Literature DB >> 26606449

A histological analysis of human median and ulnar nerves following implantation of Utah slanted electrode arrays.

Michael B Christensen1, Heather A C Wark2, Douglas T Hutchinson3.   

Abstract

For decades, epineurial electrodes have been used in clinical therapies involving the stimulation of peripheral nerves. However, next generation peripheral nerve interfaces for applications such as neuroprosthetics would benefit from an increased ability to selectively stimulate and record from nerve tissue. This increased selectivity may require the use of more invasive devices, such as the Utah Slanted Electrode Array (USEA). Previous research with USEAs has described the histological response to the implantation of these devices in cats and rats; however, no such data has been presented in humans. Therefore, we describe here the degree of penetration and foreign body reaction to USEAs after a four-week implantation period in human median and ulnar nerves. We found that current array designs penetrate a relatively small percentage of the available endoneurial tissue in these large nerves. When electrode tips were located within the endoneurial tissue, labels for axons and myelin were found in close proximity to electrodes. Consistent with other reports, we found activated macrophages attached to explanted devices, as well as within the tissue surrounding the implantation site. Despite this inflammatory response, devices were able to successfully record single- or multi-unit action potentials and elicit sensory percepts. However, modifying device design to allow for greater nerve penetration, as well as mitigating the inflammatory response to such devices, would likely increase device performance and should be investigated in future research.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foreign body response; Human; Microelectrode; Neural prosthesis; Peripheral nerve

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26606449     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  10 in total

1.  Rodent model for assessing the long term safety and performance of peripheral nerve recording electrodes.

Authors:  Srikanth Vasudevan; Kunal Patel; Cristin Welle
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Host tissue response to floating microelectrode arrays chronically implanted in the feline spinal nerve.

Authors:  Christi L Kolarcik; Carlos A Castro; Andrew Lesniak; Anthony J Demetris; Lee E Fisher; Robert A Gaunt; Douglas J Weber; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Ultraflexible and Stretchable Intrafascicular Peripheral Nerve Recording Device with Axon-Dimension, Cuff-Less Microneedle Electrode Array.

Authors:  Dongxiao Yan; Ahmad A Jiman; Elizabeth C Bottorff; Paras R Patel; Dilara Meli; Elissa J Welle; David C Ratze; Leif A Havton; Cynthia A Chestek; Stephen W P Kemp; Tim M Bruns; Euisik Yoon; John P Seymour
Journal:  Small       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 15.153

Review 4.  The future of upper extremity rehabilitation robotics: research and practice.

Authors:  Philip P Vu; Cynthia A Chestek; Samuel R Nason; Theodore A Kung; Stephen W P Kemp; Paul S Cederna
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Restoration of motor control and proprioceptive and cutaneous sensation in humans with prior upper-limb amputation via multiple Utah Slanted Electrode Arrays (USEAs) implanted in residual peripheral arm nerves.

Authors:  Suzanne Wendelken; David M Page; Tyler Davis; Heather A C Wark; David T Kluger; Christopher Duncan; David J Warren; Douglas T Hutchinson; Gregory A Clark
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  On the use of Parylene C polymer as substrate for peripheral nerve electrodes.

Authors:  Natàlia de la Oliva; Matthias Mueller; Thomas Stieglitz; Xavier Navarro; Jaume Del Valle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Classification of naturally evoked compound action potentials in peripheral nerve spatiotemporal recordings.

Authors:  Ryan G L Koh; Adrian I Nachman; José Zariffa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Discriminability of multiple cutaneous and proprioceptive hand percepts evoked by intraneural stimulation with Utah slanted electrode arrays in human amputees.

Authors:  David M Page; Jacob A George; Suzanne M Wendelken; Tyler S Davis; David T Kluger; Douglas T Hutchinson; Gregory A Clark
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics.

Authors:  Alejandro Carnicer-Lombarte; Shao-Tuan Chen; George G Malliaras; Damiano G Barone
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 10.  Soft Devices for High-Resolution Neuro-Stimulation: The Interplay Between Low-Rigidity and Resolution.

Authors:  Ieva Vėbraitė; Yael Hanein
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2021-06-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.