Literature DB >> 26605262

Role of Craniofacial Resection for Malignant Tumors Involving the Anterior Skull Base: Surgical Experience in a Single Institution.

You-Sub Kim1, Kyung-Sub Moon1, Gun-Woo Kim1, Sang Chul Lim2, Kyung-Hwa Lee3, Woo-Youl Jang1, Tae-Young Jung1, In-Young Kim1, Shin Jung1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Craniofacial resection (CFR) has been regarded as a standard treatment for various tumors involving the anterior skull base. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of CFR for the patients with anterior skull base malignancies in our hospital.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 17 patients with anterior skull base malignancies treated with CFR between 2001 and 2012. Mean follow-up duration was 41 months (range, 2-103 months).
RESULTS: Intracranial involvement was found in 11 patients (65%) and orbital extension in 6 patients (35%). Classical bifrontal craniotomy was combined with endoscopic endonasal approach in 14 patients and external approach in 3 patients. Vascularized flap was used for reconstruction of the anterior fossa floor in 16 patients (94%). The most common pathological type was squamous cell carcinoma (6 patients). Gross total resection was achieved in all cases. Postoperative complications developed in 4 patients (24%) and included local wound problem and brain abscess. One patient with liver cirrhosis died from unexpected varix bleeding after the operation. Although postoperative treatment, such as radiotherapy or chemotherapy, was performed in 14 patients, local recurrence was seen in 6 patients. The mean overall survival time after the operation was 69.0 months (95% confidence interval: 47.5-90.5 months) with a 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rate of 82.3%, 76.5%, and 64.7%, respectively. Postoperative radiotherapy was found to be the powerful prognostic factor for favorable survival.
CONCLUSION: Considering the higher local control rate and acceptable complication or mortality rate, CFR with adjuvant radiotherapy is a gold standard treatment option for malignant tumors involving anterior skull base, especially with extensive intracranial involvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cranial fossa, anterior; Craniofacial resection; Paranasal sinus cancer; Peroperative complication; Treatment outcome

Year:  2015        PMID: 26605262      PMCID: PMC4656900          DOI: 10.14791/btrt.2015.3.2.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Tumor Res Treat        ISSN: 2288-2405


INTRODUCTION

Craniofacial resection (CFR) for anterior skull-base tumors has been used for about 30 years as a general surgical procedure since its original description [1]. Classical CFR consists of transfacial/transnasal and transcranial approaches. Recently, the endonasal approach using the endoscope, substitutive for the open transfacial approach, has been used as a universal surgical route. Furthermore, due to the development of the endoscope technique and instruments, a pure endoscopic approach, without a transcranial approach, has been attempted for tumor removal in the anterior skull base [2]. Although the pure endoscopic approach has been comprehensively compared with the classical traditional combined approach, there are many differences between the two groups of patients, and many constraints on the accurate comparison of the surgical results [3]. One study used purely endoscopic approach for the lesions without definitive invasion into skull base [4]. The study was limited by patient selection in being able to compare the surgical results of the classic CFR with the endoscopic techniques. Also, surgical outcomes by transcranial approach have recently improved as the result of advancement in microsurgical instruments and techniques. In the light of these advancements, there is a need to re-evaluate the indications of CFR with endoscopic approach. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the surgical results for CFR in our hospital with the review of the recently published data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study fulfilled all the requirements for patient anonymity and was approved by the Institutional Review Board (MP 2015-010). From 2001 to 2012, 17 patients underwent CFR for anterior skull-base malignancies in our hospital. The benign pathologic case was excluded. The medical records were evaluated for patient demographics, clinical features, staging, preoperative treatment, operative procedure, extent of tumor extension, postoperative complication, follow-up, recurrence rate, and survival rate. Mean follow-up duration was 41 months (range, 2-103 months). Based on the preoperative computed tomography scan and/or magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative findings, the exact location of tumor and its extension into orbit or intracranial structures were evaluated. The tumors were classified according to both the Kadish and Biller staging systems. The Kadish staging system describes three stages to determine the location and extension of olfactory neuroblastoma [4]: Stage A: tumor confined to the nasal cavity; Stage B: tumor confined to the nasal cavity and one or more paranasal sinus; and Stage C: tumor extending beyond the nasal cavity or paranasal sinuses, and includes involvement of the orbit, base of skull, or intracranial extension. The Biller staging system has four stages to determine the location and extension of remaining other tumors [5]. T1 stage is defined as a tumor involving the nasal cavity and adjacent paranasal sinuses (excluding sphenoid), with or without erosion of the bone of the anterior cranial fossa. T2 stage is defined as a tumor extending into the periorbital tissue or protruding into the anterior cranial fossa. T3 stage is defined as a tumor involving the brain that is resectable with margins. T4 stage is defined as a non-resectable tumor. All specimens were examined in our pathology department. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of surgery until death, or until the date of the last follow-up visit for patients who were still alive. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was also calculated as the time from the date of surgery to the date of recurrence or death. Survival rate was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. For the multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors were determined using the Cox's proportional hazards model. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0 software program for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The level of significance was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

