRI breeding program; USDA rice genebank minicore subset | ~6.5 million | Agrama et al. |
| Illumina GA2 resequencing | 3,000 | Primarily landraces and released varieties | ~30 million | The 3,000 Rice Genomes Project |
| Illumina HiSeq2000 | 54 | 21 elite cultivars from CIAT rice breeding program; 33 elite cultivars from U.S. rice breeding program | ~18 million | Duitama et al. |
Fig. 2Allele mining work flow. Explore the sequenced genomes using known sequences or haplotypes. Identify accessions and evaluate phenotypes. Test the presence of new alleles in breeding lines and initiate crossing as needed. Mapping of traits and testing in diverse genetic background. Phenotype validation and new crosses to identify additional alleles
Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) found among 2494 rice lines at EBE sites targeted by known TAL effectors
| Gene name | Locus name | Chr | SNP ID | Reference/alternate allele | Frequency of alternate allele in diversity panel (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| LOC_Os08g42350 | 8 | 26728868 | A/G | 0.2 |
|
| LOC_Os11g31190 | 11 | 18174486 | G/A | 11.2 |
| LOC_Os11g31190 | 11 | 18174499 | G/C | 0.08 | |
| LOC_Os11g31190 | 11 | 18174555 | C/A | 0.2 | |
|
| LOC_Os12g29220 | 12 | 17305906 | T/G | 7.5 |
| LOC_Os12g29220 | 12 | 17305913 | G/C | 7.1 |
Numbers of Oryza sativa accessions with SNPs and deletions associated with virus resistance among the 3,000 sequenced accessions
| Gene name | Locus namea | SNP/deletion associated with phenotypeb | Expected phenotypec | Number of corresponding accessions among 3,000 accessions (%) | Reference | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOC_Os07g36940 | 3167 | |||||||||
|
| T | A | T | G | T | T | S to RTSV | 2,821 (94) | Lee et al. ( | |
| T |
| T | G | T | T | R to RTSV | 78 (2.6) | |||
| T | A | T | G |
| T | R to RTSV | 21 (0.7) | |||
| T | A | T |
|
|
| R to RTSV | 52 (1.7) | |||
| Othersd | Uncertain | 28 (0.9) | ||||||||
| 727 | ||||||||||
|
| LOC_Os11g30910 | G | C | G | G | C | G | S to RSV | 2,798 (93.3) | Wang et al. ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| R to RSV | 10 (0.3) | |||
| Othersd | Uncertain | 192 (6.4) | ||||||||
| 925 | ||||||||||
|
| LOC_Os04g42140 | G | A | A | A | T | A | S to RYMV | 3,000 (100) | Albar et al. ( |
|
| A | A | A | T | A | R to RYMV | 0(0) | |||
aFrom Michigan State University’s Rice Genome Annotation Project Release 7 (Os-Nipponbare-Reference-IRGSP-1.0 (Kawahara et al. 2013)
bNumbers above the first nucleotides indicate the positions in the coding sequences of the corresponding genes. Nucleotides (underlined bold) and deletions (−) are those reported to be associated with resistance to the corresponding viruses
cS: susceptible, R: resistant, RTSV: Rice tungro spherical virus, RSV: Rice stripe virus, RYMV: Rice yellow mottle virus
dSequences with other SNPs or deletions, and uncertain sequences
Fig. 3Mating design to convert genetic diversity to genetic resources with concentration of high-value traits. The design involves a) identifying new accessions with useful traits validated by phenotyping, b) using new accessions together with an elite line to produce a MAGIC population, c) breaking unfavorable linkages (adopted from Bandillo et al. 2013.), and d) producing breeding-ready resources