Literature DB >> 12973841

Craniofacial surgery for malignant skull base tumors: report of an international collaborative study.

Snehal G Patel1, Bhuvanesh Singh, Ashok Polluri, Patrick G Bridger, Giulio Cantu, Anthony D Cheesman, Geraldo M deSa, Paul Donald, Dan Fliss, Patrick Gullane, Ivo Janecka, Shin-Etsu Kamata, Luiz P Kowalski, Dennis H Kraus, Paul A Levine, Luiz R M dos Santos, Sultan Pradhan, Victor Schramm, Carl Snyderman, William I Wei, Jatin P Shah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malignant tumors of the skull base are rare. Therefore, no single center treats enough patients to accumulate significant numbers for meaningful analysis of outcomes after craniofacial surgery (CFS). The current report was based on a large cohort that was analyzed retrospectively by an International Collaborative Study Group.
METHODS: One thousand three hundred seven patients who underwent CFS in 17 institutions were analyzable for outcome. The median age was 54 years (range, 1-98 years). Definitive treatment prior to CFS had been administered in 59% of patients and included radiotherapy in 367 patients (28%), chemotherapy in 151 patients (12%), and surgery in 523 patients (40%). The majority of tumors (87%) involved the anterior cranial fossa. Squamous cell carcinoma (29%) and adenocarcinoma (16%) were the most common histologic types. The margins of surgical resection were reported close/positive in 412 patients (32%). Adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy was received by 510 patients (39%), and chemotherapy was received by 57 patients (4%).
RESULTS: Postoperative complications were reported in 433 patients (33%), with local wound complications the most common (18%). The postoperative mortality rate was 4%. With a median follow-up of 25 months, the 5-year overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival rates were 54%, 60%, and 53%, respectively. The histology of the primary tumor, its intracranial extent, and the status of surgical margins were independent predictors of overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: CFS is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with malignant tumors of the skull base. The histology of the primary tumor, its intracranial extent, and the status of surgical margins are independent determinants of outcome. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.11630

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12973841     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  65 in total

1.  Results of anterior skull base surgery in pediatric and young adult patients.

Authors:  Neil D Gross; Ian Ganly; Snehal G Patel; Mark H Bilsky; Jatin P Shah; Dennis H Kraus
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2010-03

Review 2.  Skull-base metastases.

Authors:  Florence Laigle-Donadey; Sophie Taillibert; Nadine Martin-Duverneuil; Jerzy Hildebrand; Jean-Yves Delattre
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Combined craniofacial resection of anterior skull base tumors: long-term results and experience of single institution.

Authors:  Bashar Abuzayed; Bulent Canbaz; Galip Zihni Sanus; Seckin Aydin; Harun Cansiz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Microvascular reconstruction of the skull base: a clinical approach to surgical defect classification and flap selection.

Authors:  Andrea L Pusic; Constance M Chen; Snehal Patel; Peter G Cordeiro; Jatin P Shah
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2007-02

5.  Skull base surgery: the first 50 years.

Authors:  Jatin P Shah
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Impact of Dural Resection on Sinonasal Malignancies with Skull Base Encroachment or Erosion.

Authors:  Hedyeh Ziai; Eugene Yu; Terence Fu; Nidal Muhanna; Eric Monteiro; Allan Vescan; Gelareh Zadeh; Ian J Witterick; David P Goldstein; Fred Gentili; John R de Almeida
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-12-29

7.  "How much is enough?" endonasal surgery for olfactory neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Carl H Snyderman; Paul A Gardner
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2010-09

8.  Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Moran Amit; Yoav Binenbaum; Kanika Sharma; Naomi Ramer; Ramer Naomi; Ilana Ramer; Ramer Ilana; Abib Agbetoba; Agbetoba Abib; Brett Miles; Xinjie Yang; Delin Lei; Kristine Bjoerndal; Bjoerndal Kristine; Christian Godballe; Godballe Christian; Thomas Mücke; Mücke Thomas; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Wolff Klaus-Dietrich; Dan Fliss; André M Eckardt; Chiara Copelli; Copelli Chiara; Enrico Sesenna; Frank Palmer; Palmer Frank; Snehal Patel; Ziv Gil
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2013-05-15

9.  Outcomes and toxicities of definitive radiotherapy and reirradiation using 3-dimensional conformal or intensity-modulated (pencil beam) proton therapy for patients with nasal cavity and paranasal sinus malignancies.

Authors:  Ming Fan; Jung Julie Kang; Anna Lee; Dan Fan; Huili Wang; Sarin Kitpanit; Pamela Fox; Kevin Sine; Dennis Mah; Sean M McBride; Chiaojung Jillian Tsai; Nadeem Riaz; Lara A Dunn; Eric J Sherman; Loren Michel; Bhuvanesh Singh; Ian Ganly; Richard J Wong; Jay O Boyle; Marc A Cohen; Nancy Y Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Craniofacial resection for malignant tumours involving the anterior skull base.

Authors:  Giulio Cantù; Stefano Riccio; Gabriella Bimbi; Massimo Squadrelli; Sarah Colombo; Alvaro Compan; Marco Rossi; Madia Pompilio; Carlo L Solero
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.