Patient demographics and clinical symptoms at the time of initial diagnosis are listed in Table 1. The most common symptoms were epistaxis and nasal obstruction. Two patients with paranasal malignancies underwent radiochemotherapy before CFR. The median age was 56 years (range, 34-74 years) and male to female ratio was 12 to 5. The most common pathological type was squamous cell carcinoma (6 patients). Tumors invaded only in the cribriform plate in 5 patients, extended through dura in 4 patients, and involved brain parenchyma in 7 patients. Orbit involvement was noted in 6 patients. All olfactory neuroblastomas were classified as stage C of the Kadish system. Majority of the remaining tumors were classified as T3 or T4 of the Biller classification system.
Table 1

Summary of clinical & radio-pathological characteristics in patients who underwent craniofacial resection

CharacteristicsNo. of patients (%)
Demographics and history
 Sex
  Male12
  Female5
 Mean age (yr)56 (34-74)
 Symptom/signs
  Epistaxis6
  Nasal obstruction/mass5
  Proptosis, eye pain3
  Severe headache, drowsiness3
  Anosmia1
 Preoperative treatment
  Transnasal biopsy/resection5
  Chemotherapy2
  Radiotherapy0
Characteristics of tumor
 Pathology
  Carcinoma
   Squamous cell6
   Adenocarcinoma1
   Adenoidcystic1
   Small cell neuroendocrine2
  Metastatic melanoma1
  Teratocarcinosarcoma1
  Neuroblastoma5
 Extension of tumor*
  Cribriform plate5 (29)
  Intracranial involvement11 (65)
   Dura4
   Parenchyme7
  Orbit involvement6 (35)
 Tumor stage
  T stage (n=12)
   T10
   T21
   T35
   T46
  Kadish stage (n=5)
   B0
   C5

*confirmed by radiological and intra-operative findings, †T stage for eleven cases except olfactory neuroblastomas, Kadish stage for only olfactory neuroblastoma cases

Classical bifrontal craniotomy was combined with endoscopic endonasal approach in 14 patients. External approach was used in 3 patients with severe orbital involvement for orbital exenterating (Table 2). Reconstruction of the anterior fossa floor was performed using vascularized flap in 16 patients (94%). Apart from 3 cases requiring free flap after orbital exenterating, the remaining 13 cases underwent nasoseptal flap. Gross total resection was achieved in all cases. Four patients (20%) experienced postoperative complications including local wound problem [3 patients; 2 with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage] and brain abscess (1 patient). One patient with liver cirrhosis died from unexpected varix bleeding. Although postoperative treatment such as radiotherapy or chemotherapy was performed in 14 patients, local recurrence was seen in 6 patients (35%).
Table 2

Summary of treatment and outcomes in patients who underwent craniofacial resection

VariablesNo. of patients (%)
Treatment associated
 Approach
  Combined endoscopic approach14
  Combined external approach (orbital exenteration)3
 Skull base reconstruction by vascularized flap16 (94)
  Nasoseptal flap13
  Free flap (all orbital exenteration)3
 Gross total resection17 (100)
 Adjuvant treatment14 (82)
  Radiation13
  Chemotherapy2
Outcomes
 Recurrence6 (35)
  Reoperation2
 Complication4 (24)
  Local flap problems3*
  Brain abscess1
 Mortality1 (5)

*all free flap case, 2 with CSF leak, †unpredicted varix bleeding from known liver cirrhosis 1 month after operation. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid

The mean OS time after CFR of anterior skull base tumors was 69.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 47.5-90.5 months, the median survival time was not reached]. One-, 2-, and 5-year survival rate was 82.3%, 76.5%, and 64.7%, respectively (Fig. 1). The results of analyses of the variables that could be correlated with OS are shown in Fig. 2 and Table 3. On univariate and multivariate analysis, postoperative radiotherapy was significantly related with survival time.
Fig. 1

Overall survival in 1,917 patients (except 1 mortality case) after CFR for malignant tumors involving anterior skull base tumors. Note that the mean survival time was 69.0 months (95% CI: 47.5-90.5 months, the median survival time was not reached) and 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 82.3%, 76.5%, and 64.7%, respectively. CFR, craniofacial resection; CI, confidence interval.

Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier analyses of overall survival for 17 patients according to different predictors (overall comparison was estimated using a log-rank test). A: Pathology. B: Brain involvement. C: Combined approach methods. D: Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy.

Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analysis for overall survival predictors

VariablesNoMean±SD (mo)UnivariateMultivariate
p-valueHR95% CIp-value
Age0.515ND0.166
 <60 yr1073.6±13.5
 ≥60 yr749.7±13.8
Sex0.898ND0.339
 M1268.3±13.5
 F553.0±15.5
Symptoms*0.584ND0.980
 Non-neurological1265.2±12.7
 Neurological555.6±12.0
Approach0.140ND0.599
 With endoscopic1475.3±11.4
 With external327.7±17.0
Pathology0.338ND0.057
 Neuroblastoma584.8±15.8
 Other cancer type1246.5±9.3
Brain involvement0.154ND0.974
 No1070.0±9.5
 Yes756.6±14.7
Postoperative RT<0.0010.004-0.3690.005
 No411.5±6.60.039
 Yes1388.5±9.31
Postoperative Cx0.510ND0.297
 No1373.5±12.1
 Yes442.5±14.1
Recurrence0.676ND0.148
 No1166.6±14.3
 Yes661.7±11.0

*non-neurological symptom; mainly related with nasal symptom including epistaxis, nasal obstruction or mass, neurological sign; mental changes, headache, nausea/vomit, cranial nerve signs, orbital pain, seizure. CI, confidence interval; Cx, complication; HR, harzard ratio; ND, non-detected; RT, radiotherapy; SD, standard deviation

In a view of RFS, the mean RFS time after the operation was 47.1 months (95% CI: 25.9-68.4 months, the median survival time was 30.0 months). One-, 2-, and 5-year RFS rate was 64.7%, 47.1%, and 30.7%, respectively (Fig. 3). On univariate and multivariate analysis, postoperative radiotherapy was also significantly related with RFS time (Fig. 4, Table 4). Considering the small number of this study, however, pathologic type showed somewhat relationship with OS (p=0.057) and RFS (p=0.053) after the operation.
Fig. 3

Relapse-free survival in 17 patients after CFR for malignant tumors involving anterior skull base. Note that the mean survival time was 47.1 months (95% CI: 25.9-68.4 months, the median survival time was 30.0 months) and 1-, 2-, and 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 64.7%, 47.1%, and 30.7%, respectively. CFR, craniofacial resection; CI, confidence interval.

Fig. 4

Kaplan-Meier analyses of relapse-free survival for 17 patients according to different predictors (overall comparison was estimated using a log-rank test). A: Pathology. B: Brain involvement. C: Combined approach methods. D: Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy.

Table 4

Univariate and multivariate analysis for relapse-free survival predictors

VariablesNoMean±SD (mo)UnivariateMultivariate
p-valueHR95% CIp-value
Age0.505ND0.218
 <60 yr1037
 ≥60 yr715
Sex0.453ND0.173
 M1237
 F515
Symptoms*0.160ND0.295
 Non-neurological12ND
 Neurological515
Approach0.637ND0.894
 With endoscopic1437
 With external312
Pathology0.193ND0.053
 Neuroblastoma550
 Other cancer type1215
Brain involvement0.298ND0.893
 No1050
 Yes715
Postoperative RT0.0051.417-23.9720.015
 No421
 Yes13505.827
Postoperative Cx0.740ND0.183
 No1337
 Yes430

*non-neurological symptom; mainly related with nasal symptom including epistaxis, nasal obstruction or mass, neurological sign; mental changes, headache, nausea/vomit, cranial nerve signs, orbital pain, seizure. CI, confidence interval; Cx, complication; HR, harzard ratio; ND, non-detected; RT, radiotherapy

DISCUSSION

Anterior CFR has remained the gold standard for the management of tumors involving the anterior skull base. The addition of postoperative radiation with or without chemotherapy has shown a favorable effect on treatment result of advanced malignancies of the paranasal sinus extending to the anterior skull base [6]. The continuous improvement in endoscopic surgical instrumentation led to the advance of endoscopic-assisted CFR for sinonasal malignancies [7]. In recent years, there has been increasing popularity of purely endoscopic resection of malignant tumors involving the anterior skull base [289]. Resection should be radical, regardless of approach modalities for the lesion, because patients with local relapse after previous treatment have a worse prognosis [2]. Because of the relative rarity of anterior CFR, there are few centers that treated adequate numbers of patients for meaningful analysis of outcomes [10]. In an effort to overcome these difficulties, an international collaborative study on craniofacial surgery for malignant skull base tumors collected data from 1,307 patients in 2003. With a median follow-up of 25 months, the 5-year overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival rate was 54%, 60%, and 53%, respectively [11]. Tumor-related variables, such as the histological variation, intracranial tumor extent, status of surgical margin, and postoperative complication, influence outcomes [1112]. Many studies of CFR have reported postoperative complications as high as 40%, and postoperative mortality rate has remained about 5% [111213]. According to the literatures, complications after CFR includes CSF leakage, frontal pneumocephalus, local wound infection, meningitis and disturbance of central nervous systems. The CSF leakage, wound infection, meningitis occurred more frequently than other complications. The CSF leakage was recovered with conservative treatment but wound infection and meningitis were fatal requiring invasive antibiotics or reoperation [91014]. These surgical limitations have prompted the search for more safe approaches to the anterior skull base [9]. Endonasal techniques are thought to offer several advantages. When compared to the traditional anterior CFR, the use of pure endonasal endoscopic resection is associated with a decreased blood loss, benefit of a desirable cosmetic outcome and faster recovery [9]. Comparing the results of traditional CFR with pure endoscopic resection continues to be difficult because most published reports on exclusive endoscopic approach resection include small case series of patients with a short follow-up [10]. In addition, Hanna et al. [2] treated with exclusive endoscopic approach only patients with earlier disease stage with limited or no skull base involvement. As the interest of endoscopic resection of tumors involving the anterior skull base increases, concurrent improvements in traditional techniques are occurring [3]. The traditional anterior CFR and the endoscopic resection might not be two opposing techniques, but two useful methods to achieve the goal of a safe and radical resection when they were properly applied [10]. In order to better understand the role of CFR, we assessed our surgical outcomes in the context of recently published series [31014]. Previously reported 5-year OS rate, gross total resection rate, complication rate are 46-72%, 98-100%, and 9.7-47%, respectively (Table 5). Histology, extent of intracranial involvement, increasing age, incomplete tumor removal, and staging were associated with poor survival outcome [101516]. The status of the surgical margins is an important predictor for overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival [14]. The histological finding of the primary tumor and extent of intracranial involvement is also a significant predictor of overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival [1217]. Increased age was reported as a risk factor for poor survival [14]. In our study, postoperative radiotherapy was significant predictor for longer OS and RFS. Neuroblastoma type seemed to be related with prolonged OS and RFS, compared to other pathologies.
Table 5

Summary of recent studies assessing craniofacial resection for malignant tumor involving anterior skull base

Author (yr, No. of case)Histology (m/c)IC (+)OB (+)GTR rateCx rate (m/c)/ mortality rateOSSurvival factors
Cantu et al. (2012, 366)AD (49%)25%30%98%30% (CSF leak)/3.6%46% (5 yr)/34% (10 yr)Histological type, surgical margin, INT classification, postsurgical radiotherapy
Mine et al. (2011, 30)SQ (38%)66%NA100% (87%)*47% (local infection)/3.2%80% (2 yr)/72% (5 yr)/63% (10 yr)Surgical margin
Raza et al. (2012, 41)OFN (29%)72%54%100% (85%)*9.7% (pneumocephalus)/0%NANA
Present series (2014, 17)SQ (35%)65%35%100%24% (wound problem)/6%882% (1 yr)/77% (2 yr)/65% (5 yr)Postsurgical radiotherapy

*% in microscopic examination, †histological type was possibly related with overall survival without statistical significance. AD, adenocarcinoma; Cx, complications; GTR, gross total resection; IC, intracranial involvement; INT, Istituto Nazionale Tumori; m/c, most common type; NA, not available; No., number; OB, orbit involvement; OFN, olfactory neuroblastoma; OS, overall survival rate; SQ, squamous carcinoma

In conclusion, this study was basically a retrospective investigation of a relatively small number of patients, possibly leading to selection bias. Although there are limitations in number of cases and follow-up duration, our study shows that CFR followed by adjuvant radiotherapy can remain the primary option for malignant tumors involving anterior skull base, especially with intracranial extension.
  17 in total

1.  Olfactory neuroblastoma. A clinical analysis of 17 cases.

Authors:  S Kadish; M Goodman; C C Wang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Postoperative complications of salvage total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Ian Ganly; Snehal Patel; Jeanette Matsuo; Bhuvanesh Singh; Dennis Kraus; Jay Boyle; Richard Wong; Nancy Lee; David G Pfister; Ashok Shaha; Jatin Shah
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Craniofacial Resection for Sinonasal Malignant Tumors: Statistical Analysis of Surgical Outcome over 17 Years at a Single Institution.

Authors:  Seiichiro Mine; Naokatsu Saeki; Kentaro Horiguchi; Toyoyuki Hanazawa; Yoshitaka Okamoto
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2011-07

4.  Complications of craniofacial resection for tumors involving the anterior skull base.

Authors:  D H Kraus; J P Shah; E Arbit; J H Galicich; E W Strong
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Endoscopic resection of sinonasal cancers with and without craniotomy: oncologic results.

Authors:  Ehab Hanna; Franco DeMonte; Samer Ibrahim; Dianna Roberts; Nicholas Levine; Michael Kupferman
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-12

6.  Craniofacial resection for paranasal sinus cancers.

Authors:  G P Bridger; B Kwok; M Baldwin; J R Williams; R I Smee
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  Craniofacial surgery for malignant skull base tumors: report of an international collaborative study.

Authors:  Snehal G Patel; Bhuvanesh Singh; Ashok Polluri; Patrick G Bridger; Giulio Cantu; Anthony D Cheesman; Geraldo M deSa; Paul Donald; Dan Fliss; Patrick Gullane; Ivo Janecka; Shin-Etsu Kamata; Luiz P Kowalski; Dennis H Kraus; Paul A Levine; Luiz R M dos Santos; Sultan Pradhan; Victor Schramm; Carl Snyderman; William I Wei; Jatin P Shah
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Comparison of transnasal endoscopic and open craniofacial resection for malignant tumors of the anterior skull base.

Authors:  Jean Anderson Eloy; Richard J Vivero; Kimberly Hoang; Frank J Civantos; Donald T Weed; Jacques J Morcos; Roy R Casiano
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Complications and early outcome of anterior craniofacial resection.

Authors:  W J Richtsmeier; R J Briggs; W M Koch; D W Eisele; M C Loury; J C Price; D E Mattox; B S Carson
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1992-09

10.  Surgical outcomes and safety of transnasal endoscopic resection for anterior skull tumors.

Authors:  Sandeep P Dave; Anthony Bared; Roy R Casiano
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.497

View more
  3 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Delayed Surgical Recovery and Massive Bleeding in Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Kenya Kobayashi; Fumihiko Matsumoto; Yasuji Miyakita; Masaki Arikawa; Go Omura; Satoko Matsumura; Atsuo Ikeda; Azusa Sakai; Kohtaro Eguchi; Yoshitaka Narita; Satoshi Akazawa; Shimpei Miyamoto; Seiichi Yoshimoto
Journal:  Biomed Hub       Date:  2020-07-07

2.  Complications in Salvage Surgery for Nasal and Paranasal Malignant Tumors Involving the Skull Base.

Authors:  Masanori Teshima; Hirotaka Shinomiya; Naoki Otsuki; Hidehito Kimura; Masaaki Taniguchi; Kazunobu Hashikawa; Eiji Kohmura; Ken-Ichi Nibu
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-09-14

3.  Short-term survival in extensive craniofacial resections.

Authors:  Ana Kober N Leite; Gustavo Fernandes de Alvarenga; Sérgio Gonçalves; Alexandre Bezerra Dos Santos; Hugo Sterman Neto; Claudio R Cernea; Marco Aurélio V Kulcsar; Luiz Paulo Kowalski; Leandro Luongo Matos
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.365

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.